Surrogate model application to the identification of an optimal surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation strategy for DNAPL-contaminated sites

Journal of Earth Science

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1023-1032

  Luo, Jiannan ^a,b   Lu, Wenxi ^a,b   Xin, Xin ^a,b   Chu, Haibo ^a,b  

^a Jilin University   (China)

^b JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

DNAPL; Latin hypercube sampling; radial basis function artificial neural network; simulation optimization; surrogate model

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER POLLUTION; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; FLOW MODELING; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84890378844     PISSN: 1674487X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12583-013-0395-1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abriola, L. M., 1989. Modeling Multiphase Migration of Organic Chemicals in Groundwater Systems-A Review and Assessment. Environ. Health Perspect., 83: 117-143, doi: 10. 1289/ehp. 8983117.
2. Ahlfeld, D. P., Mulvey, J. M., Pinder, G. F., 1988. Contaminated Groundwater Remediation Design Using Simulation, Optimization, and Sensitivity Theory: 2. Analysis of a Field Site. Water Resour. Res., 24(3): 443-452, doi: 10. 1029/WR024i003p00443.
3. Baddari, K., Aïfa, T., Djarfour, N., et al., 2009. Application of a Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Network to Seismic Data Inversion. Computat. Geosci., 35(12): 2338-2344, doi: 10. 1016/j. cageo. 2009. 03. 006.
4. Bear, J., 2007. Hydraulics of Groundwater. Dover Publications, New York. 67.
5. Carnicer, J. M., 2008. Interpolation and Reconstruction of Curves and Surfaces. Rev. Real Academia de Ciencias. Zaragoza., 63: 7-40.
6. Chatterjee, K., Fang, K. T., Qin, H., 2006. A Lower Bound for the Centered L 2-Discrepancy on Asymmetric Factorials and Its Application. Metrika, 63(2): 243-255, doi: 10. 1007/s00184-005-0015-x.
7. Chen, S., Cowan, C. F. N., Grant, P. M., 1991. Orthogonal Least Squares Learning Algorithm for Radial Basis Function Networks. Proceedings of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2: 302-309, doi: 10. 1109/72. 80341.
8. Ciocoiu, I. B., 2002. RBF Networks Training Using a Dual Extended Kalman Filter. Neurocomputing, 48(1-4): 609-622, doi: 10. 1016/S0925-2312(01)00631-2.
9. Delshad, M., Pope, G. A., Sepehrnoori, K., 1996. A Compositional Simulator for Modeling Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Remediation, 1 Formulation. J. Contam. Hydrol., 23(4): 303-327, doi: 10. 1016/0169-7722(95)00106-9.
10. Fen, C. S., Chan, C., Cheng, H. C., 2009. Assessing a Response Surface-Based Optimization Approach for Soil Vapor Extraction System Design. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 135(3): 198-207, doi: 10. 1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135: 3(198).
11. Fernandez-Garcia, D., Bolster, D., Sanchez-Vila, X., et al., 2012. A Bayesian Approach to Integrate Temporal Data into Probabilistic Risk Analysis of Monitored NAPL Remediation. Advances in Water Resources, 36: 108-120, doi: 10. 1016/j. advwatres. 2011. 07. 001.
12. Fetter, C. W., 1999. Contaminant Hydrogeology. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. 208-262.
13. Guan, J., Aral, M., 1999. Optimal Remediation with Well Locations and Pumping Rates Selected as Continuous Decision Variables. J. Hydrol., 221(1-2): 20-42, doi: 10. 1016/S0022-1694(99)00079-7.
14. He, L., Huang, G. H., Zeng, G. M., et al., 2008. An Integrated Simulation, Inference, and Optimization Method for Identifying Groundwater Remediation Strategies at Petroleum-Contaminated Aquifers in Western Canada. Water Res., 42(10-11): 2629-2639, doi: 10. 1016/j. watres. 2008. 01. 012.
15. Helton, J. C., Davis, F. J., 2003. Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 81(1): 23-69, doi: 10. 1016/S0951-8320(03)00058-9.
16. Helton, J. C., Davis, F. J., Johnson, J. D., 2005. A Comparison of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Results Obtained with Random and Latin Hypercube Sampling. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 89(3): 305-330, doi: 10. 1016/j. ress. 2004. 09. 006.
17. Hora, S. C., Helton, J. C., 2003. A Distribution-Free Test for the Relationship between Model Input and Output when Using Latin Hypercube Sampling. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 79(3): 333-339, doi: 10. 1016/S0951-8320(02)00240-5.
18. Huang, Y., Li, J., Huang, G., et al., 2003. Integrated Simulation-Optimization Approach for Real-Time Dynamic Modeling and Process Control of Surfactant-Enhanced Remediation at Petroleum-Contaminated Sites. Pract. Period Hazard Toxic Radioact. Waste Manag. (ASCE), 7(2): 95-105, doi: 10. 1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2003)7: 2(95).
19. Johnson, V. M., Rogers, L. L., 2000. Accuracy of Neural Network Approximators in Simulation-Optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 126(2): 48-65, doi: 10. 1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126: 2(48).
20. Kegl, B., Krzyak, A., Niemann, H., 2000. Radial Basis Function Networks and Complexity Regularization in Function Learning and Classification. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2: 81-86, doi: 10. 1109/ICPR. 2000. 906022.
21. Kuiper, L. K., Illangasekare, T. K., 1998. Numerical Simulation of NAPL Flow in the Subsurface. Computat. Geosci., 2(3): 171-189.
22. Liu, L., 2005. Modeling for Surfactant-Enhanced Groundwater Remediation Processes at DNAPLs-Contaminated Sites. J. Environ. Inform., 5(2): 42-52, doi: 10. 3808/jei. 200500045.
23. Liu, W. H., Medina M. A. Jr., Thomann, W., et al., 2000. Optimization of Intermittent Pumping Schedules for Aquifer Remediation Using a Genetic Algorithm 1. J. Am. Leather Chem. As., 36(6): 1335-1348, doi: 10. 1111/j. 1752-1688. 2000. tb05730. x.
24. McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., Conover, W., 1979. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics, 21(2): 239-245, doi: 10. 2307/1268522.
25. Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., et al., 2004. Improved Streamflow Forecasting Using Self-Organizing Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Networks. J. Hydrol., 295(1-4): 246-262, doi: 10. 1016/j. jhydrol. 2004. 03. 027.
26. NRC, 1994. Alternatives for Groundwater Clean up. National Academy Press, Washington DC. 1-316.
27. Olsson, A., Sandberg, G., Dahlblom, O., 2003. On Latin Hypercube Sampling for Structural Reliability Analysis. Struct. Saf., 25(1): 47-68, doi: 10. 1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-5.
28. Pan, W., 2003. The Research and Application of the Online Algorithms: [Dissertation]. Jilin University, Changchun. 1-61 (in Chinese with English Abstract).
29. Pennell, K. D., Jin, M., Abriola, L. M., et al., 1994. Surfactant Enhanced Remediation of Soil Columns Contaminated by Residual Tetrachloroethylene. J. Contam. Hydrol., 16(1): 35-53, doi: 10. 1016/0169-7722(94)90071-X.
30. Petelet, M., Iooss, B., Asserin, O., et al., 2010. Latin Hypercube Sampling with Inequality Constraints. Asta. Adv. Stat. Anal., 94(4): 325-339, doi: 10. 1007/s10182-010-0144-z.
31. Powell, M. J. D., 1987. Radial Basis Functions for Multivariable Interpolation: A Review. Algorithms for Approximation, 143-167.
32. Qin, X. S., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., et al., 2007. Simulation-Based Process Optimization for Surfactant-Enhanced Aquifer Remediation at Heterogeneous DNAPL-Contaminated Sites. Sci. Total Environ., 381(1-3): 17-37, doi: 10. 1109/ICIII. 2009. 597.
33. Rathfelder, K. M., Abriola, L. M., Taylor, T. P., et al., 2001. Surfactant Enhanced Recovery of Tetrachloroethylene from a Porous Medium Containing Low Permeability Lenses. 2. Numerical Simulation. J. Contam. Hydrol., 48(3-4): 351-374, doi: 10. 1016/S0169-7722(00)00186-8.
34. Rogers, L. L., Dowla, F. U., Johnson, V. M., 1995. Optimal Field-Scale Groundwater Remediation Using Neural Networks and the Genetic Algorithm. Environ. Sci. Techno., 29(5): 1145-1155, doi: 10. 1021/es00005a003.
35. Schaerlaekens, J., Mertens, J., van Linden, J., et al., 2006. A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Surfactant-Enhanced Remediation of DNAPL Contaminations. J. Contam. Hydrol., 86(3-4): 176-194, doi: 10. 1016/j. jconhyd. 2006. 03. 002.
36. Schumaker, M. F., Kramer, D. M., 2011. Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulations of Cytochrome B6f with Experiment Using Latin Hypercube Sampling. Bull. Math. Biol., 73(9): 2152-2174, doi: 10. 1007/s11538-010-9616-2.
37. Shen, W., Guo, X., Wu, C., et al., 2010. Forecasting Stock Indices Using Radial Basis Function Neural Networks Optimized by Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst., 3(24): 378-385, doi: 10. 1016/j. knosys. 2010. 11. 001.
38. Sreekanth, J., Datta, B., 2010. Multi-Objective Management of Saltwater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers Using Genetic Programming and Modular Neural Network Based Surrogate Models. Journal of Hydrology, 393(3-4): 245-256, doi: 10. 1016/j. jhydrol. 2010. 08. 023.
39. van Camp, M., Walraevens, K., 2009. Pumping Test Interpretation by Combination of Latin Hypercube Parameter Sampling and Analytical Models. Computat. Geosci., 35(10): 2065-2073, doi: 10. 1016/j. cageo. 2008. 12. 011.
40. Yan, S., Minsker, B., 2006. Optimal Groundwater Remediation Design Using an Adaptive Neural Network Genetic Algorithm. Water Resour. Res., 42(5): 1145-1155, doi: 10. 1029/2005WR004303.
41. Yan, S., Minsker, B., 2011. Applying Dynamic Surrogate Models in Noisy Genetic Algorithms to Optimize Groundwater Remediation Designs. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 137: 284-292, doi: 10. 1061/(ASCE)WR. 1943-5452. 0000106.
42. Zhong, L. R., Mayer, A. S., Pope, G. A., 2003. The Effects of Surfactant Formulation on Nonequilibrium NAPL Solubilization. J. Contam. Hydrol., 60(1-2): 55-75, doi: 10. 1016/S0169-7722(02)00063-3.