A multi-objective optimization framework for surfactant-enhanced remediation of DNAPL contaminations

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Volumn 86, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 176-194

  Schaerlaekens, Jan ^a   Mertens, Jan ^a   Van Linden, Jan ^b   Vermeiren, Gert ^b   Carmeliet, Jan ^a   Feyen, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b URS Belgium ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

DNAPL; Multi objective optimization; Surfactant enhanced remediation; UTCHEM

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; CONTAMINATION; EXTRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POTABLE WATER; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

DENSE NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID (DNAPL); MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SURFACTANT-ENHANCED REMEDIATION; UTCHEM;

WATER TREATMENT;

SURFACTANT;

AQUIFERS; CONTAMINATION; EXTRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POTABLE WATER; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; WATER TREATMENT;

CALIBRATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRINKING WATER; OPTIMIZATION; POLLUTION; REMEDIATION; SURFACTANT;

ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CALIBRATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTAMINATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EXTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WATER MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PILOT PROJECTS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

BELGIUM; BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33746210143     PISSN: 01697722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brooks R.H., and Corey A.T. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrol. Pap. vol. 3 (1964), Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO
2. Brown C.L., Delshad M., Dwarakanath V., McKinney D.C., and Pope G.A. Design of a field-scale surfactant enhanced remediation of a DNAPL contaminated aquifer. Presented at the I&EC Special Symposium of the American Chemical Society, Birmingham, AL, US (1996)
3. Delshad, M., Delshad, M., Bhuyan, D., Pope, G.A., Lake, L., 1986. Effect of capillary number on the residual saturation of a three-phase micellar solution. SPE 14911, Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Fifth Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, US, April 20-23.
4. Delshad M., Pope G.A., and Sepehrnoori K. A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation, 1 Formulation. J. Contam. Hydrol. 23 (1996) 303-327
5. Duan Q., Sorooshian S., and Gupta V.K. Effective and efficient global optimisation for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res. 28 (1992) 1015-1031
6. Duan Q., Sorooshian S., and Gupta V.K. Optimal use of the SEC-UA global optimisation method for calibrating watershed models. J. Hydrol. 158 (1994) 265-284
7. Fountain J.C., Klimek A., Beikirch M.G., and Middleton T.M. The use of surfactants for in situ extraction of organic pollutants from a contaminated aquifer. J. Hazard. Mater. 28 (1991) 295-311
8. Gupta V.K., Sorooshian S., and Yapo P.O. Towards improved calibration of hydrological models: multiple and non-commensurable measures of information. Water Resour. Res. 34 (1998) 751-763
9. Hirasaki G.J. Application of the theory of multicomponent, multiphase displacement to three-component, two-phase surfactant flooding. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (1981) 191-204
10. Huh C. Interfacial tension and solubilizing ability of a microemulsion phase that coexists with oil and brine. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 71 (1979) 408-428
11. In-Situ Systems GmbH, 2002. Remediation scenario development. Lab and desk study. Stralsund, August 2002.
12. Istok, J.D., Field, J.A, 1999. In-situ, field scale evaluation of surfactant-enhanced DNAPL recovery using a single-well, "push-pull" test. Final report, project number: 55196-OR, US.
13. ITRC. Dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs): review of emerging characterization and remediation technologies (2000), Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation Work Group, Washington, DC, USA
14. Klute, A., 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agr. Monogr., ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 635-662.
15. Liu Y., and Minsker B.S. Full multiscale approach for optimal control of in-situ bioremediation. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 130 (2004) 26-32
16. Mackay D.M., and Cherry J.A. Groundwater contamination: pump-and-treat remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23 (1989) 630-636
17. Madsen H. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. J. Hydrol. (2000) 235-288
18. Madsen H. Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Adv. Water Resour. 26 (2003) 205-216
19. Mayer A.S., Kelley C.T., and Miller C.T. Optimal design for problems involving ?ow and transport phenomena in saturated subsurface systems. Adv. Water Resour. 25 (2002) 1233-1256
20. Mertens J., Madsen H., Feyen L., Jacques D., and Feyen J. Including prior information in the estimation of effective soil parameters in unsaturated zone modelling. J. Hydrol. 294 (2004) 251-269
21. Minsker B.S., and Shoemaker C.A. Computational issues for optimal in-situ bioremediation design. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 124 (1998) 39-46
22. Nelder J.A., and Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7 (1965) 308-313
23. Oostrom M., Hofstee C., Walker R.C., and Dane J.H. Movement and remediation of trichloroethylene in a saturated heterogeneous porous medium. 1. Spill behavior and initial dissolution. J. Contam. Hydrol. 37 (1999) 159-178
24. Oostrom M., Hofstee C., Walker R.C., and Dane J.H. Movement and remediation in a saturated heterogeneous porous medium. 2. Pump-and-treat tests and surfactant flushing. J. Contam. Hydrol. 37 (1999) 179-197
25. Pankow J.F., and Cherry J.A. Dense Chlorinated Solvents and other DNAPLs in Groundwater (1996), Waterloo Press, Portland, OR, USA
26. Pareto V. Manual of Political Economy. orig. 1906 in Italian; 1927 in French; 1971 transl. Ann S. Schwier (1927), Augustus M. Kelley, New York
27. Perry R.H., and Chilton C.H. Chemical Engineers Handbook (1973), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA
28. Pope G.A., and Nelson R.C. A chemical flooding compositional simulator. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 18 (1978) 339-354
29. Rosen M.J. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena. 2nd edn (1989), Wiley, New York, NY, USA
30. Schaerlaekens, J., 2002. Experimental and numerical analysis of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation of a residual DNAPL saturation. PhD dissertation, Faculty for Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 221 pp.
31. Schaerlaekens J., Vanderborght J., Merckx R., and Feyen J. Surfactant-enhanced solubilization of residual trichloroethylene: an experimental and numerical analysis. J. Contam. Hydrol. 46 (2000) 1-16
32. Schwille F. Dense Chlorinated Solvents in Porous and Fractured Media Model Experiments. English Language Edition (1988), Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI 146 pp.
33. Shoemaker C.A., and Yoon J.-H. Identifying cost-effective Groundwater bioremediation designs with an improved real-coded genetic algorithm. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. J. Comput. 15 (2000) 224-231
34. Spear R.C., and Hornberger G.M. Eutrophication in peel inlet: II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis. Water Resour. Res. 14 (1980) 43-49
35. Tayler T.P., Pennell K.D., Abriola L.A., and Dane J.H. Surfactant enhanced recovery of tetrachloroethylene from a porous medium containing low permeability lenses: 1. Experimental studies. J. Contam. Hydrol. 48 (2001) 325-350
36. URS, Dames and Moore Belgium, 2001. Soil Remediation Report (in Dutch). August 2001.
37. URS Belgium, 2002. Estimate delineation pure DNAPL zones (in Dutch). October 2002. Ref. P371-GV.
38. Walker R.C., Hofstee C., Dane J.H., and Hill W.E. Surfactant enhanced removal of PCE in a nominally two-dimensional, saturated, stratified porous medium. J. Contam. Hydrol. 34 (1998) 17-30
39. Wilke C.R., and Chang P. Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions. Aiche J. 1 (1955) 264-270