Retention strategies in longitudinal studies with emerging adults

Clinical Nurse Specialist

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 41-45

  Hanna, Kathleen M ^a   Scott, Linda L ^a   Schmidt, Karen K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

emerging adults; longitudinal study; retention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY;

ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES;

EID: 84890337092     PISSN: 08876274     EISSN: 15389782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000020     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA:Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2008.
2. Dennissen JJA, Asendorpf JB, van Aken MAG. Childhood personality predicts long-term trajectories of shyness and aggressiveness in the context of demographic transitions in emerging adulthood. J Pers. 2008;76(1):67-99.
3. Roisman GI, Masten AS, Coatsworth JD, Tellegen A. Salient and emerging developmental tasks in the transition to adulthood. Child Dev. 2004;75(1):123-133.
4. White HR, Bray BC, Fleming CB, Catalano RF. Transitions into and out of light and intermittent smoking during emerging adulthood. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(2):211-219.
5. Galambos NL,Krahn HJ.Depression and anger trajectories during the transition to adulthood. J Marriage Fam. 2008;70:15-27.
6. Pettit JW, Roberts RE, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Yaroslavsky I. Developmental relations between perceived social support and depressive symptoms through emerging adulthood: blood is thicker than water. J Fam Psychol. 2011;25(1):127-136.
7. Cotter RB, Burke JD, Loeber R, Navratil JL. Innovative retention methods in longitudinal research: a case study of the developmental trends study. J Child Fam Stud. 2002;11(4):485-498.
8. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: what is it, and what is it good for? Child Dev Perspect. 2007;1(2):68-73.
9. Aseltine RH, Gore S. Mental health and social adaptation following the transition from high school. J Res Adolesc. 1993;3(3): 247-270.
10. Furstenberg FF Jr, Rumbaut RC, Settersten RA Jr. On the frontier of adulthood: emerging themes and newdirections. In: Settersten RA, Furstenberg FF, Rumbaut RG, eds. On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2005:3-25.
11. Blum RW, Garell D, Hodgman CH, et al. Transition from childcentered to adult health-care systems for adolescents with chronic conditions. A position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 1993;14(7):570-576.
12. McFarlane J. Strategies for successful recruitment and retention of abused women for longitudinal studies. Issues MentHealth Nurs. 2007;28(8):883-897.
13. Peters A, Laffel L. Diabetes care for emerging adults: recommendations for transition from pediatric to adult diabetes care systems. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2477-2485.
14. Hanna KM. A framework for the youthwith type 1 diabetes during the emerging adulthood transition. Nurs Outlook. 2012;60(6):401-410.
15. Insabella G, Grey M, Knafl G, Tamborlane W. The transition to young adulthood in youthwith type 1 diabetes on intensive treatment. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8(4):228-234.
16. Bryden KS, Peveler RC, Stein A, Neil A, Mayou RA, Dunger DB. Clinical and psychological course of diabetes from adolescence to young adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(9):1536-1540.
17. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulindependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr. 1994;125(2):177-188.
18. StupianskyNW, HannaKM, SlavenJE,WeaverMT, Fortenberry JD. Impulse control, diabetes-specific self-efficacy, and diabetesmanagement among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38(3):247-254.
19. Lyons KS, Carter JH, Carter EH, Rush KN, Stewart BJ, Archbold PG. Locating and retaining research participants for follow-up studies. Res Nurs Health. 2004;27(1):63-68.
20. Butterfield PG, Yates SM, Rogers B, Healow JM. Overcoming subject recruitment challenges: strategies for successful collaboration with novice research agencies. Appl Nurs Res. 2003;16(1):46-52.
21. Tansey CM,Matte AL, Needham D, Herridge MS. Reviewof retention strategies in longitudinal studies and application to follow-up of ICU survivors. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(12):2051-2057.
22. Hanna KM. Effect of nurse-client transaction on female adolescents oral contraceptive adherence. Image J Nurs Scholarsh. 1993;25(4):285-290.
23. TwitchellGR, Hertzog CA, Klein JL, Schuckit MA. The anatomy of a follow-up. Br J Addict. 1992;87(9):1327-1333.
24. Woolard RH, Carty K, Wirtz P, et al. Research fundamentals: follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: addressing subject attrition. Acad Emergy Med. 2004;11(8):859-866.
25. Kypri K, Gallagher SJ, Cashell-Smith ML. An Internet-based survey method for college student drinking research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;76(1):45-53.
26. BorzekowskiDL, Rickert VI, Ipp L, Fortenberry JD. Atwhat price? The current state of subject payment in adolescent research. J Adolesc Health. 2003;33(5):378-384.
27. Donaldson GW, Moinpour CM, Bush NE, et al. Physician participation in research surveys. A randomized study of inducements to return mailed research questionnaires. Eval Health Prof. 1999; 22(4):427-441.
28. Kalantar JS, Talley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(11):1117-1122.
29. Jones R. Survey data collection using Audio Computer Assisted Self-interview. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25(3):349-358.
30. WebbPM, ZimetGD, Fortenberry JD, BlytheMJ. Comparability of a computer-assisted versus written method for collecting health behavior information from adolescent patients. J Adolesc Health. 1999;24(6):383-388.
31. Ellen JM, Gurvey JE, Pasch L, Tschann J, Nanda JP, Catania J. A randomized comparison of A-CASI and phone interviewsto assess STD/HIV-related risk behaviors in teens. J Adolesc Health. 2002; 31(1):26-30.
32. Williams ML, Freeman RC, Bowen AM, Saunders L. The acceptability of a computer HIV/AIDS risk assessment to not-intreatment drug users. AIDS Care. 1998;10(6):701-711.
33. Kurth AE, Martin DP, Golden MR, et al. A comparison between audio computer-assisted self-interviews and clinician interviews for obtaining the sexual history. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31(12): 719-726.
34. Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2):294-297.
35. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reportingwith computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280(5365): 867-873.
36. Cote J, Bynner JM. Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UK and Canada: the role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood. J Youth Stud. 2008;11(3):251-268.