Scenario uncertainties in estimating direct land-use change emissions in biomass-to-energy life cycle assessment

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 47, Issue , 2012, Pages 240-249

  Curtright, Aimee E ^a   Johnson, David R ^a   Willis, Henry H ^a   Skone, Timothy ^b  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Biofuels; Greenhouse gas emissions; Land use change; Life cycle assessment; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; CARBON; FORESTRY; GAS EMISSIONS; GEOMETRY; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE CYCLE; ORGANIC CARBON; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ABOVE GROUND BIOMASS; BIO-ENERGY; BIOMASS PRODUCTIONS; DECISION MAKERS; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; LAND-USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); SOIL ORGANIC CARBON;

LAND USE; BIOFUELS;

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; EMERGY; EMISSION INVENTORY; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; BIOMASS POWER; DATA SET; DECISION MAKING; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ESTIMATION METHOD; FOSSIL FUEL; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84870682340     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.037     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Yacobucci B.D. Biofuels incentives: a summary of federal programs 2010, Congressional Research Service (CRS).
2. EPA, U.S.E.P.A. renewable fuel standard (RFS) 2010 [cited 2011 April 20, 2011]; Available from:. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm.
3. N.C.S.C.a.t.I.R.E.C.I. Database of state incentives for renewables & efficiency (DSIRE) 2011, North Carolina State University, Available from:. http://www.dsireusa.org/.
4. Fargione J., Plevin R.J., Hill J.D. The ecological impact of biofuels. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2010, 41(1):351-377.
5. Tilman D., Socolow R., Foley J., Hill J., Larson E., Lynd L., et al. Beneficial biofuels-the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 2009, 325(5938):270-271.
6. Schubert R. Future bioenergy and sustainable land use 2009, Earthscan/James & James.
7. Fargione J., Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 2008, 319(5867):1235-1238.
8. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008, 319(5867):1238-1240.
9. Tilman D., Hill J., Lehman C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 2006, 314(5805):1598-1600.
10. Dale V.H., Kline K., Wright L., Perlack R., Downing M., Graham R. Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use. Ecol Appl 2011, 21(4):1039-1054.
11. Tyner WE, Taheripour F, Zhuang Q, Birur D, Baldos U. Land use changes and consequent CO2 emissions due to US corn ethanol production: a comprehensive analysis. GTAP Resource; 2010, p. 3288.
12. Wang M.Q., Han J., Haq Z., Tyner W.E., Wu M., Elgowainy A. Energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of corn and cellulosic ethanol with technology improvements and land use changes. Biomass Bioenergy 2011.
13. Mullins K.A., Griffin W.M., Matthews H.S. Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 45(1):132-138.
14. Johnson D.R., Willis H.H., Curtright A.E., Samaras C., Skone T. Incorporating uncertainty analysis into life cycle estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from biomass production. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35(7):2619-2626.
15. McKone T.E., Nazaroff W.W., Berck P., Auffhammer M., Lipman T., Torn M.S. Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45(5):1925-1944.
16. Cherubini F., Strømman A.H. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102(2):437-451.
17. Kim H., Kim S., Dale B.E. Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43(3):961-967.
18. McLauchlan K. The nature and longevity of agricultural impacts on soil carbon and nutrients: a review. Ecosystems 2006, 9(8):1364-1382.
19. 2 from land-use change?. Tellus B 2010, 62(5):337-351.
20. Batlle-Aguilar J., Brovelli A., Porporato A., Barry D. Modelling soil carbon and nitrogen cycles during land use change. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 2011, 31(2):251-274.
21. Don A., Schumacher J., Freibauer A. Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks - a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 2011, 17(4):1658-1670.
22. Andress D. Soil carbon changes for bioenergy crops 2002, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy by David Andress and Associates, Kensington, Maryland.
23. Guo L.B., Gifford R.M. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Glob Change Biol 2002, 8(4):345-360.
24. Knops J.M.H., Tilman D. Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 2000, 81(1):88-98.
25. Blanco-Canqui H. Energy crops and their implications on soil and environment. Agron J 2010, 102(2):403-419.
26. McLauchlan K.K., Hobbie S.E., Post W.M. Conversion from agriculture to grassland builds soil organic matter on decadal timescales. Ecol Appl 2006, 16(1):143-153.
27. West T.O., Post W.M. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2002, 66(6):1930-1946.
28. Blanco-Canqui H., Lal R. Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2009, 28(3):139-163.
29. Anderson-Teixeira K.J., Davis S.C., Masters M.D., Delucia E.H. Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops. GCB Bioenergy 2009, 1(1):75-96.
30. Baker J.M., et al. Tillage and soil carbon sequestration - what do we really know?. Agric Ecosys Environ 2007, 118(1-4):1-5.
31. Blanco-Canqui H.L. No-tillage and soil-profile carbon sequestration: an on-farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2008, 72(3):693.
32. Causarano HJ, Doraiswamy PC, McCarty GW, Hatfield JL, Milak S, Stern AJ. EPIC modeling of soil organic carbon sequestration in croplands of Iowa; 2008.
33. Gal A., Vyn T.J., Micheli E., Kladivko E.J., McFee W.W. Soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation with long-term no-till versus moldboard plowing overestimated with tilled-zone sampling depths. Soil Tillage Res 2007, 96(1-2):42-51.
34. Virto I., Barré P., Burlot A., Chenu C. Carbon input differences as the main factor explaining the variability in soil organic C storage in no-tilled compared to inversion tilled agrosystems. Biogeochemistry 2011, 1-10.
35. Sun B., Hallett P., Caul S., Daniell T., Hopkins D. Distribution of soil carbon and microbial biomass in arable soils under different tillage regimes. Plant Soil 2011, 338(1):17-25.
36. Govaerts B., Verhulst N., Castellanos-Navarrete A., Sayre K.D., Dixon J., Dendooven L. Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: between myth and farmer reality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2009, 28(3):97-122.
37. Davidson E.A., Ackerman I.L. Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils. Biogeochemistry 1993, 20(3):161-193.
38. O'Hare M., Plevin R.J., Martin J.I., Jones A.D., Kendall A., Hopson E. Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels' greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum. Environ Res Lett 2009, 4(2):024001.
39. Colorado State University (CSU) Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory. DayCent: Daily Century Model. Undated [cited 2012 March 17]; Available from: http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/daycent/index.html.
40. EPA, U.S.E.P.A. EPA lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable fuels: technical highlights; 2009.
41. Lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions due to increased biofuel production: methods and approaches to account for lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels production over time: peer review report 2009, ICF International.
42. Anderson-Teixeira K.J., DeLucia E.H. The greenhouse gas value of ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 2011, 17(1):425-438.
43. Levasseur A., Lesage P., Margni M., Deschenes L., Samson R. Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44(8):3169-3174.
44. Golub A., Hertel T.W., Taheripour F., Tyner W.E. Modeling biofuels policies in general equilibrium: insights, pitfalls, and opportunities. New developments in computable general equilibrium analysis for trade policy (frontiers of economics and globalization, volume 7) 2010, vol. 7. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, p. 153-187.
45. Kim C., Schaible G., Daberkow S. The relative impacts of US bio-fuel policies on fuel-energy markets: a comparative static analysis 2010.
46. Oladosu G, Kline K. The role of modeling assumptions and policy instruments in evaluating the global implications of US biofuel policies. in: 33rd IAEE International Conference "The Future of Energy: Global Challenges, Diverse Solutions" ; 2010, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
47. Plevin R.J., Michael O'H., Jones A.D., Torn M.S., Gibbs H.K. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44(21):8015-8021.