Ethics is for human subjects too: Participant perspectives on responsibility in health research

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 98, Issue , 2013, Pages 224-231

  Cox, Susan M ^a   McDonald, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Narratives; Participant perspectives; Protection of human subjects; Research ethics; Responsibility

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN RIGHTS; MEDICAL GEOGRAPHY; RESEARCH WORK;

ARTICLE; BIOTYPOLOGY; CANADA; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION;

CANADA;

CANADA; NARRATIVES; PARTICIPANT PERSPECTIVES; PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESPONSIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CANADA; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NARRATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890233451     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abadie R. The professional guinea pig: Big pharma and the risky world of human subjects 2010, Duke University Press.
2. Albrecht T.L., Ruckdeschel J.C., Riddle D.L., Blanchard C.G., Penner L.A., Coovert M.D., et al. Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials. Patient Education and Counseling 2003, 50(1):39-42.
3. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis 2006, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
4. Corrigan O.P. Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent. Sociology of Health and Illness 2003, 25(7):768-792.
5. Corrigan O., Tutton R. Volunteer research subjects' experience of participation in research on a novel diagnostic technology for breast cancer. Qualitative Health Research 2010, 20:81-92.
6. Cox S.M., Ross K., Townsend A., Woodgate R. From stakeholders to shareholders: consumer collaborators in health research. Health Law Review 2011, 19(3):63-71.
7. Cruikshank J. Life lived like a story: Life stories of three Yukon native elders 1990, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
8. Emmanuel E., Wood A., Fleischman A., Bowen A., Getz K., Grady C., et al. Oversight of human participants research: identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004, 141(4):282-291.
9. Felt U., Bister M., Strassnig M., Wagner U. Refusing the information paradigm: informed consent, medical research, and patient participation. Health 2009, 13:87-106.
10. Fisher J.A. Practicing research ethics: private-sector physicians & pharmaceutical clinical trials. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 66:2495-2505.
11. Frank A.W. The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics 1995, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Frank A.W. Letting stories breathe: A socio-narratology 2010, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
13. Gelsinger P., Shamoo A.E. Eight years after Jesse's death, are human research subjects any safer?. The Hastings Center Report 2008, 38(2):25-27.
14. Grady C. Do IRB's protect human research participants?. Journal of the American Medical Association 2010, 304(10):1122-1123.
15. Hampson L.A., Agrawal M., Joffe S., Gross C.P., Verter J., Emanuel E.J. Patients' views on financial conflicts of interest in cancer research trials. New England Journal of Medicine 2006, 355(22):2330-2337.
16. Kass N.E., Sugarman J. Are research subjects adequately protected? A review and discussion of studies conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1996, 6(3):271-282.
17. Katz A., Fox K. The process of informed consent: What's at stake 2004, Report prepared for Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School.
18. Lafrenière D., Cox S.M. Comparing two methods of knowledge dissemination: the Café Scientifique and the artistic performance. Sociology Mind 2012, 2(2):191-199.
19. Lafrenière D., Cox S.M. "If You can call it a poem": criteria for assessing research poetry used as a means of data representation. Qualitative Research 2012, 1-19. 10.1177/14687941124 M46104.
20. Lafrenière D., Cox S.M., Belliveau G., Graham L. Arts-based knowledge dissemination methods in health research: performing and displaying the human subject. Journal of Applied Arts and Health 2013, 3(3):243-257.
21. McDonald M., Cox S.M. Moving towards evidence-based human participant protection. Journal of Academic Ethics 2009, 7(1):1-16.
22. McDonald M., Cox S.M., Townsend A. Towards human research protection that is evidence-based and participant-centered. The future of human research regulation 2013, MIT Press, in press. I.G. Cohen, H.F. Lynch (Eds.).
23. McDonald M., Townsend A., Cox S., Lafrenière D., Paterson N.D. Trust in health research relationships: accounts of human subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2008, 3(4):35-47.
24. Morris N., Balmer B. Volunteer human subjects' understandings of their participation in a biomedical research experiment. Social Science & Medicine 2006, 62:998-1008.
25. Pope J., Tingey D., Malcolm A.J., Hong P., Ouimet J., Krizova A. Are subjects satisfied with the informed consent process? A survey of research participants. Journal of Rheumatology 2003, 30:815-824.
26. Rothman D.J. Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and ethics transformed medical decision making 1991, Basic Books.
27. Stark L. Behind closed doors: IRBs and the making of ethical research 2012, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
28. Strauss A., Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. Handbook of qualitative research 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
29. Townsend A., Amarsi Z., Backman C., Cox S.M., Li L.C. Communications between volunteers and health researchers during recruitment and informed consent: qualitative content analysis of email interactions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2011, (4):e84.
30. Townsend A., Cox S.M. Accessing health services through the back door: reasons why people participate in health research. Journal Medical Ethics 2013, in press.
31. Walker G., de Valois B., Davies R., Young T., Maher J. Opinions of research participants about study paperwork. Bulletin of Medical Ethics 2005, 205:21-24.