Moving toward evidence-based human participant protection

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-16

  McDonald, Michael ^a   Cox, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canadian research ethics; Evidence; Health research; Human participant protection

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649617158     PISSN: 15701727     EISSN: 15728544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-009-9082-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Beagan, B., & McDonald, M. (2005). Evidence-based practice of ethics review. Health Law Review, 13(2-3), 62-68.
2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (1998, with 2000, 2002, and 2005 amendments). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
3. Civil Code of Québec (C. C. Q.), S. Q. (1991). c. 64.
4. Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 335.
5. Corrigan, O., & Tutton, R. (2006). What's in a name? Subjects, volunteers, participants and activists in clinical research. Clinical Ethics, 1(2), 101-104.
6. Cox, S., & McDonald, M. (2007). Research on research ethics: must the ethics researcher become an ethics cop, consultant, or conduit? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(1), 94-95.
7. Cox, S., Kazubowski-Houston, M., & Nisker, J. (2009). Genetics on stage: public engagement in health policy development on preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine, 68(8), 1472-1480.
8. Dyregrov, K. (2004). Bereaved parent's experience of research participation. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 391-400.
9. Emanuel, E., Wood, A., Fleischman, A., Bowen, A., Getz, K., Grady, C., et al. (2004). Oversight of human participants research: identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(4), 282-291.
10. Enzle, M. E., & Schmaltz, R. (2005). Ethics review of multi-centre clinical trials in Canada. Health Law Review, 13(2& 3), 51-57.
11. Felt, U., Milena, D., Strassnig, M., & Wagner, U. (2009). Refusing the information paradigm: informed consent, medical research, and patient participation. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness & Medicine, 13, 87-106.
12. FRSQ, Comité d'éthique de la recherche et d'intégrité scientifique du FRSQ, FRSQ Standards on Human Health Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity, (Québec: Fonds de la Recherche en santé du Québec, July 2008).
13. Fry, C. (2008). A comprehensive evidence-based approach is needed for promoting participation in health research: a commentary on Williams. Social Science & Medicine, 66(7), 1457-1460.
14. Health Research Ethics Authority Act, S. N. L. (2006). c. H-1. 2.
15. Hébert, P., & Saginur, R. (2009). Research ethics review: do it once and do it well. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(6), 597.
16. Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D., Elliott, M. N., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2008). Is there a better way to ask patients whether there is "anything else"? The Journal of Family Practice, 57(3), 149.
17. Jay, F., Chantler, T., Lees, A., & Pollard, A. J. (2007). Children's participation in vaccine research: parents' views. Paediatric Nursing, 19(8), 14-18.
18. Katz, A., & Fox, K. (2004). The process of informed consent: What's at stake. Boston: Children's Hospital Boston.
19. Kimmelman, J., Weijer, C., & Meslin, E. M. (2009). Helsinki discords: FDA, ethics, and international drug trials. Lancet, 373(9657), 13-14.
20. Lavori, P. W., Sugarman, J., Hays, M. T., & Feussner, J. R. (1999). Improving informed consent in clinical trials: a duty to experiment. Controlled Clinical Trials, 20(2), 187-193.
21. Lenk, C., Radenbach, K., Dahl, M., & Wiesemann, C. (2004). Non-therapeutic research with minors: how do chairpersons of German research ethics committees decide? Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 85-87.
22. McDonald, M. (2005). Canadian governance for ethical research involving humans. Health Law Review, 13(2-3), 5-12.
23. McDonald, M. (2009). From code to policy statement: creating Canadian policy for ethical research involving humans. Health Law Review, 17(2-3), 12-25.
24. McDonald, M. et al. (2000). The Governance of Health Research Involving Human Subjects. Law Commission of Canada, Ottawa.
25. McDonald, M., Townsend, A., Cox, S., Damiano Paterson, N., & Lafreniere, D. (2008). Trust in health research relationships: accounts of human subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(4), 35-47.
26. Moreno, J. (2001). Goodbye to all that: the end of moderate protectionism in human subjects research. Hastings Center Report, 31(3), 9-17.
27. Morris, N., & Balmer, B. (2006). Volunteer human subjects' understandings of their participation in a biomedical research experiment. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 998-1008.
28. Morris, M. C., Nadkarni, V. M., Ward, F. R., & Nelson, R. M. (2004). Exception from informed consent for pediatric resuscitation research: community consultation for a trial of brain cooling after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Pediatrics, 114(3), 776-781.
29. Mulder, S., Rance, S., Suarez, M., & Condori, M. (2000). Unethical ethics? Reflections on intercultural research practices. Reproductive Health Matters, 8(15), 104-112.
30. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: New York Basic Books.
31. Riskin, A., Tamir, A., Kugelman, A., Hemo, M., & Bader, D. (2008). Is visual assessment a reliable way to estimate bilirubin levels? The Journal of Family Practice, 57(8), 504.
32. Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Hayes, R., & Richardson, W. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72.
33. Schuppli, C., & McDonald, M. (2005). Contrasting modes of governance for the protection of humans and animals in Canada: lessons for reform. Health Law Review, 13(2-3), 97-106.
34. Seltzer, S. E., Sullivan, D. C., Hillman, B. J., & Staab, E. V. (2002). Factors affecting patient enrollment in radiology clinical trials: a case study of the American college of radiology imaging network. Academic Radiology, 9(7), 862-869.
35. Shah, S., Whittle, A., Wilfond, B., Gensler, G, & Wendler, D. (2004) How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(4), 476-482.
36. Sieber, J. E. (2008). Earning trust. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(4), 1-3.
37. Sugarman, J. (2004). Determining the appropriateness of including children in clinical research: how thick is the ice? Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(4), 494-496.
38. Wagener, D., Sporer, A., Simmerling, M., Flome, J., An, C., & Curry, S. (2004). Human participants challenges in youth-focused research: perspectives and practices of IRB administrators. Ethics & Behavior, 14(4), 335-349.
39. Weinfurt, K. P., Hall, M. A., Friedman, J. Y., Hardy, C., Fortune-Greeley, A. K., Lawlor, J. S., et al. (2008). Effects of disclosing financial interests on participation in medical research: a randomized vignette trial. American Heart Journal, 156(4), 689-697.
40. Woodgate, R. L., & Edwards, M. (2008). Parents' and children's perspectives of the risks to involving children in research: It's a family affair. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Canadian Bioethics Society Conference. Retrieved.