A novel osteogenesis technique: The expansible guided bone regeneration

Journal of Tissue Engineering

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-10

  Zakaria, Osama ^a   Madi, Marwa ^a   Kasugai, Shohei ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bone induction; De novo bone; Expansible guided bone regeneration; Facilitated endogenous repair; In situ bone incubator; In vivo bone incubator; Supraosteal bone neogenesis; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

CELL ENGINEERING; REPAIR; SCREWS; SILICONES; TISSUE REGENERATION;

BONE INDUCTION; DE NOVO BONE; EXPANSIBLE GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; FACILITATED ENDOGENOUS REPAIR; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; IN SITU BONE INCUBATOR; IN VIVO BONE INCUBATOR; IN-VIVO; SUPRAOSTEAL BONE NEOGENESIS; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

BONE;

EID: 84890186546     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20417314     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2041731412441194     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Carstens MH, Chin M and Li XJ. In situ osteogenesis: regeneration of 10-cm mandibular defect in porcine model using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP- 2) and helistat absorbable collagen sponge. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16(6): 1033-1042.
2. Hutmacher DW and Sittinger M. Periosteal cells in bone tissue engineering [Review]. Tissue Eng 2003; 9(Suppl 1): S45-S64.
3. Ueda M, Yamada Y, Ozawa R, et al. Clinical case reports of injectable tissue-engineered bone for alveolar augmentation with simultaneous implant placement [Case Reports Research Support, Non-US Government]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25(2): 129-137.
4. Adachi N, Ochi M, Deie M, et al. Lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee after meniscectomy treated by the transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage and osteochondral plug [Case Reports]. Arthroscopy 2006; 22(1): 107-112.
5. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, et al. Osteochondral lesion located at the lateral femoral condyle reconstructed by the transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage in combination with a periosteum with bone block: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004; 12(5): 444-447.
6. Lysaght MJ and Hazlehurst AL. Tissue engineering: the end of the beginning. Tissue Eng 2004; 10(1-2): 309-320.
7. Evans CH, Palmer GD, Pascher A, et al. Facilitated endogenous repair: making tissue engineering simple, practical, and economical [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Review]. Tissue Eng 2007; 13(8): 1987-1993.
8. Archer R and Williams DJ. Why tissue engineering needs process engineering. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23(11): 1353-1355.
9. Simon TM, Van Sickle DC, Kunishima DH, et al. Cambium cell stimulation from surgical release of the periosteum [Research Support, Non-US Government]. J Orthop Res 2003; 21(3): 470-480.
10. Stevens MM, Marini RP, Schaefer D, et al. In vivo engineering of organs: the bone bioreactor [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-US Government]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102(32): 11450-11455.
11. Zakaria O, Kon K and Kasugai S. Evaluation of a biodegradable novel periosteal distractor. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012; 100(3): 882-889.
12. Schmidt BL, Kung L, Jones C, et al. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction [Research Support, Non-US Government]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60(10): 1170-1175.
13. Oda T, Kinoshita K and Ueda M. Effects of cortical bone perforation on periosteal distraction: an experimental study in the rabbit mandible [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-US Government]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67(7): 1478-1485.
14. Kessler P, Bumiller L, Schlegel A, et al. Dynamic periosteal elevation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45(4): 284-287.
15. Estrada JI, Saulacic N, Vazquez L, et al. Periosteal distraction osteogenesis: preliminary experimental evaluation in rabbits and dogs [Evaluation Studies]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45(5): 402-405.
16. Casap N, Venezia NB, Wilensky A, et al. VEGF facilitates periosteal distraction-induced osteogenesis in rabbits: a micro-computerized tomography study. Tissue Eng Part A 2008; 14(2): 247-253.
17. Weng D, Hürzeler MB, Quiñones CR, et al. Contribution of the periosteum to bone formation in guided bone regeneration. A study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11(6): 546-554.
18. Sencimen M, Aydintug YS, Ortakoglu K, et al. Histomorphometrical analysis of new bone obtained by distraction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by periosteal distraction in rabbits [Comparative Study Evaluation Studies]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36(3): 235-242.
19. Hämmerle CH, Schmid J, Lang NP, et al. Temporal dynamics of healing in rabbit cranial defects using guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53: 167-174.
20. Schmid J, Hammerle CH, Fluckiger L, et al. Blood-filled spaces with and without filler materials in guided bone regeneration. A comparative experimental study in the rabbit using bioresorbable membranes [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-US Government]. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8(2): 75-81.
21. Slotte C and Lundgren D. Augmentation of calvarial tissue using nonpermeable silicone domes and bovine bone mineral- an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10(6): 468-476.
22. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Tonetti M, et al. Long-term stability of autogenous bone grafts following combined application with guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 133-139.
23. Kostopoulos LK and Karring T. Guided bone regeneration in mandibular defects in rats using a bioresorbable polymer. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 66-74.
24. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, et al. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Max Impl 2006; 21(5): 696-710.
25. Simion M, Trisi P, Maglione M, et al. A preliminary report on a method for studying the permeability of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane to bacteria in vitro: a scanning electron microscopic and histological study. J Periodontol 1994; 65(8): 755-761.
26. Simion MT, Trisi P, Maglione M, et al. Bacterial penetration in-vitro through GTAM membrane with and without topical chlorhexidine application. A light and scanning electron-microscopic study. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22(4): 321-331.
27. Saulacic N, Schaller B, Bosshardt DD, et al. Periosteal distraction osteogenesis and barrier membrane application: an experimental study in the rat calvaria. J Periodontol. Epub ahead of print 7 November 2011. DOI: 10.1902/ jop.2011.110418.
28. Ono A, Motoyoshi M and Shimizu N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic miniimplants [Research Support, Non-US Government]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37(4): 334-340.
29. Lynch SE. Basic principles of scaffolds in tissue engineering. Scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In: Lynch SE, Marx RE, Nevins M, et al. (eds) Tissue engineering: applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery and periodontics. 2nd ed. Quintessence publishing Co, Inc., 2008, p.29.
30. Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(4): 489-496.
31. Sun Z. and Herring S W. The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-US Government]. Arch Oral Biol 2009; 54(3): 205-215.
32. Dahlin C H H and Linde A. Expression of growth factors during healing of rat mandibular trephine lesions treated by the osteopromotive membrane technique. PhD Thesis, University of Göteborg, Sweden, 1993, pp.51-63.
33. Linde A, Thoren C, Dahlin C, et al. Creation of new bone by an osteopromotive membrane technique: an experimental study in rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 892-897.
34. Lundgren D, Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, et al. Augmentation of intramembranous bone beyond the skeletal envelope using an occlusive titanium barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6(2): 67-72.
35. Zellin G and Linde A. Effects of different osteopromotive membrane porosities on experimental bone neogenesis in rats. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 695-702.
36. Yamada Y A, Nanba K and Ito K. Effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope in the rabbit calvarium [Research Support, Non-US Government]. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14(4): 455-463.
37. Lundgren AK, Lundgren D, Hammerle CH, et al. Influence of decortication of the donor bone on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit skull bone [Research Support, Non-US Government]. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11(2): 99-106.
38. Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR, et al. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-US Government]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9(1): 13-29.
39. Hämmerle CHF, Olah AJ, Schmid J, et al. The biological effect of natural bone mineral on bone neoformation on the rabbit skull. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8(3): 198-207.
40. Zakaria O, Madi M and Kasugai S. Induced osteogenesis using a new periosteal distractor. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70(3): e225-e234.