Histomorphometrical analysis of new bone obtained by distraction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by periosteal distraction in rabbits

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 235-242

  Sencimen, M ^a   Aydintug, Y S ^a   Ortakoglu, K ^a   Karslioglu, Y ^a   Gunhan, O ^a   Gunaydin, Y ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

distraction osteogenesis; histomorphometric analysis; periosteal distraction

Indexed keywords

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOTOMY; PERIOSTEUM; RABBIT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; MALE; MANDIBLE; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; PERIOSTEUM; RABBITS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846701661     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aaboe M., Pinhold E.M., and Hansen E.H. Healing of experimentally created defects: a review. Br J Oral Surg 33 (1995) 312
2. Al Ruhaimi K.A. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: an experimental investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 220-227
3. Al Ruhaimi K.A. Effect of calcium sulphate on the rate of osteogenesis in distracted bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 228-233
4. Annino Jr. D.J., Goguen L.A., and Karmody C.S. Distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibular symphyseal defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120 (1994) 911-916
5. Aronson J., Harrison B.H., Stewart C.L., and Harp Jr. J.H. The histology of distraction osteogenesis using different external fixators. Clin Orthop 241 (1989) 106-116
6. Basset C.A.L., and Herrmann I. Influence of oxygen concentration and mechanical factors in differentiation of connective tissues in vivo. Nature 190 (1961) 460
7. Block M.S., Chang A., and Crawford C. Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 54 (1996) 309
8. Cope J.B., Samchukov M.L., and Cherkashin A.M. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a historic perspective and future directions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 (1999) 448-460
9. Cope J.B., and Samchukov M.L. Mineralization dynamics of regenerate bone during mandibular osteodistraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 234-242
10. Daniel B.L., Waanders N.A., Zhang Y., Moskalik A., Fowlkes J.B., Rubin J.M., Goulet J.A., and Adler R.S. The use of ultrasound mean acoustic attenuation to quantify bone formation during distraction osteogenesis performed by the Ilizarov method. Preliminary results in five dogs. Invest Radiol 29 (1994) 933-939
11. Delloye C., Delefortrie G., Coutelier L., and Vincent A. Bone regenerate formation in cortical bone during distraction lengthening: an experimental study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250 (1990) 34-42
12. Farhadieh R.D., Gianoutsos M.P., Dickinson R., and Walsh W.R. Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical, mineralization, and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 (2000) 889-895
13. Hagiwara T., and Bell W.H. Effect of electrical stimulation on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28 (2000) 12-19
14. Hamdy R.C., Walsh W., Olmedo M., Wallach M., and Ehrlich M.G. Correlation between ultrasound imaging and mechanical and physical properties of lengthened bone: an experimental study in a canine model. J Pediatr Orthop 15 (1995) 206-211
15. Hikiji H., Takato T., Matsumoto S., and Mori Y. Experimental study of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a bone transport technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 (2000) 1270-1276
16. Ilizarov G.A., Barabash A.P., and Imerlishvili I.A. Morphological characteristics of the formation and reconstruction of bone tissue in the replacement of extensive bone defects. Orthop Travmatol 1 (1984) 16-20
17. Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I: The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 238 (1989) 249-281
18. Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II: The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239 (1989) 263-285
19. Isefuku S., Joyner C.J., and Simpson A.H. A murine model of distraction osteogenesis. Bone 27 (2000) 661-665
20. Kaban L.B., Thurmüller P., Troulis M.J., Glowacki J., Wahl D., Linke B., Rahn B., and Perrott D.H. Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32 (2003) 296-304
21. Karp N.S., Mc Carthy J.G., Schreiber J.S., Sissons H.A., and Thorne C.H. Membranous bone lengthening: a serial histological study. Ann Plast Surg 29 (1992) 2-7
22. Kessler P., Wiltfang J., and Neukam F.W. A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28 (2000) 5-11
23. Klotch D.W., Ganey T.M., Slater Haase A., and Sasse J. Assessment of bone formation during osteogenesis: a canine model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112 (1995) 291-302
24. Kostopoulos L., and Karring T. Role of periosteum in the formation of jaw bone: an experiment in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 22 (1995) 247-254
25. Liou E.J.W., Figueroa A.A., and Polley J.W. Rapid orthodontic tooth movement into newly distracted bone after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a canine model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 117 (2000) 391-398
26. Meyer U., Wiesmann H.P., Kruse-Lösler B., Handschel J., Stratmann U., and Joos U. Strain-related bone remodelling in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 103 (1999) 800-807
27. Ozerdem O.R., Kivanc O., Tuncer I., Acarturk S., Gocenler L., and Gumurdulu D. Callotosis in nonvascularized periosteal bone grafts and the role of periosteum: a new contribution to the concept of distraction osteogenesis. Ann Plast Surg 41 (1998) 148
28. Peterson L.J., Ellis E., Hupp J.R., and Tucker M.R. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery (2003), Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri
29. Popowics T.E., Zhu Z., and Herring S.W. Mechanical properties of the periosteum in the pig, sus scrofa. Arch Oral Biol 47 (2002) 733-741
30. Rachmiel A., Srouji S., and Peled M. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 (2001) 510-517
31. Richards M., Kozloff K.M., Goutlet J.A., and Goldstein S.A. Increased distraction rates influence precursor tissue composition without affecting bone regeneration. J Bone Miner Res 15 (2000) 982-989
32. Samchukov M.L., Cope J.B., and Cherkashin A.M. Craniofacial osteogenesis (2001), Mosby Co, St. Louis
33. Schmidt B., Kung L., Jones C., and Casap N. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 (2002) 1170-1175
34. Simmons D.J. Fracture healing (1980), J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA
35. Welch R.D., Birch J.G., Makarov M.R., and Samchukov M.L. Histomorphometry of distraction osteogenesis in a caprine tibial lengthening model. J Bone Miner Res 13 (1998) 1-9
36. Wilson-Mac Donald J., Houghton G.R., Bradley J., and Morscher E. The relationship between periosteal division and compression or distraction of the growth plate. J Bone Joint Surg 72 (1990) 303-308
37. Zimmermann C.E., Thurmüller P., Troulis M.J., Perrot D.H., Rahn B., and Kaban L.B. Histology of the porcine mandibular distraction wound. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34 (2005) 411-419