A comprehensive model of magnetic particle motion during magnetic drug targeting

International Journal of Multiphase Flow

Volumn 59, Issue , 2014, Pages 173-185

  Cherry, Erica M ^a   Eaton, John K ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood; Interparticle force; Magnetic drug targeting; Magnetic particles; Particle dispersion; Shear thinning

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE MODEL; INTERPARTICLE FORCE; MAGNETIC DRUG TARGETING; MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIENT; MAGNETIC PARTICLE; PARTICLE DIFFUSION; PARTICLE DISPERSION; SHEAR-THINNING NATURE;

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); BLOOD; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DISPERSIONS; FLUIDIZED BEDS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NON NEWTONIAN FLOW; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR THINNING; TUBES (COMPONENTS);

MAGNETIC BUBBLES;

EID: 84890143662     PISSN: 03019322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alexiou C., Jurgons R., Schmid R., Hilpert A., Bergemann C., Parak F., Iro H. In vitro and in vivo investigations of targeted chemotherapy with magnetic nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:389-393.
2. Aviles M.O., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. In vitro study of magnetic particle seeding for implant assisted-magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2008, 320:2640-2646.
3. Babincova M., Babinec P., Bergemann C. High-gradient magnetic capture of ferrofluids: implications for drug targeting and tumor embolization. Z. Naturforsch. C 2001, 56:909-911.
4. Banerjee M.K., Datta A., Ganguly R. Magnetic drug targeting in partly occluded vessels using magnetic microspheres. J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. 2010, 1:041005-1-041005-9.
5. Barth, T.J., Jespersen, D., 1989. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. In: AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada.
6. Brooks D.E., Goodwin J.W., Seaman G.V.F. Interactions among erythrocytes under shear. J. Appl. Physiol. 1970, 28(2):172-177.
7. Cao Q., Han X., Li L. Enhancement of the efficiency of magnetic targeting for drug delivery: development and evaluation of magnet system. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011, 323:1919-1924.
8. Carrier G.F. Shock waves in a dusty gas. J. Fluid Mech. 1958, 4(4):376-382.
9. Cherry, E.M., 2013. A Fluid Mechanics Approach to Understanding and Optimizing Magnetic Drug Targeting. PhD Thesis. Stanford University.
10. Cherry, E.M., Eaton, J.K., 2013. Shear thinning effects on blood flow in straight and curved tubes. Phys. Fluids.
11. Cherry E.M., Maxim P.G., Eaton J.K. Particle size, magnetic field, and blood velocity effects on particle retention in magnetic drug targeting. Med. Phys. 2010, 37.
12. Chesnutt J.K.W., Marshall J. Structural analysis of red blood cell aggregates under shear flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38(3):714-728.
13. Chien S. Shear dependence of effective cell volume as a determinant of blood viscosity. Science 1970, 168:977-979.
14. Chien S., Usami S., Taylor H.M., Lundberg J.L., Gregersen M.I. Effects of hematocrit and plasma proteins on human blood rheology at low shear rates. J. Appl. Physiol. 1966, 21:81-87.
15. Cregg P.J., Murphy K., Mardinoglu A., Prina-Mello A. Many particle magnetic dipole-dipole and hydrodynamic interactions in magnetizable stent assisted magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2010, 322:2087-2094.
16. Damiano, E.R., 1998. Blood flow in microvessels lined with a poroelastic wall layer. In: Poromechanics, Balkema, pp. 403-408.
17. David A.E., Cole A.J., Chertok B., Park Y.S., Yang V.C. A combined theoretical and in vitro modeling approach for predicting the magnetic capture and retention of magnetic nanoparticles in vivo. J. Control. Release 2011, 152:67-75.
18. El-Khatib F.H., Damiano E.R. Linear and nonlinear analysis of pulsatile blood flow in a cylindrical tube. Biorheology 2003, 40:503-522.
19. Fang J., Owens R.G. Numerical simulations of pulsatile blood flow using a new constitutive model. Biorheology 2006, 43(5):637-660.
20. Freund J.B., Shapiro B. Transport of particles by magnetic forces and cellular blood flow in a model microvessel. Phys. Fluids 2012, 24:051904-1-051904-12.
21. Gitter K., Odenbach S. Quantitative targeting maps based on experimental investigations for a branched tube model in magnetic drug targeting. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011, 323:3038-3042.
22. Grief A.D., Richardson G. Mathematical modeling of magnetically targeted drug delivery. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293:455-463.
23. Gudmundsson A., Oden A., Bjelle A. On whole blood viscosity measurements in healthy individuals and in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Biorheology 1994, 31(4):407-416.
24. Haverkort J.W., Kenjeres S., Kleijn C.R. Computational simulations of magnetic particle capture in arterial flows. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37(12):2436-2448.
25. Kayal S., Bandyopadhyay D., Mandalb T.K., Ramanujan R.V. The flow of magnetic nanoparticles in magnetic drug targeting. RSC Adv. 2011, 1:238-246.
26. Kenjeres S., Righolt B.W. Simulations of magnetic capturing of drug carriers in the brain vascular system. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2012, 35:68-75.
27. Kenjeres, S., Stuart, D.C.C., 2009. Computational simulations of magnetic particle capture in simplified and realistic arterial flows: towards optimized magnetic drug targeting. In: Schlegel, W.C., Doessel, O. (Eds.), IFMBE Proceedings 25/IV, pp. 1006-1009.
28. Lubbe A.S., Bergemann C., Riess H., Schriever F., Reichardt P., Possinger K., Matthias M., Doerken B., Herrmann F., Gurtler R., Hohenberger P., Haas N., Sohr R., Sander B., Lemke A.J., Ohlendorf D., Huhnt W., Huhn D. Clinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: a phase I study with 4-epidoxorubicin in 14 patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Res. 1996, 56:4686-4693.
29. Mathieu J.B., Martel S. Magnetic microparticle steering within the constraints of an MRI system: proof of concept of a novel targeting approach. Biomed. Microdevices 2007, 9(6):801-808.
30. Mathieu J.B., Martel S. Aggregation of magnetic microparticles in the context of targeted therapies actuated by a magnetic resonance imaging system. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106:044904-1-044904-8.
31. McGinty S., McKee S., McDermott R. Analytic solutions of Newtonian and non-Newtonian pipe flows subject to a general time-dependent pressure gradient. J. Non-Newton. Mech. 2009, 162:54-77.
32. Medvedev A.E., Fomin V.M. Two-phase blood flow model in large and small vessels. Dokl. Phys. 2011, 56(12):610-613.
33. Moyers-Gonzalez M.A., Owens R.G., Fang J. On the high frequency oscillatory tube flow of healthy human blood. J. Non-Newton. Mech. 2009, 163:45-86.
34. Nacev A., Komaee A., Sarwar A., Probst R., Kim S.H., Emmert-Buck M., Shapiro B. Towards control of magnetic fluids in patients. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 2012, 32-74.
35. Nair P.K., Hellums J.D., Olson J.S. Prediction of oxygen transport rates in blood flowing in large capillaries. Microvasc. Res. 1989, 38(3):269-285.
36. Oechtering J., Kirkpatrick P.J., Rudolph A.G., Hans F.J., Sellhaus B., Spiegelberg A., Krings T. Magnetic microparticles for endovascular aneurysm treatment: in vitro and in vivo experimental results. Neurosurgery 2011, 68(5):1388-1397.
37. Polyak B., Friedman G. Magnetic targeting for site-specific drug delivery: applications and clinical potential. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2009, 6:53-70.
38. Riviere C., Martina M.S., Tomita Y., Wilhelm C., Dinh A., Menager C., Pinard E., Lesieur S., Seylaz F.G.J. Magnetic targeting of nanometric magnetic fluid loaded liposomes to specific brain intravascular areas: a dynamic imaging study in mice. Radiology 2007, 244(2):439-448.
39. Ruuge E.K., Rusetski A.N. Magnetic fluids as drug carriers targeted transport of drugs by a magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1993, 122:335-339.
40. Saadatmand M., Ishikawa T., Matsuki N., Abdekhodaie M.J., Imai Y., Ueno H., Yamaguchi T. Fluid particle diffusion through high-hematocrit blood flow within a capillary tube. J. Biomech. 2011, 44:170-175.
41. Senyei A., Czerlinski K.W.G. Magnetic guidance of drug-carrying microspheres. J. Appl. Phys. 1978, 49:3578-3583.
42. Sharan M., Pope A.S. A two-phase model for flow of blood in narrow tubes with increased effective viscosity near the wall. Biorheology 2001, 38(5-6):415-428.
43. Shaw S., Murthy P.V.S.N. Magnetic drug targeting in the permeable blood vessel the effect of blood rheology. J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. 2010, 1:021001-1-021001-11.
44. Sriram K., Tsai A.G., Cabrales P., Meng F., Acharya S.A., Tartakovsky D.M., Intaglietta M. Peg-albumin supraplasma expansion is due to increased vessel wall shear stress induced by blood viscosity shear thinning. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circulat. Physiol. 2012, 302:H2489-H2497.
45. Yeh C., Eckstein E.C. Transient lateral transport of platelet-sized particles in flowing blood suspensions. Biophys. J. 1994, 66:1706-1716.
46. Yue P., Lee S., Afkhami S., Renardy Y. On the motion of superparamagnetic particles in magnetic drug targeting. Acta Mech. 2012, 223:505-527.
47. Yung K.W., Landecker P.B., Villani D.D. An analytic solution for the force between two magnetic dipoles. Magn. Electr. Separat. 1998, 9:39-52.
48. Zydney A.L., Colton C.K. A constitutive equation for the viscosity of stored red cell suspensions: effect of hematocrit, shear rate, and suspending phase. J. Rheol. 1991, 35(8):1639-1680.