Meta-analysis of the success of block following combined spinal-epidural vs epidural analgesia during labour

Anaesthesia

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 64-71

  Heesen, M ^a   Van De Velde, M ^b   Klohr S ^a   Lehberger, J ^a   Rossaint, R ^c   Straube, S ^d  

^a KLINIKUM BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; LIDOCAINE; MORPHINE; SUFENTANIL;

CANNULATION; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; DATA BASE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL CATHETER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABOR; META ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SPINAL EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION;

ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84890118423     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12456     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Van de Velde M,. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 869-70.
2. Simmons SW, Taghizadeh N, Dennis AT, Hughes D, Cyna AM,. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; 10: CD003401.
3. Eappen S, Blinn A, Segal S,. Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 1998; 7: 220-5.
4. Miro M, Guasch E, Gilsanz F,. Comparison of epidural analgesia with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: a retrospective study of 6497 cases. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2008; 17: 15-9.
5. Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD,. Incidence and characteristics of failure in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19.259 deliveries. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2004; 13: 227-33.
6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, for the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal 2009; 339: b2535.
7. Dunn SM, Connelly NR, Steinberg RB, et al. Intrathecal sufentanil versus epidural lidocaine with epinephrine and sufentanil for early labor analgesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1998; 87: 331-5.
8. Price C, Lafreniere L, Brosnan C, Findley I,. Regional analgesia in early active labour: combined spinal epidural vs. epidural. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 951-5.
9. Hepner DL, Gaiser RR, Cheek TG, Gutsche BB,. Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2000; 47: 232-6.
10. Vernis L, Dualé C, Storme B, Mission JP, Rol B, Schoeffler P,. Perispinal analgesia for labour followed by patient-controlled infusion with bupivacaine and sufentanil: combined spinal-epidural vs. epidural analgesia alone. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2004; 21: 186-92.
11. Thomas JA, Pan PH, Harris LC, Owen MD, DAngelo R,. Dural puncture with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique does not improve labor epidural catheter function. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 1046-51.
12. Ngamprasertwong P, Kumwilaisak K, Indrambarya T, Supbornsug K, Ngarmukos S,. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia in labor: effect of intrathecal fentanyl vs. epidural bupivacaine as a bolus. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2007; 90: 1368-74.
13. Cappiello E, ORourke N, Segal S, Tsen LC,. A randomized trial of dural puncture epidural technique compared with the standard epidural technique for labor analgesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2008; 107: 1646-51.
14. Goodman SR, Smiley RM, Negron MA, Freedman PA, Landau R,. A randomized trial of breakthrough pain during combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labour analgesia in parous women. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2009; 108: 246-51.
15. Pascual-Ramirez J, Haya J, Pérez-Lõpez FR, Gil-Trujillo S, Garrido-Esteban RA, Bernal G,. Effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia versus epidural analgesia on labour and delivery duration. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2011; 114: 246-50.
16. Gambling D, Berkowitz J, Farrell TR, Pue A, Shay D,. A randomized controlled comparison of epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in a private practice setting: pain scores during first and second stages of labor and at delivery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2013; 116: 636-43.
17. Choi PT, Galinski SE, Takeuchi L, Lucas S, Tamayo C, Jadad AR,. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2003; 50: 460-9.
18. Norris MC, Grieco WM, Borkowski M, et al. Complications of labor analgesia: epidural versus combined spinal epidural techniques. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1994; 79: 529-37.
19. Norris MC, Fogel ST, Conway-Long C,. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 913-20.
20. Eisenach JC,. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in obstetrics. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 299-302.