|
Volumn 53, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 951-955
|
Regional analgesia in early active labour: Combined spinal epidural vs. epidural
|
Author keywords
Anaesthesia; Anaesthetic techniques; Epidural; Obstetric; Regional; Spinal
|
Indexed keywords
BUPIVACAINE;
FENTANYL;
LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;
NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;
ADULT;
ANALGESIA;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA;
EPIDURAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
EPIDURAL SPACE;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFUSION PUMP;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
INTRATHECAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
LABOR;
MOTOR NERVE BLOCK;
NORMAL HUMAN;
OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA;
PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PRURITUS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA;
RELIABILITY;
SPINAL ANESTHESIA;
SUBARACHNOID SPACE;
ADULT;
ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL;
ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL;
ANALGESICS, OPIOID;
ANESTHETICS, LOCAL;
BUPIVACAINE;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
FENTANYL;
HUMANS;
INJECTIONS, SPINAL;
MOVEMENT;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PREGNANCY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 0031691469
PISSN: 00032409
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00523.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (15)
|