Electric field enhanced membrane separation system: Principles and typical applications

Electric Field Enhanced Membrane Separation System: Principles and Typical Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-204

  De, Sirshendu ^a   Sarkar, Biswajit ^b   Dasgupta, Sunando ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890105487     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (255)

1. F. Lipnizki, Opportunities and challenges of using ultrafiltration for the concentration of diluted coating materials, Desalination 224 (2008) 98-104.
2. M’nif, S. Bouguecha, B. Hamrouni, M. Dhahbi, Coupling of membrane processes for brackish water, Desalination 203 (2007) 331-336.
3. A. Sonune, R. Ghate, Developments in wastewater treatment methods, Desalination 167 (2004) 55-63.
4. G.A. Pervov, E.V. Dudkin, O.A. Sidorenko, V.V. Antipov, S.A. Khakhenov and R.I. Makarov, RO and NF membrane systems for drinking water production and their maintenance techniques, Desalination 132 (2002) 315-321.
5. G.M. Walker, L.R. Weatherley, Biodegradation and biosorption of acid anthaquinone dye, Environ. Pollut. 108 (2000) 219-223.
6. V. Golob, A. Vinder, M. Simonic, Efficiency of coagulation/flocculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents, Dye Pigments 67 (2005) 9397.
7. A. Roessler, D. Crettenand, O. Dossenbach, W. Marte, P. Rys, Direct electrochemical reduction of indigo, Electrochim. Acta 47 (2002) 1989-1995.
8. S. Wang, Z.H. Zhu, A. Coomes, F. Haghsersht, G.Q. Lu, The physical and surface charaterictics of activated carbons and the adsorption of methylene blue from waste water, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 284 (2005) 440-446.
9. S. Chakraborty, B.C. Bag, S. DasGupta, J.K. Basu, S. De, Prediction of permeate flux and permeate concentration in nanofiltration of dye solution, Sep. Puri. Tecnol. 35 (2004) 141-152.
10. K.M. Pastagia, S. Chakraborty, S. DasGupta, J.K. Basu, S. De, Prediction of permeate flux and concentration of two-component dye mixture in batch nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 218 (2003) 195-210.
11. Tang, V. Chen, Nanofiltration of textile wastewater for water reuse, Desalination 143 (2002) 11-20.
12. Koyuncu, D. Topacik, E. Yuksel, Reuse of reactive dye house waste water by nanofiltration: process water quality and economic implication. Sep. Purif. Technol. 36 (2004) 77-86.
13. R. Atra, G. Vatai, E. B. Molnar, A. Balint, Investigation of ultra- and nanofiltration for utilization of whey protein and lactose, J. Food Eng. 67 (2005) 325-332.
14. G. Brans, C.G.P.H. Schroen, R.G.M. van der Sman, R.M. Boom, Membrane fractionation of milk: state of the art and challenges, J. Membr. Sci. 243 (2004) 263-272.
15. D.N. Lee, R.L. Merson, Prefiltration of cottage cheese whey to reduce fouling of ultrafiltration membrane, J. Food Sci. 41 (1976) 403-410.
16. H.C. van der Horst, J.M.K. Timmer, T. Robbertsen, J. Leenders, Use of nanofiltration for concentration and demineralization in the dairy industry: Model for mass transport, J. Membr. Sci. 104 (1995) 205-218.
17. N.S. Krishna Kumar, M.K. Yea, M. Cheryan, Ultrafiltration of soy protein concentrate: performance and modelling of spiral and tubular polymeric modules, J. Membr. Sci. 244 (2004) 235-242.
18. N.S. Krishna Kumar, M.K. Yea, M. Cheryan, Soy protein concentrates by ultrafiltration, J. Food Sci. 68 (2003) 2278-2283.
19. Girard, L. R. Fukumoto, Membrane processing of fruit juices and beverages: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 40(2) (2000) 91-157.
20. Pepper, A.C.J. Orchard, & A.J. Merry, Concentration of tomato juice &other fruit juice by reverse osmosis. Desalination 57 (1985) 157-166.
21. S. Todisco, P. Tallarico and E. Drioli, Modelling and analysis of the effects of ultrafiltration on the quality of freshly squeezed orange juice, Italian Food and Beverage Technology 12 (1998) 3-8.
22. M.L. Wu, R.R. Zall and W.C. Tzeng, Microfiltration and ultrafiltration comparison of apple juices clarification, J. Food Sci. 55 (1990) 1162-1163.
23. A. Cassano, C. Conidi, R. Timpone, M. D’Avella, E. Drioli, A membrane-based process for the clarification and the concentration of the cactus pear juice, J. Food Eng. 80 (2007) 914-921.
24. R. Ghosh, Z.F. Cui, Fractionation of BSA and lysozyme using ultrafiltration: Effect of pH and membrane pretreatment, J. Membr. Sci. 139 (1998) 17-28.
25. R. Ghosh, Z.F. Cui, Purification of lysozyme using ultrafiltration, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68(2) (2000) 191-203.
26. K. Narasaiah, G.P. Aggarwal, Transmission analysis in ultrafiltration of ternary protein mixture through a hydrophilic membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 287 (2007) 9-18.
27. S. Sakesna, A.L. Zydney, Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin and immunoglobulin (IgG) by selective filtration, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43 (1994) 960-968.
28. A. Maartens, E.P. Jacobs, P. Swart, UF of pulp and paper effluent: membrane fouling-prevention and cleaning, J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 8192.
29. G. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Ni, H. Shi, Y. Qian, Treatability of kraft spent liquor by microfiltration and ultrafiltration, Desalination 160 (2004) 131-141.
30. A.S. Jonsson, R. Wimmerstedt, The application of membrane technology in the pulp and paper industries, Desalination 53 (1985) 181-196.
31. G. Tragardh, V. Gekas, Membrane technology in the sugar industry, Desalination 69 (1988) 9-17.
32. M. Hamachi, B.B. Gupta, R.B. Aim, Ultra filtration: a means for decolorization of cane sugar solution, Sep. Purif. Technol. 30 (2003) 229-239.
33. S. K. Karode, T. Courtois, B.B. Gupta, Ultrafiltration of raw Indian sugar solution using polymeric and mineral membrane, Sep. Sci. Technol. 35(15) (2000) 2473-2483.
34. S.S. Madaeni, S. Zereshki, Reverse osmosis alternative: Energy implication for sugar industry, Chemical Engineering and processing 47 (2008) 1075-1080.
35. A. Cassano, R. Molinari, M. Romano and E. Drioli, Treatment of aqueous effluents of the leather industry by membrane processes A review. J. Membr. Sci. 181 (2001) 111-126.
36. C. Das, S. DasGupta and S. De, Treatment of soaking effluent from tannery using membrane separation processes, Desalination 216 (2007) 160-173.
37. A. Cassano, A. Criscuoli, E. Drioli and R. Molinari, Clean operations in the tanning industry: aqueous degreasing coupled to ultrafiltration: experimental and theoretical analysis. Clean Prod. Processes 1 (4) (1999) 257-263.
38. C. Das, S. De and S. DasGupta, Treatment of liming effluent from tannery using membrane separation processes. Sep. Sci. Technol., 42 (2007) 517-539.
39. M.T. Ahmed, S. Taha, T. Chaabane, D. Akretche, R. Maachi and G. Dorange, Nanofiltration process applied to the tannery solutions. Desalination 200 (2006) 419-420.
40. W.F. Blatt, A. Dravid, A.S. Michaels, L. Nelson, Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: causes, consequences and control techniques, in: J.E. Flinn (Ed.), Membrane Science and Technology, Plenum Press, New York, 1970.
41. S. De, S. Bhattacharjee, A. Sharma, P.K. Bhattacharya, Generalized integral and similarity solution of the concentration profiles for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 130 (1997) 99-121.
42. S. De, P.K. Bhattacharya, Modelling of ultrafiltration process for a two component aqueous solution of low and high (gel forming) molecular weight solutes, J. Membr. Sci. 136 (1997) 57-69.
43. S.K. Karode, A method for prediction of the gel layer concentration in macromolecule ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 171 (2000) 131-139.
44. W.N. Gill, D.E. Wiley, C.J.D. Fell, A.G. Fane, Effects of viscosity on concentration polarization in ultrafiltration, AIChE J. 34 (1988) 1563-1567
45. R. Field, P. Aimar, Ideal limiting fluxes in ultrafiltration: comparison of various theoretical relationships, J. Membr. Sci. 80 (1993) 107-115.
46. P. Aimar, V. Sanches, A novel approach to transfer limiting phenomena during ultrafiltration of macromolecules, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 25 (1986) 789-798.
47. K. Kimura, Y. Hane, Y. Watanabe, G. Amy and N. Ohkuma, Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water, Water Research 38 (14-15) (2004) 3431-3441.
48. M.R. Wiesner, S. Chellam, The promise of membrane technologies, Environ. Sci. Technol. A 33 (17) (1999) 360-366.
49. M. Nystrom, P. Jarvinen, Nodification of ultrafiltration membrane with UV irradiation and hydrophilicity agent, J. Membr. Sci. 60 (1991) 275-296.
50. A. Dimov and M.A. Islam, Hydrophilization of polyethylene membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 50 (1990) 97-100.
51. D. Mukheijee, A. Kulkarni, W. N. Gill, Chemical treatment for improved performance of reverse osmosis membranes, Desalination 104 (1996) 239-249.
52. J. S. Louie, I. Pinnau, I. Ciobanu, K. P. Ishida, A. Ng, M. Reinhard, Effects of polyether-polyamide block copolymer coating on performance and fouling of reverse osmosis membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 280 (2006) 762-770.
53. P.W. Kramer, Y.S. Yeh, H. Yasuda, J. Membr. Sci. 46 (1989) 1.
54. Michelle L.Steen, Lynley Hymas, Elizabeth D. Havey, Nathan E. Capps, David G. Castner, Ellen R. Fisher, J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 97.
55. Y.J. Wang, C.H. Chen, M.L. Yeh, G.H. Hsiue, B.C. Yu, J. Membr. Sci. 53 (1990) 275.
56. M. Ulbricht, G. Belfort, Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by low temperature plasma II. Graft polymerization onto polyacrylonitrile and polysulfone, J. Membr. Sci. 111 (1996) 193-215.
57. T.D. Tran, S. Mori, M. Suzuki, Plasma modification of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane, Thin Solid Films 515 (2007) 4148-4152.
58. S. J. Lue, S.Y. Hsiawa, T.C. Wei, Surface modification of perfluorosulfonic acid membranes with perfluoroheptane (C7F16)/argon plasma, J. Membr. Sci. 305 (2007) 226-237.
59. N.J. Hallab, K.J. Bundy, K. O’Connor, R.L. Moses, J.J. Jacobs, Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion, Tissue Engineering, 7 (2001) 5571.
60. E.M.V. Hoek, S. Bhattacharjee, M. Elimelech, Effect of membrane surface on colloid-membrane DLVO interactions, Langmuir 19 (2003) 4836-4847.
61. S. Aerts, A. Vanhulsel, A. Buekenhoudt, H. Weyten, S. Kuypers, H. Chen, M. Bryjak, L. E.M. Gevers, I.F.J. Vankelecom, P.A. Jacobs, Plasma-treated PDMS-membranes in solvent resistant nanofiltration: Characterization and study of transport mechanism, J. Membr. Sci. 275 (2006) 212-219.
62. J. Lai, B. Sunderland, J. Xue, S. Yan, W. Zhao, M. Folkard, B.D. Michael, Y. Wang, Study on hydrophilicity of polymer surfaces improved by plasma treatment, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (2006) 3375-3379.
63. D.S. Wavhal, E.R. Fisher, Modification of porous poly(ether sulfone) Membranes by Low-Temperature CO2 - Plasma Treatment, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polymer Physics, 40 (2002) 2473-2488.
64. L.J. Gerenser, J.M. Grace, G. Apai, P.M. Thompson, Surface chemistry of nitrogen plasma-treated poly (ethylene-2,6-naphthalate): XPS, HREELS and static SIMS analysis, Surf. Int. anal. 29 (2000) 12-22.
65. D.S. Wavhal, E.R. Fisher, Hydrophilic modification of poly ether-sulfone membranes by low temperature plasma -induced graft polmerization, J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 255-269.
66. K. Good, I. Escobar, X. Xu, M. Coleman, M. Ponting, Modification of commercial water treatment membranes by ion beam irradiation, Desalination 146 (2002) 259-264.
67. R. Chennamsetty, I. Escobar, X. Xu, Characterization of commercial water treatment membranes modified via ion beam irradiation, Desalination 188 (2006) 203-212.
68. M. Taniguchi, J.E. Kilduff, G. Belfort, Low fouling synthetic membranes by UV-assisted graft polymerization: monomer selection to mitigate fouling by natural organic matter, J. Membr. Sci. 222 (2003) 59-70.
69. M. Ulbricht, G. Belfort, Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by low-temperature plasma. 1. Treatment of polyacrylonitrile, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 56 (1995) 325-343.
70. H. Chen, G. Belfort, Surface modification of poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membranes by low-temperature plasma-induced graft polymerization, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 72 (1999) 1699-1711.
71. D.S. Wavhal, E.R. Fisher, Hydrophilic modification of polyethersulfone membranes by low temperature plasma-induced graft polymerization, J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 255-269.
72. S. Belfer, R. Fainshtain, Y. Purinson, J. Gilron, M. Nystrom, M. Manttari, Modification of NF membrane properties by in situ redox initiated graft polymerization with hydrophilic monomers, J. Membr. Sci. 239 (2004) 5564.
73. R.S. Faibish, Y. Cohen, Fouling and rejection behavior of ceramic and polymer-modified ceramic membranes for ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsions and microemulsions, Colloids Surf. A Phys. Eng. Aspects 191 (2001) 27-40.
74. N. Singh, Z. Chen, N. Tomera, S. R. Wickramasinghe, N. Soice, S. M. Husson, Modification of regenerated cellulose ultrafiltration membranes by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization, J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 225-234.
75. V. Gekas, B. Hallstrom, Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross-flow. Part I. Critical literature review and adaptation of existing Sherwood correlations to membrane operations, J. Membr. Sci. 80 (1987) 153.
76. R. Prabhakar, S. DasGupta, S. De, Simultaneous prediction of flux and retention for osmotic pressure controlled turbulent cross-flow ultrafiltration, Sep. Purif. Technol. 18 (2000) 13.
77. V.S. Minnikanti, S. DasGupta, S. De, Prediction of mass transfer with suction for turbulent flow in cross-flow ultra-filtration, J. Membr. Sci. 4079 (1999) 1.
78. G. Belfort, R.H Davis, A.L. Zedney, The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in cross microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 96 (1994) 1-58.
79. D.G. Thomas, Forced convection mass transfer in hyperfiltration at high fluxes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 12 (1973) 396-405.
80. S. Nijarian, B.J. Bellhouse, Enhanced microfiltration of Bovine Blood Using a Tubular Membrane with Screw-Threaded Insert and Oscillatory flow, J. Membr. Sci. 112 (1996) 249-261.
81. A.R. DaCosta, A.G. Fane, D.E. Wiley, Ultrafiltration of whey protein solution in spacer filled flat channel, J. Membr. Sci. 76 (1993) 245-254.
82. M.R. Mackley, N.E. Sherman, Cake filtration mechanisms in steady and unsteady flows, J. Membr. Sci. 77 (1993) 113-121.
83. A. M. Krsti, W. Hoflinger, A. K. Koris, G.N. Vatai, Energy-saving potential of cross-flow ultrafiltration with inserted static mixer: Application to an oil-in-water emulsion, Sep. Purif Technol.57 (2007) 134-139.
84. G.M. Rios, H. Rakotoarisoa and B.T. de la Fuente, Basic transport mechanisms of ultrafiltration in presence of fluidized particles, J. Membr. Sci., 34 (1987) 331-343.
85. G. Arroyo and C. Fonade, Use of intermittent jets to enhance flux in cross flow filtration, J. Membr. Sci., 80 (1993) 117-129.
86. H.R. Millward, B.J. Bellhouse and G. Walker, Screw thread flow promoters: An experimental study of ultrafiltration and microfiltration performance, J. Membr. Sci., 106 (1995) 269-279.
87. S. Najarian and B.J. Bellhouse, Enhanced microfiltration of bovine blood using a tubular membrane with a screw threaded insert and oscillatory flow, J. Membr. Sci, 112 (1996) 249-261.
88. J. Haddink, D. Kloosterboer and S. Bruin, Evaluation of static mixer as convection homogene promoters in ultrafiltration of dairy liquids, Desalination 35 (1980) 149-167.
89. K.H. Youm, A.G. Fane and D.E. Wiley, Effects of natural convection instability on membrane performance in dead-end and cross flow ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 116 (1996) 229-241.
90. Z.F. Cui, K.I.T. Wright, Gas-Liquid two phase flow ultrafiltration of BSA and Dextran solution, J. Membr. Sci. 90 (1994) 183-189.
91. Z.F. Cui, K.I.T. Wright, Flux enhancement with gas sparging in Downwards Crossflow Ultrafiltration: Performance and Mechanism, J. Membr. Sci. 117 (1996) 109-116.
92. M. Mercier, C. Fonade, C. L. Delorme, How slug flow can enhance the ultrafiltration flux in mineral tubular membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 128 (1997) 103-113.
93. C. Cabassud, S. Laborie, J.M. Laine, How slug flow can improve ultrafiltration flux in organic hollow fibres, J. Membr. Sci. 128 (1997) 93101.
94. R. Ghosh, Q. Li, Z. Cui, Fractionation of BSA and Lysozyme using ultrafiltration: Effect of gas sparging, AIChE J. 44 (1998) 61-67.
95. C.K. Lee, W.G. Chang, Y.H. Ju, Air slugs entrapped cross-flow filtration of bacterial suspensions, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 41 (1993) 525-530.
96. K.H. Kroner, V. Nissinen, Dynamic filtration of microbial suspensions using an annular rotating filter, J. Membr. Sci. 36 (1985) 85-100.
97. J. Y. Park, C. K. Choi, J. J. Kimb, A study on dynamic separation of silica slurry using a rotating membrane filter Experiments and filtrate fluxes, J. Membr. Sci. 97 (1994) 263-273.
98. S. Lee, R. M. Lueptow, Control of scale formation in reverse osmosis by membrane rotation, Desalination 155 (2003) 131-139.
99. K.Y. Chung, R. Bates, G. Belfort, Dean vortices with wall flux in a curved channel membrane system. Effect of vortices on permeation fluxes of suspensions in microporous membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 81 (1993) 139-150.
100. M. G. Brewster, K.Y. Chung, G. Belfort, Dean vortices with wall flux in a curved channel membrane system. A new approach to membrane module design, J. Membr. Sci. 81 (1993) 127-137.
101. J. N. Ghogomu, C. Guigui, J.C. Rouch, M.J. Clifton, P. Aptel, Hollow-fibre membrane module design: comparison of different curved geometries with Dean vortices, J. Membr. Sci. 181 (2001) 71-80.
102. J. Kaur, G.P. Agarwal, Studies on protein transmission in thin channel flow module: the role of dean vortices for improving mass transfer, J. Membr. Sci. 196 (2002) 1-11.
103. C. Guigui, P. Manno, P. Moulin, M.J. Clifton, J.C. Rouch, P. Aptel, J.M. Laine, The use of Dean vortices in coiled hollow-fibre ultrafiltration membranes for water and wastewater treatment, Desalination 118 (1998) 73-79.
104. S. Srinivasan, C. Tien, Reverse osmosis in a curved tubular membrane duct, Desalination 9 (1971) 127-139.
105. P. Moulin, J.C. Rouch, C. Serra, M.J. Clifton, P. Aptel, Mass transfer improvement by secondary flows: Dean vortices in coiled tubular membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 114 (1996) 235-244.
106. Y.Y. Wang, J.A. Howell, R.W. Field, D.X. Wu, Simulation of cross flow filtration for baffle tubular channels and pulsatile flow, J. Membr. Sci. 95 (1994) 243-258.
107. H. Bauser, H. Chmiel, N. Stroh, E. Walitza, Control of concentration polarization and fouling of membranes in medical, food and biochemical applications, J. Membr. Sci.27 (1986) 195-202.
108. T. J. Kennedy, R. L. Merson and B. J. McCoy, Improving permeation flux by pulsed reverse osmosis, Chem. Eng. Sci., 29 (1974) 1927-1931.
109. H. Bauser, H. Chmiel, N. Stroh and E. Walitza, Interfacial effects with microfiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 11 (1982) 321-332.
110. S. M. Finnigan and J. A. Howell, The effect of pulsed flow on ultrafiltration fluxes in a baffled tubular membrane system, Desalination 79 (1990) 181-202.
111. S. M. Finnigan and J. A. Howell, The effect of pulsatile flow on ultrafiltration fluxs in a baffled tubular membrane system, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 67 (1989) 278-282.
112. K.D. Miller, S. Weitzel and V.G.J. Rodgers, Reduction of membrane fouling in the presence of high polarization resistance, J. Membr. Sci., 76 (1993) 77-83.
113. S. Najarian and B.J. Bellhouse, Effect of liquid pulsation on protein fractionation using ultrafiltration processes, J. Membr. Sci., 114 (1996) 245-253.
114. V.G.J. Rodgers, R.E. Sparks, Reduction of membrane fouling in the ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures, AIChE J., 37 (1991) 1517-1528.
115. S. Illias and R. Govind, Potential applications of pulsed flow for increasing concentration polarization in ultrafiltration, Sep. Sci. Technol., 25 (1990) 1307-1324.
116. R.A. Curtis, L. Lue, A molecular approach to bioseparations: Proteinprotein and protein-salt interactions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61 (2006) 907-923.
117. R. Van Eijndhoven, S. Saksena, A.L. Zydney, Protein fractionation using electrostatic interaction in membrane filtration, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 48 (1995) 406-414.
118. A. Lucas, M.R. Baudry, F. Michel, B. Chaufer, Role of physico-chemical environment on ultrafiltration of lysozyme with inorganic membrane, Colloid Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspect 136 (1998) 109-122.
119. D.S. Nakao, H. Osada, H. kurata, T. Tsuru, Separation of proteins by charged ultrafiltration membrane, Desalination 70 (1988) 191-205.
120. M. Balakrishnan, G.P Agarwal, Protein fractionation in a vortex filter. II Separation of simulated mixture, J. Membr Sci. 112 (1996) 75-84.
121. D.M. Malone, J.L. Anderson, Hindered diffusion of particles through small pores, Chem. Eng. Sci. 33 (1978) 1429-1440.
122. B.D. Mitchell, W.M. Deen, Theoretical effects of macromolecular concentration and charge on membrane rejection coefficient, J. Membr Sci.19 (1984) 75-100.
123. E.D. Glandt, Density distribution of hard spherical molecules inside small pore of various shapes, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 77 (1980) 512-524.
124. W.M. Deen, Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores, AIChE J. 33 (1987) 1409-1425.
125. N. Lee, R.L Merson, Examination of cottage cheese whey by scanning electon microscopy: Relationship to membrane fouling during ultrafiltration, J. Dairy Sci. 58(10) (1975) 1423-1432.
126. E.J.W. Verwey, J.T.G. Overbeek, Theory of stability of lyophobic colloids, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1948.
127. A. Strzelewicz, Z. J. Grzywna, Studies on the air membrane separation in the presence of a magnetic field, J. Membr. Sci. 294 (2007) 60-67.
128. S. Murad, The role of magnetic fields on the membrane-based separation of aqueous electrolyte solutions, Chemical Physics Letters 417 (2006) 465-470.
129. J.D. Henry, L.F. Lawler, C.H. A. Kuo, A solid-liquid separation process based on cross flow and electrofiltration, AIChE J. 23 (1977) 851-859.
130. S.P. Moulik, Physical aspects of electro-ultrafiltration, Current Res. 5 (1971) 771-776.
131. R.J. Wakeman, E.S. Tarleton, Experiments using electricity to prevent fouling membrane filtration, Filtration and Separation May/June (1986) 174-176.
132. J.M. Radovich, B. Behnam, Concentration ultrafiltration and diafiltration of albumin with an electric field, Sep. Sci. Technol, 18(3) (1983) 223-228.
133. H. Yukawa, K. Shimura, A. Suda and A. Maniwa, Characteristics of cross flow electro-ultrafiltration for colloidal solution of protein, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 16(3) (1983) 246-249.
134. H. Yukawa, K. Shrmura, A. Suda, A. Mamwa, Crossflow electroultrafiltration for colloidal solution of protein, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 16(4) (1983) 305-311.
135. S. Oussedik, D. Belhocine, H. Grib, H. Lounici, D.L. Piron, N. Mameri, Enhanced ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin with pulsed electric field and fluidized activated alumina, Desalination 127 (2000) 59-68.
136. T. Weigert, J. Altmann, S. Ripperger, Cross-flow electro-filtration in pilot scale, J. Membr. Sci.159 (1999) 253-262.
137. J.M. Radovich, B. Behnam, C. Mullon, Steady state modeling of electroultrafiltration at constant concentration, Sep. Sci. Technol. 20 (4) (1985) 315-329.
138. S.N. Jagannadh, H.S. Muralidhara, Electrokinetic method to control membrane fouling, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35 (1996) 1133-1140.
139. N. Mameri, S.M. Oussedik, A. Khelifa, D. Belhocine, H. Gharib, H. Lounici, Electric field applied in the ultrafiltration process, Desalination 138(2001)291.
140. H.M. Huotari, I.H. Huisman, G. Tragardh, Electrically enhanced crossflow filtration of oily wastewater using membrane as a cathode, J. Membr. Sci. 156 (1999) 49-60.
141. R. Hofmann, C. Posten, Improvement of dead-end filtration of biopolymer with pressure electrofiltration, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 3847-3858.
142. W.R. Bowen, H.A.M. Subuni, Electrically enhanced membrane filtration at low cross-flow velocities, Ind. Eng. Res. 30 (1991) 1573-1579.
143. W.R. Bowen, H.A.M. Subuni, Pulsed electrokinetic cleaning of cellulose nitrate microfiltration membrane, Ind. Eng. Res. 31 (1992) 515-523.
144. W.R. Bowen, R.S. Kingdon, H.A.M. Subuni, Electrically enhanced separation processes: the basis of in situ intermittent electrolytic membrane cleaning (IIEMC) and in situ electrolytic membrane restoration (IEMR), J. Membr. Sci. 40 (1989) 219-229.
145. R.J. Wakeman, E.S. Tarleton, Membrane fouling prevention in crossflow microfiltration by the use of electric fields, Chem. Eng. Sci. 42 (1987) 829-842.
146. C.W. Robinson, M.H. Siegel, A. Condemine, C. Fee, T.Z. Fahidy, B.R. Glick, Pulsed-electric-field cross flow ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin, J. Membr. Sci. 80 (1993) 209-220.
147. S. Alvarez, F.A. Riera, R. Alvarez, J. Coca, F.P. cuperus, S. Th Bouwer, G. Boswinkel, R.W. van Gemert, J.W. Veldsink, L. Giorno, L. Donato, S. Todisco, E. Drioli, J. Olsson, G. tragardh, S.N. Gaeta, L. Panyor, a new integrated membrane process for producing clarified apple juice and apple juice aroma concentrate, J. Food Eng. 46 (2000) 109-125.
148. Cassano, B. Jiao, E. Drioli, Production of concentrated kiwifruit juice by integrated membrane process, Food Research International 37 (2004) 139-148
149. E. Maccarona, S. Campisi, M.C.C.B. Fallico, C.N. Asmundo, Thermal treatments effect on the red orange juice constituents, Industria Bevande, 25(1996)335-341.
150. Girard, L. R. Fukumoto, Membrane processing of fruit juices and beverages: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 40(2) (2000) 91-157.
151. R. Thakur, R.K. Singh, A.K. Handa, Chemistry and Uses of Pectin- A Review, Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 37 (1) (1997) 4773.
152. M.Z. Sulaiman, N.M. Sulaiman, M. Shamel, Ultrafiltration studies on solutions of pectin, glucose and their mixture in a pilot scale cross flow membrane unit, Chem. Eng. J. 84 (2001) 557-563.
153. S. Lee, M. Elimelech, Salt cleaning of organic-fouled reverse osmosis membranes, Water Res. 41 (2007) 1134-1142.
154. P. Rai, G.C. Majumdar, S DasGupta, S. De, Modeling of permeate flux of synthetic fruit juice and mosambi juice (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) in stirred continuous ultrafiltration, LWT 40 (2007) 1765-1773.
155. P. Rai, C. Rai, G.C. Majumdar, S DasGupta, S. De, Resistance in series model for ultrafiltration of mosambi (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) juice in a stirred continuous mode, J. Membr. Sci. 283 (2006) 116-122.
156. W.R. Bowen, H.A.M. Subuni, Electrically enhanced membrane filtration at low cross-flow velocities, Ind. Eng. Res. 30 (1991) 1573-1579.
157. W.R. Bowen, H.A.M. Subuni, Pulsed electrokinetic cleaning of cellulose nitrate microfiltration membrane, Ind. Eng. Res. 31 (1992) 515-523.
158. W.R. Bowen, R.S. Kingdon, H.A.M. Subuni, Electrically enhanced separation processes: the basis of in situ intermittent electrolytic membrane cleaning (IIEMC) and in situ electrolytic membrane restoration (IEMR), J. Membr. Sci. 40 (1989) 219-229.
159. C.W. Robinson, M.H. Siegel, A. Condemine, C. Fee, T.Z. Fahidy, B.R. Glick, Pulsed-electric-field cross flow ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin, J. Membr. Sci. 80 (1993) 209-220.
160. H.R. Rabie, A.S. Majumdar, M.E. Weber, Interrupted electroosmosis dewatering of clay suspensions, Sep. Technol. 4(1) (1994) 38-46.
161. A.K. Vijh, Electrochemical aspects of electroosmotic dewatering of clay suspension, Drying Technol. 13 (1-2) (1995) 215-224.
162. S. De, P.K. Bhattacharya, Modeling of ultrafiltration process for a two-component aqueous solution of low and high (gel forming) molecular weight solutes, J. Membr. Sci. 136 (1999) 57-69.
163. V.S. Minnikanti, S. DasGupta, S. De, Prediction of mass transfer coefficient with suction for turbulent flow in cross flow ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 157 (1999) 227-239.
164. S. De, S. Bhattarcharya, P.K. Bhattarcharya, A. Sharma, Generalized integral & similarly solution of the concentration profile for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 130 (1997) 99-121.
165. J.S. Shen, R.F. Probstein, On the prediction of limiting flux in laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 16 (1977) 459-465.
166. R.F. Probstein, J.S. Shen, W.F. Leung, Ultrafiltration of macromolecular solution at high polarization in laminar channel flow, Desalination 24 (1978) 1-16.
167. M. Cheryan, Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook, Technomic Publishing Company Inc., USA, 1998.
168. F.L. Hart, H.J. Fisher, Modern Food Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 1971.
169. R.J. Hunter, Zeta potential in colloid Science: Principles and Applications, Academic Press, London, 1981.
170. L. Stryer, Biochemistry, Freeman, New York, 1998.
171. M. Pritchard, J.A. Howell, R.W. Field, The ultrafiltration of viscous fluids, J. Membr. Sci. 102 (1995) 223-235.
172. S. Bhattacharjee, A. Sharma, P.K. Bhattacharya, A unified model for flux prediction during batch cell ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 111 (1996) 243-258.
173. S. Pal, A. Ghosh, T.B. Ghosh, S. De, S. DasGupta, Optical quantification of fouling during nanofiltration of dyes, Sep. Purif. Tech. 52 (2006) 372-379.
174. B. Sarkar, S. Pal, T.B. Ghosh, S. De, S. DasGupta, A study of electric field enhanced ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice and optical quantification of gel deposition, J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 112-120.
175. R.B. Bird, W.E. Stewart, E.N. Lightfoot, Transport phenomena, John Wiley, Singapore, 2002.
176. S. De, S. Bhattarcharya, P.K. Bhattarcharya, A. Sharma, Generalized integral &similarly solution of the concentration profile for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 130 (1997) 99-121.
177. S.M. Oussedik, D. Belhocine, H. Grib, H. Lounici, D.L. Piron, N. Mameri, Enhanced ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin with pulsed electric field and fluidized activated alumina, Desalination 127 (2000) 59-68.
178. W. R. Bowen, P.M. Williams, dynamic ultrafiltration model for proteins: A colloidal interaction approach, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 50 (1996) 125-135.
179. R.J. Hunter, Zeta potential in colloid Science: Principles and Applications, Academic Press, London, 1981.
180. nd Ed. Academic press, London, 1991
181. W.R. Bowen, F. Jenner, dynamic ultrafiltration model for charged colloidal dispersion: A Wigner-Seitz cell approach, Chem. Engg. Sci. 50 (1995) 1707-1736.
182. E. Wigner, F. Seitz, On the constitution of metallic sodium, Phys. rev. 43 (1933) 804-810.
183. S.R. Bellara, Z.F. Cui, Maxwell- Stefan approach to modelling the cross flow ultrafiltration of protein solution in tubular membranes, Chem. Eng. Sci. 52 (1998) 2153-2166.
184. S.S. Vasan, R.W. Field, Z. Cui, A Maxwell- Stefan-Gouy-Debye model of the concentration profile of a charged solute in the polarization layer, Desalination 192 (2006) 356-363.
185. A.D. Enevoldsen, E.B. Hansen, G. Jonsson, Electro-ultrafiltraton of industrial enzyme solutions, J. Membr. Sci. 299 (2007) 28-37.
186. A.D. Enevoldsen, E.B. Hansen, G. Jonsson, Electro-ultrafiltraton of amylase enzymes: Process design and economy solutions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62 (2007) 6716-6725.
187. T. Kappler, C. Posten, Fractionation of proteins with two-sided electro-ultrafiltraton, Journal of Biotechnology 128 (2007) 895-907.
188. P.v. Zumbusch, W. Kulcke, G. Brunner, Use of alternating electrical fields as anti- fouling strategy in ultrafiltration of biological suspensions-Introduction of a new experimental procedure for crossflow filtration, J. Membr. Sci. 142 (1998) 75-86.
189. H. Saveyn, P.V. Meeren, R. Hofmann, W. Stahl, Modelling two-sided electrofiltration of quartz suspensions: Importance of electrochemical reactions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005) 6768-6779.
190. G.B. Van der Berg, I.G. Racz, C.A. Smolders, Mass transfer coefficients in cross flow ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 47 (1989) 25-51.
191. V. Gekas, B. Hallstrom, Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow. I. Critical literature review and adaptation of existing Sherwood correlations to membrane operations, J. Membr. Sci. 30 (1987) 153-170.
192. S.S. Vasan, C.D. Bain, R.W. Field, Z.F. Cui, A Maxwell-Stefan-Derjaguin- Grahame model of the concentration profile of a charged solute in the polarisation layer, Desalination 200 (2006) 175-177.
193. R.B. Bird, W.E. Stewart, E.N. Lightfoot, Transport phenomena, John Wiley, Singapore, 2002.
194. S. De, S. Bhattacharjee, A. Sharma, P.K. Bhattacharya, Generalized integral and similarity solution of the concentration profiles for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 130 (1997) 99-121.
195. W.R. Bowen, P.M. Williams, The osmotic pressure of electrostatically stabilized colloidal dispersions, J. Colloid Interface 184 (1996) 241-250.
196. W.R. Bowen, A. Mongruel, P.M. Williams, Prediction of the rate of crossflow membrane ultrafiltration: A colloidal interaction approach, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51 (18) (1996) 4321-4333.
197. F.M. White, Fluid Mechanics, Mc Graw-Hill, Singapore, 1999.
198. V.G.J. Rodger, R.E. Spark, Reduction of membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures, AIChE. J. 37 (1991) 1517-1528.
199. J.H. Sung, M.S. Chun, H.J. Choi, On the behavior of electrokinetic streaming potential during protein filtration with fully and partially retentive nanopores, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264 (2003) 195-202.
200. H. Matsumoto, Y. Koyama, A. Tanioka, Interaction of proteins with weak amphoteric charged membrane surfaces: effect of pH, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264 (2003) 82-88.
201. K.J. Kim, A.G. Fane, M. Nystrom, A. Pihlajamaki, W.R. Bowen, H. Mukhtar, Evaluation of electroosmosis and streaming potential for measurement of electric charges of polymeric membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 116 (1996) 149-159.
202. Y. Soffer, J. Gilron, A. Adin, Streaming potential and SEM-EDX study of UF membranes fouled by colloidal iron, Desalination 146 (2002) 115-121.
203. M.S. Chun, H. Cho, I.K. Song, Electrokinetic behavior of membrane zeta potential during the filtration of colloidal suspensions, Desalination 148 (2002) 363-368.
204. N.D. Lawrence, J.M. Perera, M. Iyer, M.W. Hickey, G.W. Stevens, The use of streaming potential measurements to study the fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes, Sep. Purif Technol. 48 (2006) 106-112.
205. L. Ricq, A. Pierre, J.C. Reggiani, J. Pagetti, A. Foissy, Use of electrophoretic mobility and streaming potential measurements to characterize electrokinetic properties of ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes, Colloid Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 138 (1998) 301-308.
206. P.C. Hiemenz and R. Rajagopalan, Principles of colloid and surface chemistry, Marcel Dekker, NY, 1997.
207. L. Palacio, C.C. Ho, P. Pradanos, A. Hernandez, A.L. Zydney, Fouling with protein mixtures in microfiltration: BSA-lysozyme and BSA- pepsin, J. Membr. Sci. 222 (2003) 41-51.
208. V.L. Vilker, C.K. Colton, K.A. Smith, Concentration polarization in protein ultrafiltration. Part II: Theoretical and experimental study of albumin ultrafiltered in an unstirred cell, AIChE J. 27 (1981) 637-645.
209. R. Van Eijndhoven, S. Saksena, A.L. Zydney, Protein fractionation using electrostatic interaction in membrane filtration, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 48 (1995) 406-414.
210. L. Millesime, J. Dulieu, B. Chaufer, Fractionation of proteins using modified membranes, Bioseparation 6 (1996) 135-145.
211. E. Iritani, Y. Mukai, T. Murase, Upward dead-end ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures, Sep. Sci. Technol. 30 (1995) 369-382.
212. S. Saksena, A.L. Zydney, Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on separation of albumin from immunoglobulin (IgG) by selective filtration, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43 (1994) 960-968.
213. N. Ehsani, S. Parkkinen, M. Nyström, Fractionation of natural and model egg- white protein solutions with modified and unmodified polysulfone UF membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 123 (1997) 105-119.
214. K.C. Ingham, T.F. Busby, Y. Sahlestrom, F. Castino, separation of macromolecules by ultrafiltration: Influence of protein adsorption, proteinprotein interaction, and concentration polarization, in: A.R. Cooper (Ed.), Polymer Science and Technology, vol. 13 (Ultrafiltration Membranes and applications), Plenum Press, New York, 1980.
215. S. Najarian, B.J. Bellhouse, Effect of liquid pulsation on protein fractionation usingultrafiltration processes, J. Membr. Sci. 114 (1996) 245-253.
216. C. Wilharm, V.G.J. Rodgers, Significance of duration and amplitude in transmembrane pressure pulsed ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures, J. Membr. Sci. 121 (1996) 217-228.
217. M.Y. Teng, S.H. Lin, C.Y. Wu, R.S. Juang, Factors affecting selective rejection of proteins within a binary mixture during cross-flow ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 103-110.
218. V.L. Vilker, C.K. Colton, K.A. Smith, The osmotic pressure of concentration protein solutions: effect of concentration and pH in saline solutions of bovine serum albumin, J. Colloid Interface 79 (1981) 548-566.
219. W. Eberstein, Y. Georgalis, W. Saenger, Molecular interaction in crystallizing lysozyme solutions studied by photon correlation spectroscopy, Journal of Crystal Growth 143 (1994) 71-78.
220. M.A. Bos, Z. Shervani, A.C.I. Anusiem, M. Giesbers, W. Norde, J.M. Kleijn, Influence of electric potential of the interface on the adsorption of proteins, Colloid Surf. B 3(1994) 91-100.
221. W.S. Opong, A.L. Zydney, Diffusive and convective protein transport through asymmetric membranes, AIChE. J. 37 (1991) 1497-1510.
222. C.H. Muller, G.P. Agarwal, Th. Melin and Th. Wintgens, Study of ultrafiltration of a single and binary protein solution in a thin spiral channel module, J. Membr. Sci. 227 (2003) 51-69.
223. L. Palacio, C.C. Ho, P. Pradanos, A. Hernandez, A.L. Zydney, Fouling with protein mixtures in microfiltration: BSA-Lysozyme and BSA-pepsin, J. Membr. Sci. 222 (2003) 41-51.
224. V. Karthik, S. DasGupta, S. De, Modeling and simulation of osmotic pressure controlled electro-ultrafiltration in a cross-flow system, J. Membr. Sci. 199 (2002) 29-40.
225. K.R. Hall, Another hard-sphere equation of state, J. Chem. Phys. 57 (1972) 2252-2254.
226. C. Teng, V. Chen, Nanofiltration of textile wastewater for water reuse, Desalination 143 (2002) 11-20.
227. L. Tinghui, T. Matsuura, S. Sourirajan, Membrane materials and average pore size on reverse osmosis separation of dyes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 22 (1983) 77-87.
228. Y. Xu, R. Lebrun, P.J. Gallo, P. Blond, Treatment of textile dye effluent by nanofiltration, Sep. Sci. Technol. 34 (1999) 2501-2519.
229. J.F. Scamehorn, J.H. Harwell (Eds.), Surfactant Based Separation processes, Surfactant Science Series, Marcel-Dekker Inc., New York, 1989
230. R.O. Dunn Jr., J.F. Scamehorn, S.D. Cristian, Use of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration to remove dissolved organics from aqueous stream, Sep. Sci. Technol. 20 (1985) 257-284.
231. M. Syamal, S. De, P.K. Bhattacharya, Phenol solubilization by cetylpyridinium chloride micelles in micellar enhanced ultrafiltration, J Membr. Sci. 137 (1995) 99-107.
232. M.K. Purkait, S. DasGupta, S. De, Removal of dye from waste water using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration and recovery of surfactant, Sep. Sci. Technol. 37 (2004) 81-92.
233. S.R. Jadav, N. Verma, A. Sharma, P.K. Bhattacharya, Flux and retention analysis during micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for the removal of phenol and aniline, Sep. Sci. Technol. 24 (2001) 541-557.
234. A.L. Ahmad, S.W. Puasa, M.M.D. Zulkali, Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of reactive dyes from an aqueous solution, Desalination 191 (2006) 153-161
235. N. Zaghbani, A. Hafiana, M. Dhabhi, Separation of methylene blue from aqueous solution by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration, Sep. Sci. Technol. 55 (2007) 117-124
236. C. Fesi, L. Gzara, M. Dhabhi, Treatment of textile effluents by membrane technologies, Desalination 185 (2005) 399-409.
237. B. Van der Bruggen, B. Daems, D. Wilms, C. Vandecasteele, Mechanisms of retention and flux decline for the nanofiltration of dye baths from the textile industry, Sep. Sci. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 519-528.
238. M. Bielska, K. Prochaaska, Dyes separation by means of cross-flow ultrafiltration of micellar solutions, Dyes and pigments 74 (2007) 410-415
239. J.F. Rathman, J.F. Scamehorn, Counter binding on mixed micelles, J. Phys. Chem. 88 (1984) 5807-5816
240. W.F. Blatt, A. Dravid, A.S. Michaels, L. Nelson, Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: causes, consequences and control techniques, in: J.E. Flinn (Ed.), Membrane Science and Technology, Plenum Press, New York, 1970.
241. G. Akay, R.J. Wakeman, Electric field intensification of surfactant mediated separation processes, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 74 (1996) 517-525.
242. Roessler, D. Crettenand, O. Dossenbach, W. Marte, P. Rys, Direct electrochemical reduction of indigo, Electrochim. Acta. 47(2002) 1989-1995.
243. V. Golob, A. Vinder, M. Simonic, Efficiency of the coagulation/f locculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents, Dyes pigments 67 (2005) 93-97.
244. G.M. Walker, L.R. Weatherley, Biodegradation and biosorption of anthraquinone dye, Environ. Pollut. 108 (2000) 219-223.
245. Wang, A. Yediler, D. Lienert, Z. Wang, A. Kettrup, Ozonation of an azo dye C.I. Remozol Black5 and toxicological assessment of its oxidation products, Chemosphere 52 (7) (2003) 1225-1232.
246. S. Wang, Z.H. Zhu, A. Coomes, F. Haghseresht, G.Q. Lu, The physical and surface chemical characteristics of activated carbons and the adsorption of methylene blue from waste water, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 284 (2005) 440-446.
247. L. Song, A new model for the calculation of the limiting flux in ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 144 (1998) 173-185.
248. J.S. Shen, R.F. Probstein, On the prediction of limiting flux in laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solution, Ind. Eng. Chem., Fundam. 16(4) (1977) 459-465.
249. J.F. Scamehorn, J.H. Harwell (Eds.), Surfactant Based Separation Processes, Surfactant Science Series, Marcel-Dekker Inc., New York, 1989.
250. S.R. Epton, A new method for the rapid titrimetric analysis of sodium alkyl sulphates and related compounds, Trans. Faraday Soc. 44 (1948) 226-230.
251. J. B. Hayter and J. Penfold, Determination of micelle structure and charge by neutron small-angle scattering, Colloid Polym. Sci 261 (1983) 1022-1030.
252. S. De, P.K. Bhattacharya, Modeling of ultrafiltration process for a two -component aqueous solution of low and high (gel-forming) molecular weight solutes, J. Membr. Sci. 136 (1997) 57-69.
253. Y. Moroi, Mass action model of micelle formation: Its application to sodium dodecyl sulphate solution, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 122 (1988) 308-314.
254. S.D. Christian, J.F. Scamehorn, Use of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration to remove dissolved organics from aqueous streams, in: J.F. Scamehorn (Ed.), Surfactant Based Separation Process, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989.
255. P. Bacchin, A possible link between critical and limiting flux for colloidal systems: concentration of critical deposit formation along a membrane, J. Membr. Sci. 228 (2004) 237-241.