The representational dynamics of remembered projectile locations

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1690-1699

  De Sá Teixeira, Nuno Alexandre ^a,b   Hecht, Heiko ^a   Oliveira, Armando Mónica ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Motion perception,; Representational gravity,; Representational momentum,; Representational trajectory; Time course,

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GRAVITY; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECALL; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; GRAVITATION; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890089736     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0031777     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barnes, G. R., & Assleman, P. T. (1991). The mechanism of prediction in human smooth pursuit eye movements. The Journal of Physiology, 439, 439-461.
2. Baurès, R., Benguigui, N., Amorim, M.-A., & Siegler, I. A. (2007). Intercepting free falling objects: Better use Occam's razor than internalize Newton's law. Vision Research, 47, 2982-2991. doi:10.1016/j .visres.2007.07.024
3. Becker, W., & Fuchs, A. F. (1985). Prediction in the oculomotor system: Smooth pursuit during transient disappearance of a visual target. Experimental Brain Research, 57, 562-575. doi:10.1007/BF00237843
4. Boman, D. K., & Hotson, J. R. (1988). Stimulus conditions that enhance anticipatory slow eye movements. Vision Research, 28, 1157-1165.
5. De Sá Teixeira, N. A., & Oliveira, A. M. (2011). Disambiguating the effects of target travelled distance and target vanishing point upon representational momentum. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 650- 658. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.557357
6. Eckmiller, R., & Mackeben, M. (1978). Pursuit eye movements and their neural control in the monkey. Pflügers Archiv, 377, 15-23. doi:10.1007/ BF00584369
7. Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.427
8. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126-132. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.126
9. Freyd, J. J., & Johnson, J.Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 259-268. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.259
10. Gentner, D. (2002). Mental models, psychology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Bates (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9683-9687). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
11. Hecht, H. (2001). Regularities of the physical world and the absence of their. internalization Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 608-617. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000036
12. Hecht, H., & Bertamini, M. (2000). Understanding projectile acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 730-746. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.730
13. Hecht, H., & Proffitt, D. R. (1991). Apparent extended body motions in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1090-1103. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.4.1090
14. Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition, 18, 299-309. doi:10.3758/BF03213883
15. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Cognitive representation of motion: Evidence for friction and gravity analogues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 241-254. doi:10.1037/0278-7393 .21.1.241
16. Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851. doi:10.3758/BF03196775
17. Hubbard, T. L. (2006). Computational theory and cognition in representational momentum and related types of displacement: A reply to Kerzel. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 174 -177. doi:10.3758/ BF03193830
18. Hubbard, T. L., & Bharucha, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 211- 221. doi:10.3758/BF03206290
19. Hubbard, T. L., Blessum, J. A., & Ruppel, S. E. (2001). Representational momentum and Michote's (1946/1963) "launching effect" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 294-301. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.294
20. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2002). A possible role of naïve impetus in Michotte's "launching effect": Evidence from representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 153-176. doi:10.1080/ 13506280143000377
21. Jammer, M. (1957). Concepts of force. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Kerzel, D. (2000). Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research, 40, 3703-3715. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00226-1
23. Kerzel, D. (2002). Memory for the position of stationary targets: Disentangling foveal bias and memory averaging. Vision Research, 42, 159- 167. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00274-7
24. Kerzel, D. (2003). Centripetal force draws the eyes, not memory of the target, toward the center. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 458-466. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29 .3.458
25. Kerzel, D. (2006). Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on "representational momentum." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 166-173. doi:10.3758/BF03193829
26. Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2003). Neuronal processing delays are compensated in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Current Biology, 13, 1975-1978. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.054
27. Kowler, E. (1989). Cognitive expectations, not habits, control anticipatory smooth oculomotor pursuit. Vision Research, 29, 1049-1057.
28. Kowler, E., Martins, A. J., & Pavel, M. (1984). The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control-IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions. Vision Research, 24, 197-210.
29. Kowler, E., & Steinman, R. M. (1979). The effects of expectations on slow oculomotor control-I: Periodic target steps. Vision Research, 19, 619- 632.
30. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439-453. doi:10.3758/ BF03196179
31. Lacquaniti, F., & Maioli, C. (1989). The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 134-148.
32. Leung, H.-C., & Kettner, R. E. (1997). Predictive smooth pursuit of complex two-dimensional trajectories demonstrated by perturbation responses in monkeys. Vision Research, 37, 1347-1354. doi:10.1016/ S0042-6989(96)00287-8
33. McBeath, M. K., & Shepard, R. N. (1989). Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 333-337. doi:10.3758/BF03204986
34. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 24, 122- 130. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0483-122
35. McIntyre, J., Zago, M., Berthoz, A., & Lacquaniti, F. (2001). Does the brain model Newton's laws? Nature Neuroscience, 4, 693-694. doi: 10.1038/89477
36. Mitrani, L., & Dimitrov, G. (1978). Pursuit eye movements of a disappearing moving target. Vision Research, 18, 537-539. doi:10.1016/ 0042-6989(78)90199-2
37. Müsseler, J., van der Heijden, A. H. C., Mahmud, S. H., Deubel, H., & Ertsey, S. (1999). Relative mislocalization of briefly presented stimuli in the retinal periphery. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1646-1661. doi:10.3758/BF03213124
38. Pola, J., & Wyatt, H. J. (1997). Offset dynamics of human smooth pursuit eye movements: Effects of target presence and subject attention. Vision Research, 37, 2579-2595. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00058-8
39. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.4.417
40. Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 2-28. doi:10.3758/ BF03200759
41. Shepard, R. N., & Chipman, S. (1970). Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1-17. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(70)90002-2
42. Travis, R. C., & Dodge, R. (1930). Ocular pursuit of objects which temporarily disappear. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 98- 112. doi:10.1037/h0074637
43. Whittaker, S. G., & Eaholtz, G. (1982). Learning patterns of eye motion for foveal pursuit. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 23, 393-397. White, P. A. (2006). The causal asymmetry. Psychological Review, 113, 132-147. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.132
44. White, P. A. (2009). Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. Psychological Review, 116, 580-601. doi:10.1037/a0016337
45. Zago, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2005). Visual perception and interception of falling objects: A review of evidence for an internal model of gravity. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2, 198-208. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S04