Prism adaptation in the healthy brain: The shift in line bisection judgments is long lasting and fluctuates

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 165-170

  Schintu, Selene ^a,b,c   Pisella, Laure ^a,b   Jacobs, Stéphane ^a,b   Salemme, Romeo ^a,b,c   Reilly, Karen T ^a,b   Farnè, Alessandro ^a,b,c  

^a LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Line bisection; Plasticity; Prism adaptation; Pseudoneglect; Spatial cognition

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEGLECT; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PERCEPTION; PRISM ADAPTATION; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

LINE BISECTION; PLASTICITY; PRISM ADAPTATION; PSEUDONEGLECT; SPATIAL COGNITION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890071681     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Berberovic N., Mattingley J.B. Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(4):493-503.
2. Bowers D., Heilman K.M. Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18(4-5):49-498.
3. Brighina F., Bisiach E., Piazza A., Oliveri M., La Bua V., Daniele O., et al. Perceptual and response bias in visuospatial neglect due to frontal and parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects. Neuroreport 2002, 13(18):2571.
4. Bultitude J.H., Rafal R.D., List A. Prism adaptation reverses the local processing bias in patients with right temporo-parietal junction lesions. Brain 2009, 132(6):1669-1677.
5. Bultitude J.H., Woods J.M. Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms reduces the global processing bias of healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(6):1750-1756.
6. Bultitude J.H., Van der Stigchel S., Nijboer T.C.W. Prism adaptation alters spatial remapping in healthy individuals: Evidence from double-step saccades. Cortex 2013, 49(3):759-770.
7. Cavézian C., Valadao D., Hurwitz M., Saoud M., Danckert J. Finding centre: Ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance. Brain Research 2012, 1437:89-103.
8. Choe C.S., Welch R.B. Variables affecting the intermanual transfer and decay of prism adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 102(6):1076-1084.
9. Colent C., Pisella L., Bernieri C., Rode G., Rossetti Y. Cognitive bias induced by visuo-motor adaptation to prisms: A simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals?. Neuroreport 2000, 11(9):1899.
10. Corbetta M., Kincade M.J., Lewis C., Snyder A.Z., Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(11):1603-1610.
11. Farnè A., Rossetti Y., Toniolo S., Làdavas E. Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: Visuo-manual and visuo-verbal measures. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(7):718-729.
12. Fernández-Ruiz J., Díaz R., Aguilar C., Hall-Haro C. Decay of prism aftereffects under passive and active conditions. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 20(1):92-97.
13. Fierro B., Brighina F., Oliveri M., Piazza A., La Bua V., Buffa D., et al. Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects. Neuroreport 2000, 11(7):1519-1521.
14. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Shah N.J., Weiss P.H., Halligan P.W., Grosse-Ruyken M., et al. Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 2000, 54(6):1324-1331.
15. Fortis P., Goedert K.M., Barrett A.M. Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(9):2718-2727.
16. Frassinetti F., Angeli V., Meneghello F., Avanzi S., Làdavas E. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 2002, 125(3):608-623.
17. Giglia G., Mattaliano P., Puma A., Rizzo S., Fierro B., Brighina F. Neglect-like effects induced by tDCS modulation of posterior parietal cortices in healthy subjects. Brain Stimulation 2011, 4(4):294-299.
18. Girardi M., McIntosh R.D., Michel C., Vallar G., Rossetti Y. Sensorimotor effects on central space representation: Prism adaptation influences haptic and visual representations in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(11):1477-1487.
19. Hatada Y., Miall R.C., Rossetti Y. Two waves of a long-lasting aftereffect of prism adaptation measured over 7 days. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 169(3):417-426.
20. Hay J.C., Langdon B., Pick H.L. Spatial parameters of eye-hand adaptation to optical distortion (Eye-hand coordination modifiable parameters under optical distortion conditions, deriving quadratic equation for hand response adaptation). Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 91:11-17.
21. Hein A., Held R. A neural model for labile sensorimotor coordinations. Biological Prototypes and Synthetic Systems 1962, 71-74. Plenum, New York. E.E. Bernard, M.R. Kare (Eds.).
22. Held R., Freedman S.J. Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science 1963, 142(3591):455-462.
23. Held R., Mikaelian H. Motor-sensory feedback versus need in adaptation to rearrangement. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1964, 18:685-688.
24. Helmholtz H. Handbuch der physiologischen optik 1867, vol. 3. L. Voss, Leipzig, (Published in English as Treatise on Physiological Optics, Translated by J. Southal. Optical Society of America).
25. Jackson S.R., Newport R. Prism adaptation produces neglect-like patterns of hand path curvature in healthy adults. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39(8):810-814.
26. Jacquin-Courtois S., Rode G., Pavani F., O'Shea J., Giard M.H., Boisson D., et al. Effect of prism adaptation on left dichotic listening deficit in neglect patients: glasses to hear better?. Brain 2010, 133(3):895-908.
27. Jacquin-Courtois S., Rode G., Pisella L., Boisson D., Rossetti Y. Wheel-chair driving improvement following visuo-manual prism adaptation. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 2008, 44(1):90-96.
28. Jewell G., McCourt M.E. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(1):93-110.
29. Klapp S.T., Nordell S.A., Hoekenga K.C., Patton C.B. Long-lasting aftereffect of brief prism exposure. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1974, 15(2):399-400.
30. Koch G., Bonnì S., Giacobbe V., Bucchi G., Basile B., Lupo F., et al. θ-burst stimulation of the left hemisphere accelerates recovery of hemispatial neglect. Neurology 2012, 78(1):24-30.
31. Koch G., Cercignani M., Bonnì S., Giacobbe V., Bucchi G., Versace V., et al. Asymmetry of parietal interhemispheric connections in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(24):8967-8975.
32. Koch G., Oliveri M., Cheeran B., Ruge D., Lo Gerfo E., Salerno S., et al. Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 2008, 131(12):3147-3155.
33. Lackner J.R., Lobovits D. Adaptation to displaced vision: Evidence for prolonged after-effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1977, 29(1):65-69.
34. Loftus A.M., Vijayakumar N., Nicholls M.E.R. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task. Cortex 2009, 45(4):537-543.
35. Luauté J., Halligan P., Rode G., Jacquin-Courtois S., Boisson D. Prism adaptation first among equals in alleviating left neglect: A review. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2006, 24(4-6):409-418.
36. Luauté J., Michel C., Rode G., Pisella L., Jacquin-Courtois S., Costes N., et al. Functional anatomy of the therapeutic effects of prism adaptation on left neglect. Neurology 2006, 66(12):1859-1867.
37. Luauté J., Jacquin-Courtois S., O'Shea J., Christophe L., Rode G., Boisson D., et al. Left-deviating prism adaptation in left neglect patient: Reflexions on a negative result. Neural Plasticity 2012, 2012:1-10.
38. Magnani B., Pavani F., Frassinetti F. Changing auditory time with prismatic goggles. Cognition 2012, 125(2):233-243.
39. Maravita A., McNeil J., Malhotra P., Greenwood R., Husain M., Driver J. Prism adaptation can improve contralesional tactile perception in neglect. Neurology 2003, 60(11):1829-1831.
40. McIntosh R.D., Rossetti Y., Milner A.D. Prism adaptation improves chronic visual and haptic neglect: A single case study. Cortex 2002, 38(3):309-320.
41. Michel C., Pisella L., Prablanc C., Rode G., Rossetti Y. Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19(2):341-350.
42. Michel C., Pisella L., Halligan P.W., Luauté J., Rode G., Boisson D., et al. Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: Implications for theory. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(1):25-39.
43. Milner A.D., McIntosh R.D. The neurological basis of visual neglect. Current Opinion in Neurology 2005, 18(6):748-753.
44. Newport R., Schenk T. Prisms and neglect: What have we learned?. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(6):1080-1091.
45. Nijboer T.C.W., Nys G.M.S., Van der Smagt M.J., Van der Stigchel S., Dijkerman H.C. Repetitive long-term prism adaptation permanently improves the detection of contralesional visual stimuli in a patient with chronic neglect. Cortex 2011, 47(6):734-740.
46. Nijboer T., Vree A., Dijkerman C., Van der Stigchel S. Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: Evidence from antisaccades. Neuroreport 2010, 21(5):386-389.
47. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
48. Oliveri M. Brain stimulation procedures for treatment of contralesional spatial neglect. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2011, 29(6):421-425.
49. Oliveri M., Bisiach E., Brighina F., Piazza A., La Bua V., Buffa D., et al. rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect. Neurology 2001, 57(7):1338-1340.
50. Pisella L., Rode G., Farnè A., Boisson D., Rossetti Y. Dissociated long lasting improvements of straight-ahead pointing and line bisection tasks in two hemineglect patients. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(3):327-334.
51. Pisella L., Rode G., Farnè A., Tilikete C., Rossetti Y. Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology 2006, 19(6):534-542.
52. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: Review and analysis. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(1):1-20.
53. Rode G., Rossetti Y., Boisson D. Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39(11):1250-1254.
54. Romei V., Driver J., Schyns P.G., Thut G. Rhythmic TMS over parietal cortex links distinct brain frequencies to global versus local visual processing. Current Biology 2011, 21(4):334-337.
55. Rossetti Y., Rode G., Pisella L., Farné A., Li L., Boisson D., et al. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 1998, 395(6698):166-169.
56. Saj A., Cojan Y., Vocat R., Luauté J., Vuilleumier P. Prism adaptation enhances activity of intact fronto-parietal areas in both hemispheres in neglect patients. Cortex 2013, 49(1):107-119.
57. Serino A., Angeli V., Frassinetti F., Làdavas E. Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(7):1068-1078.
58. Serino A., Bonifazi S., Pierfederici L., Làdavas E. Neglect treatment by prism adaptation: What recovers and for how long. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2007, 17(6):657-687.
59. Sparing R., Thimm M., Hesse M.D., Küst J., Karbe H., Fink G.R. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 2009, 132(11):3011-3020.
60. Stratton G.M. Some preliminary experiments on vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review 1896, 3(6):611-617.
61. Striemer C.L., Danckert J. Dissociating perceptual and motor effects of prism adaptation in neglect. Neuroreport 2010, 21(6):436.
62. Striemer C.L., Danckert J.A. Through a prism darkly: Re-evaluating prisms and neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14(7):308-316.
63. Taub E., Goldberg L.A. Prism adaptation: Control of intermanual transfer by distribution of practice. Science (New York, N.Y.) 1973, 180(4087):755-757.
64. Toba M.-N., Cavanagh P., Bartolomeo P. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(2):238-246.
65. Vuilleumier P., Hester D., Assal G., Regli F. Unilateral spatial neglect recovery after sequential strokes. Neurology 1996, 46(1):184-189.
66. Yin P.B., Kitazawa S. Long-lasting aftereffects of prism adaptation in the monkey. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 141(2):250-253.