Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 24, 2013, Pages 6091-6099

  De Cara, María Ángeles Rodríguez ^a   Villanueva, Beatriz ^a   Toro, Miguel Ángel ^b   Fernández, Jesús ^a  

^a INIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

genome wide; management; runs of homozygosity; segments of identity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME-WIDE; GENOMICS; INBREEDING; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MUTATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; RUNS OF HOMOZYGOSITY; SEGMENTS OF IDENTITY;

GENOME-WIDE; MANAGEMENT; RUNS OF HOMOZYGOSITY; SEGMENTS OF IDENTITY;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION;

EID: 84890039522     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12560     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Avila V, Amador C, Garcia-Dorado A, (2010) The purge of genetic load through restricted panmixia in a drosophila experiment. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 1937-1946.
2. Ballou JD, (1997) Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. Journal of Heredity, 88, 169-178.
3. Bjelland DW, Weigel KA, Vukasinovic N, Nkrumah JD, (2012) Evaluation of inbreeding depression in holstein cattle using whole-genome snp markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 1-10.
4. Bosse M, Megens HJ, Madsen O, et al, (2012) Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: Consequence of demography and the recombination landscape. PLoS Genetics, 8, e1003100.
5. Browning SR, Browning BL, (2011) Haplotype phasing: existing methods and new developments. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 703-714.
6. Caballero A, Keightley P, (1994) A pleiotropic nonadditive model of variation in quantitative traits. Genetics, 138, 883-900.
7. de Cara MAR, Fernandez J, Toro MA, Villanueva B, (2011) Using genome-wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 128, 456-464.
8. de Cara MAR, Villanueva B, Toro MA, Fernandez J, (2013) Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings. Heredity, 110, 530-537.
9. Chaix R, Cao C, Donnelly P, (2008) Is mate choice in humans mhc-dependent ? PLoS Genetics 4, e1000184.
10. Fernandez J, Caballero A, (2001) Accumulation of deleterious mutations and equalization of parental contributions in the conservation of genetic resources. Heredity, 86, 480-488.
11. Fernandez J, Toro MA, Caballero A, (2003) Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations. Genetics, 165, 885-894.
12. Fernandez J, Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Toro MA, (2005) Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs. Genetics, 170, 1313-1321.
13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA, (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Garcia-Cortes LA, Martinez-Avila JC, Toro MA, (2010) Fine decomposition of the inbreeding and the coancestry coefficients by using the tabular method. Conservation Genetics, 11, 1945-1952.
15. Garcia-Dorado A, Caballero A, (2000) On the average degree of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations. Genetics, 155, 1991-2001.
16. Gardner A, West SA, Wild G, (2007) Social evolution: The decline and fall of genetic kin recognition. Current Biology, 17, R810-R812.
17. Gardner A, West SA, Wild G, (2011) The genetical theory of kin selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 1020-1043.
18. Gomez-Romano F, Villanueva B, de Cara MAR, Fernandez J, (2013) Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: the effect of marker density and effective population size. Genetics, Selection, Evolution, 45, 38.
19. Grundy B, Villanueva B, Wooliams JA, (1998) Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genetics Research, 72, 159-168.
20. Gusev A, Lowe JK, Stoffel M, et al,. (2009) Whole population, genome-wide mapping of hidden relatedness. Genome Research, 19, 318-326.
21. Hammerly SC, Morrow ME, Johnson JA, (2013) A comparison of pedigree- and DNA-based measures for identifying inbreeding depression in the critically endangered attwaters prairie-chicken. Molecular Ecology, 22, 5313-5328.
22. Kalinowski ST, Hedrick PW, Miller PS, (2000) Inbreeding depression in the speke's gazelle captive breeding programme. Conservation Biology, 14, 1375-1384.
23. Keller MC, Visscher PM, Goddard ME, (2011) Quantification of inbreeding due to distant ancestors and its detection using dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics, 189, 237-249.
24. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP, (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671-680.
25. Laurent R, Toupance B, Chaix R, (2012) Non-random mate choice in humans: insights from a genome scan. Molecular Ecology, 21, 587-596.
26. Malecot G, (1948) Les Mathematiques de lHeredite. Masson et Cie, Paris, France.
27. Meuwissen THE, (1997) Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science, 75, 934-940.
28. Mukai T, Chigusa SI, Mettler LE, Crow JF, (1972) Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 72, 333-355.
29. Nomura T, (2008) Estimation of effective number of breeders from molecular coancestry of single cohort sample. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 462-478.
30. Pemberton TJ, Absher D, Feldman MW, et al,. (2012) Genomic patterns of homozygosity in worldwide human populations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 91, 275-292.
31. Pritchard JK, (2001) Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases?. American Journal of Human Genetics, 69, 124-137.
32. Schoen DJ, David JL, Bataillon TM, (1998) Deleterious mutations accumulation and the regeneration of genetic resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 394-399.
33. Toro MA, Barragan C, Ovilo C, et al,. (2002) Estimation of coancestry in iberian pigs using molecular markers. Conservation Genetics, 3, 309-320.
34. Toro MA, Garcia-Cortes LA, Varona L, (2011) A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers. Genetics, Selection, Evolution, 43, 27.
35. VanRaden PM, (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 4414-4423.
36. Weir BS, Anderson AD, Hepler AB, (2006) Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 771-780.