Maintaining genetic diversity using molecular coancestry: The effect of marker density and effective population size

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Gómez Romano, Fernando ^a   Villanueva, Beatriz ^a   Rodríguez De Cara, María Ángeles ^a   Fernández, Jesús ^a  

^a INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; COMMON ANCESTRY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; DOMESTIC SPECIES; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENEALOGY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NEW SPECIES;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; METHODOLOGY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOTE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84885798993     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-38     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Uses of genomics in livestock agriculture. Goddard ME, Anim Prod Sci 2012 52 73 77 10.1071/AN11180
2. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Santure AW, Stapley J, Ball AD, Birkhead TR, Burke T, Slate J, Mol Ecol 2010 19 1439 1451 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04554.x 20149098
3. Consequences for diversity when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information. Engelsma KA, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL, Windig JJ, J Anim Breed Genet 2011 128 473 481 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00936.x 22059581
4. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Meuwissen THE, J Anim Sci 1997 75 934 940 9110204 (Pubitemid 127441682)
5. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Grundy B, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, Genet Res (Camb) 1998 72 159 168 10.1017/S0016672398003474 (Pubitemid 28563163)
6. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Caballero A, Toro MA, Genet Res (Camb) 2000 75 331 343 10.1017/S0016672399004449 (Pubitemid 30398388)
7. Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs. Fernández J, Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Toro MA, Genetics 2005 170 1313 1321 10.1534/genetics.104.037325 15879510 (Pubitemid 41105484)
8. Using genomic wide information to minimize the loss of diversity in conservation programmes. Rodríguez de Cara MAR, Fernández J, Toro MA, Villanueva B, J Anim Breed Genet 2011 128 456 464 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011. 00971.x 22059579
9. How many SNPs are enough? Smouse PE, Mol Ecol 2010 19 1265 1266 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04555.x 20456228
10. Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10 000 vertebrate species. Genome 10K Community of Scientists, J Hered 2009 100 659 674 19892720
11. Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP, J Anim Sci 1997 75 1738 1745 9222829 (Pubitemid 127444988)
12. The use of mathematical programming to control inbreeding in selection schemes. Fernández J, Toro MA, J Anim Breed Genet 1999 116 447 466 10.1046/j.1439-0388.1999.00196.x (Pubitemid 129639471)
13. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Hill WG, Robertson A, Theor Appl Genet 1968 38 226 231 10.1007/BF01245622
14. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen THE, J Anim Sci 2008 86 2447 2454 10.2527/jas.2007-0010 18407980
15. The impact of high density SNP chips on genomic evaluation in dairy cattle. Harris BL, Johnson DL, Interbull Bull 2010 42 40 43
16. Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportions in finite populations. Wang J, Genet Res (Camb) 1996 68 249 257 10.1017/S0016672300034224 (Pubitemid 27101940)
17. Estimating genetic diversity across the neutral genome with the use of dense marker maps. Engelsma KA, Calus MPL, Bijma P, Windig JJ, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 12 10.1186/1297-9686-42-12 20459708
18. Estimation of coancestry in Iberian pigs using molecular markers. Toro MA, Barragán C, Óvilo C, Rodrigañez J, Rodríguez C, Silió L, Conserv Genet 2002 3 309 320 10.1023/A:1019921131171
19. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. VanRaden PM, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 4414 4423 10.3168/jds.2007-0980 18946147
20. Molecular characterization of breeds and its use in conservation. Toro MA, Fernández J, Caballero A, Livest Sci 2009 120 174 195 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.003
21. Managing individuals' contributions to maximize the allelic diversity maintained in small, conserved populations. Fernández J, Toro MA, Caballero A, Conserv Biol 2004 18 1358 1367 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00341.x (Pubitemid 39348586)
22. Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. Luikart G, Allendorf FW, Cornuet JM, Sherwin WB, J Hered 1998 89 238 247 10.1093/jhered/89.3.238 9656466 (Pubitemid 28292519)
23. Restricting coancestry and inbreeding at a specific position on the genome by using optimized selection. Roughsedge T, Pong-Wong R, Woolliams JA, Villanueva B, Genet Res (Camb) 2008 90 199 208 (Pubitemid 351586897)