Second language gender system affects first language gender classification

Cognitive Aspects of Bilingualism

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 271-299

  Andonova, Elena ^a   Gosheva, Ani ^a   Janyan, Armina ^a   Schaffai, Jasmin Sadat ^b  

^a NEW BULGARIAN UNIVERSITY   (Bulgaria)

^b Institut für Kognitionswissenschaft   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890006882     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5935-3_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Andonova, E., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., and Bates, E. 2004. Gender and lexical access in Bulgarian. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(3): 496-507.
2. Athanasopoulos, P. 2006. Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingual ism: Language and Cognition, 9(1): 89-96.
3. Bassetti, B. 2005. Do Bilingual children think differently? grammatical gender and object perception in Italian-German bilingual children. European Second Language Association conference, Dubrovnik, September 14-17.
4. Bates, E., and MacWhinney, B. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B., and Bates, E. (eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10-75.
5. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D'Amico, S., and Hernandez, A. 1995. Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57: 847-862.
6. Boroditsky, L., and Schmidt, L. 2000. Sex, syntax and semantics. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Philadelphia.
7. Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43: 1-22.
8. Brysbaert, M., Fias, W., and Noel, M. P. 1998. The Whorfian hypothesis and numerical cognition: is "twenty-four" processed in the same way as "four-and-twenty"? Cognition, 66: 51-77.
9. Caplan, D., and Waters, G. S. 1999. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 77-94.
10. Choi, S., and Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Special Issue: Lexical and conceptual semantics. Cognition, 41(1-3): 83-121.
11. Fairclough, N. L. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Harlow: Longman.
12. Flaherty, M. 2001. How a language gender system creeps into perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1): 18-31.
13. Grosjean, F. 2001. The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J. (ed.), One mind, two languages. Oxford: Blackwell. 1-22.
14. Hayakawa, S. I. 1949. Language in thought and action. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
15. Hodge, R., and Kress, G. 1988. Social semiotics. London: Polity Press.
16. Hunt, E. B., and Agnoli, F. 1991. The Whorfian hypothesis: a cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98: 377-389.
17. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. MacDonald, M. C., and Christiansen, M. H. 2002. Reassessing working memory: comment on just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1): 35-54.
19. Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., and Levinson, S. C. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 108-114.
20. Mullen, M. K. 1990. Children's classifications of nature and artifact pictures into female and male categories. Sex Roles 23(9-10): 577-587.
21. Phillips, W., and Boroditsky, L. 2003. Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. In Alterman, R., and Kirsh, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifthAnnual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
22. Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I., and Shapiro, L. 2004. The development of colour categories in two languages: a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133: 554-571.
23. Saussure, F. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Général. Paris: Payot.
24. Sera, M. D., Berge, C. A. H., and del Castillo, P. J. 1994. Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9(3): 261-292.
25. Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M. C., Rodriguez, W., and Dubois, D. P. 2002. When language affects cognition and when it does not: an analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131: 377-397.
26. Slobin, D. 1996. From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking". In Gumperz, J., and Levinson, S.(eds.). Rethinking linguistic relativity. New York: Cambridge University Press: 70-96.
27. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., and Dworzynski, K. 2005. Grammatical gender effects on cognition: implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4): 501-520.
28. Whorf, B. 1956. Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Carroll, J. B. (ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Zubin, D. A., and Koepcke, K. M. 1984. Affect classification in the German gender system. Lingua, 63: 41-96.