Bio-inspired adhesion and adhesives: Controlling adhesion by micro-nano structuring of soft surfaces

Microfluidics and Microfabrication

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 283-307

  Majumder, Abhijit ^a   Sharma, Ashutosh ^a   Ghatak, Animangsu ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

Author keywords

Adhesion enhancement; bio mimetic; carbon noano tube; fibrillar interface; gecko adhesive; hairy adhesive; micro fabricated adhesive; microfluidic adhesive; patterned surface; reusable adhesive; sub surface structures; surface structuring pattering

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889996761     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1543-6_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. Maderson PFA (1964) Keratinized epidermal derivatives as an aid to climbing in gekkonid lizards. Nature 203:780-781.
2. Walker G (1993) Adhesion to smooth surfaces by insects-a review. Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives 13:3-7.
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanaji-Malusare.
4. Frantsevich L and Gorb S (2004) Structure and mechanism of the tarsal chain in the hornet, Vespa crabro (Hymenoptera, Vespidae): implications on the attachment mechanism. Arthr. Struc. Develop. 33:67-89.
5. Dai Z, Gorb SN, and Schwarz U (2002) Roughness-dependant friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scrabaeidae). J. Exp. Biol. 205:2479-2488.
6. Goodwyn PP, Peressadko AP, Schwarz H et al. (2006) Material structure, stiffness and adhesion: why attachment pads of the grasshopper (Tettigonia viridissima) adhere more strongly than those of the locust (Locusta migratoria) (Insecta:Orthopetra). J. Comp. Physiol. A. 192:1233-1243.
7. BarnesWand Jon P (2007) Biomimetic solutions to sticky problems. Science 318:203-204.
8. Northen MT and Turner KL (2005) A batch fabricated biomimetic dry adhesive. Nanotechnology 16:1159-1166.
9. Northen MT and Turner KL (2005) Multi-scale compliant structure for use as a chipscale dry adhesive. The 13th international conference on solid-state sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. Digest of Technical Papers. TRANSDUCERS -05 2:2044-2047.
10. Sitti M and Fearing RS (2003) Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano structures for future wall-climbing robots. International conference on robotics and automation, 1164-1170.
11. Menon C, Murphy M, and Sitti M (2004) Gecko inspired surface climbing robots. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE: International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, 431-436.
12. Cheung E, Karagozler ME, Park S et al. (2005) A new endoscopic microcapsule robot using beetle inspired microfibrillar adhesive. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 551-557.
13. Daltorio KA, Gorb S, Peressadko A et al. (2005) A robot that climbs walls using micro-structured polymer feet. International conference on climbing and walking robots. International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots, London.
14. Mahdavi A, Ferreira L, Sundback C et al. (2007) A biodegradable and biocompatible geckoinspired tissue adhesive, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105:2305-2312.
15. Gay C (2002) Stickiness-some fundamentals of adhesion. Integr.Comp. Biol. 42:1123-1126.
16. Creton C and Papon E (2003) Materials science of adhesives: how to bond things together. MRS Bull. June:419-423.
17. Yarusso DJ (2002) Effect of rheology on PSA performance. In: Dillard DA and Pocius AV (eds.) The Mechanics of Adhesion, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
18. Taljsten B (2005) The importance of bonding-An historic overview and future possibilities. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Bond Behaviour of FRP in Structures 1-10.
19. Dahlquist CA (1969) Pressure Sensitive Adhesives. Vol. 2, Patrick RL (ed) Marcel Dekker, New York.
20. Creton C and Fabre P (2002) Tack. In: Dillard DA and Pocius AV (eds) The Mechanics of Adhesion, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. Chiche A and Creton C (2004) Cavitation in a soft adhesive, Proceedings of the 27th annual adhesion society meeting, Wilmington, 296-298.
22. Ghatak A, ChaudhuryM, Shenoy V et al. (2000) Meniscus instability in confined thin elastic films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:4329-4332.
23. Chung JY, Kim K, Chaudhury MK et al. (2006) Confinement-induced instability and adhesive failure between dissimilar thin elastic films. Euro. Phys. J. E-Soft Matter 20:47-53.
24. Shenoy V and Sharma A (2001) Pattern formation in a thin solid film with interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86:119-122.
25. Sarkar J, Shenoy V, and Sharma A (2004) Patterns, forces and metastable pathways in debonding of elastic films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:018302.
26. Gonuguntala M, Sharma A, Sarkar J et al. (2006) Contact Instability in adhesion and debonding of thin elastic films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97:018303.
27. Creton C (2003) Pressure-sensitive adhesives: An introductory course. MRS Bull. June: 434-439.
28. Chan EP, Greiner C, Arzt E et al. (2007) Design model systems for enhanced adhesion. MRS Bull. 32:496-503.
29. Jagota A and Bennison SJ (2002) Mechanics of adhesion through a fibrillar microstructure. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42:1140-1145.
30. Creton C and Schach R (2009) Diffusion and adhesion. In: Benedek I and Feldstein MM (eds) Handbook of pressure-sensitive adhesive and products, Fundamentals of pressure sensitivity, 1st edn. Taylor and Francis, New York..
31. Creton C and Gorb S (2007) Sticky feet: From animals to materials. MRS Bull. 32:466-472.
32. Arzt E, Gorb S, and Spolenak R (2003) From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100:10603-10606.
33. Ruibal R and Ernst V (1965) The structure of digital setae of lizards. J. Morphol. 117: 271-294.
34. Wainwright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD et al. (1982) Mechanical design in organisms. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
35. Russel AP (1986) The morphological basis of weight-bearing in the scansors of the Tokay gecko (Reptilia, Sauria). Can. J. Zool. 64:948-955.
36. Schleich HH and Kastle W (1986) Ultrastrukturen an Gecko-Zehen (Reptilia, Sauria: Gekkonidae). Amphibia-Reptilia. 7:141-166.
37. Autumn K and Peattie AM (2002) Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42:1081-1090.
38. Irschick DJ, Austin CC, Petren K et al. (1996) A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad-bearing lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59:21-35.
39. Autumn K and Hansen W(2006) Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 192:1205-1212.
40. Autumn K, Hsieh ST, Dudek DM et al. (2006) Dynamics of geckos running vertically. J. Exp. Biol. 209:260-272.
41. Gillett JD and Wigglesworth VB (1932) The climbing organ of an insect, Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Proc. R. Soc. B. 111:364-376.
42. Gorb S, Jiao Y, and Scherge M(2000) Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, Tettigonia). J. Comp. Physiol. A. 186:821-834.
43. Jiao Y, Gorb S, and Scherge M (2000) Adhesion measured on the attachement pads of Tettigonia Viridissima (Orthoptera, Insecta). J. Exp. Biol. 203:1887-1895.
44. Gorb S and Scherge M (2000) Biological microtribology: Anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:1239-1244.
45. Gorb S, Beutel RG, Gorb EV et al. (2002) Structural design and biomechanics of frictionbased releasable attachment devices in insects. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42:1127-1139.
46. Majumder A, Ghatak A, and Sharma A (2007) Microfluidic adhesion induced by subsurface microstructure. Science 318:258-261.
47. Verma MKS, Majumder A, and Ghatak A (2006) Embedded template assisted fabrication of complex microchannels in PDMS and design of a microfluidic adhesive. Langmuir 22:10291-10295.
48. Edward A and Ghatak A (2009) Bioinspired design of a hierarchically structured adhesive. Langmuir 25:611-617.
49. Hora SL (1923) The adhesive apparatus on the toe of certain geckos and tree frogs. J. Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal 9:137-145.
50. Mahendra BC (1941) Contributions to the bionomics, anatomy, reproduction and development of the Indian house gecko Hemidactylus flaviviridis Rüppell. Part II. The problem of locomotion. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sec. B. 13:288-306.
51. Hiller U (1975) Comparative studies on the functional morphology of two gekkonid lizards. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 73:278-282.
52. Gennaro JGJ (1969) The gecko grip. Nat. Hist. 78:36-43.
53. Russell AP (1975) A contribution to the functional morphology of the foot of the tokay, Gekko gecko (Reptilia, Gekkonidae). J. Zool. Lond. 176:437-476.
54. Williams EE and Peterson JA (1982) Convergent and alternative designs in the digital adhesive pads of scincid lizards. Science 215:1509-1511.
55. Stork NE (1980) Experimental analysis of adhesion of Chrysolina polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a variety of surfaces. J. Exp. Biol. 88:91-108.
56. Autumn K, Liang YA, Hsieh ST et al. (2000) Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405:681-685.
57. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YA et al. (2002) Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99:12252-12256.
58. Federle W, Baumgartner W, and Holldobler B (2004) Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: frictional forces are rate and temperature dependent. J. Exp. Biol. 206:67-74.
59. Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R et al. (2005) Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102:16293-16296.
60. Tian Y, Pesika N, Zenget H et al. (2006) Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103:19320-19325.
61. Persson BNJ (2003) On the mechanism of adhesion in biological systems. J. Chem. Phys. 118:7614-7621.
62. Persson BNJ (2007) Biological adhesion for locomotion on rough surfaces: Basic principle and a theorist's view. MRS Bull. 32: 486-490.
63. Persson BNJ and Gorb S (2003) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic plates with application to biological systems. J.Chem. Phys. 119:11437-11444.
64. Autumn K (2007) Gecko Adhesion: Structure, function and applications. MRS Bull. 32: 473-478.
65. Johnson KL, Kendall K, and Roberts AD (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 324:301-313.
66. Spolenak R, Gorb S, and Arzt E (2005) Ahesion design maps for bio-inspired attachment systems. Acta Biomaterialia. 1:5-13.
67. Varenberg M, Peressadko A, Gorb S et al. (2006) Effect of real contact geometry on adhesion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89:121905-121907.
68. Campo AD, Greiner C, and Arzt E (2007) Contact shape controls adhesion of bio-inspired fibrillar surfaces. Langmuir. 23:10235-10243.
69. Spolenak R, Gorb S, Gao H et al. (2005) Effect of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments. Proc. R. Soc. A. 461:305-319.
70. Spuskanyuk AV, McMeeking RM, Deshpande VS et al. (2008) The effect of shape on the adhesion of fibrillar surfaces. Acta Biomaterialia. 4:1669-1676.
71. Gao H and Yao H (2004) Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 21:7851-7856.
72. Hui CY, Glassmaker NJ, Tang T et al. (2004) Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion. J. R. Soc. Lond. Inter. 1:35-48.
73. Tang T, Hui CK, and Glassmaker NJ (2005) Can a fibrillar interface be stronger than a non-fibrillar one? J. R. Soc. Inter. 2:505-516.
74. Ghatak A, Mahadevan L, Chung JY et al. (2004) Peeling from a biomimetically patterned thin elastic film. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 460:2725-2735.
75. Chung JY and Chaudhury MK (2005) Roles of discontinuities in bio-inspired adhesive pads. J. R. Soc. Inter. 2:55-61.
76. Glassmaker NJ, Jagota A, and Hui CY (2005) Adhesion enhancement in a biomimetic fibrillar interface. Acta Biomaterialia 1:367-375.
77. Gay C and Leibler L (1999) Theory of tackiness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:936-939.
78. Federle W (2006) Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J. Exp. Biol. 209:2611-2621.
79. Lake GJ and Thomas AG (1967) The strength of highly elastic materials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 300:108-119.
80. Campolo D, Jones S, Fearing RS et al. (2003) Fabrication of Gecko foot-hair like nano structures and adhesion to random rough surfaces. IEEE Nano 2003, San Fransisco.
81. Gao H, Wang X, Yao H et al. (2005) Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mech. mater. 37:275-285.
82. Majidi C, Groff R, and Fearing RS (2004) Clumping and packing of hair arrays manufactured by nanocasting. ASME International Mechancal Engineering Congress and Exposition. IMECE, California.
83. Sitti M and Fearing RS (2002) Nanomolding based fabrication of synthetic gecko foot hair micro/nanostructures. Proceedings of the IEEE Nanotechnology Conference. Washington 137-140.
84. Shah G and Sitti M (2004) Modeling and design of biomimetic adhesive inspired by gecko foot-hairs. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Bio-Mimetics.
85. Geim AK, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV et al. (2003) Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nat. Mater. 2:461-463.
86. Hui CY, Jagota A, Lin YY et al. (2002) Constraints on micro-contact printing imposed by stamp deformation. Langmuir. 18:1394-1407.
87. Glassmaker NJ, Jagota A, Hui CY et al. (2004) Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1 Making contact. J. R. Soc. Inter. 1:23-33.
88. Greiner C, Arzt E, and Campo A (2009) Hierarchical gecko-like adhesives. Adv. Mater. 21:479-482.
89. Kustandi TS, Samper VD, Yi DK et al. (2007) Fabrication of a gecko-like hierarchical fibril array using a bonded porous alumina template. J. Micromech. Microeng. 17: N75-N81.
90. Yao H and Gao H (2006) Bio-inspired mechanics of robust and releasable adhesion on rough surface. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 54:1120-1146.
91. Bhushan B, Peressadko AG, and Kim TW(2006) Adhesion analysis of two-level hierarchical morphology in natural attachment systems for "smart adhesion". J. Adhesion Sci. Tech. 20:1475-1491.
92. Yao H and Gao H (2007) Mechanical principles of robust and releasable adhesion of gecko. J. Adhesion Sci. Tech. 21:1185-1212.
93. Porwal PK and Hui CY (2007) Strength statistics of adhesive contact between a fibrillar structure and a rough substrate. J. R. Soc. Inter. 5:441-448.
94. Crosby AJ, Hageman M, and Duncan A (2005) Controlling polymer adhesion with "Pancakes". Langmuir 21:11738-11743.
95. Lee H, Lee BP, and Messersmith PB (2007) A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos. Nature 448:338-341.
96. Lamblet M, Verneuil E, and Vilmin T (2007) Adhesion enhancement through micropatterning at polydimethylsiloxane-acrylic adhesive interfaces. Langmuir 23:6966-6974.
97. Reddy S, Arzt E, and Campo A (2007) Bioinspired surfaces with switchable adhesion. Adv. Mater. 19:3833-3837.
98. Northen MT, Greiner C, Arzt E et al. (2008) A gecko inspired reversible adhesive. Adv. Mater. 20:1-5.
99. Gorb S, Varenberg M, Peressadko A et al. (2007) Biomimetic mushroom shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure. J. R. Soc. Inter. 4:271-275.
100. Varenberg M and Gorb S (2008) A beetle-inspired soulution for underwater adhesion. J.R. Soc. Inter. 5:383-385.
101. Glassmaker NJ, Jagota A, Hui CY et al. (2007) Biologically inspired crack trapping for enhanced adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104:10786-10791.
102. Noderer WL, Shen L, Vajpayee S et al. (2007) Enhanced adhesion and compliance of filmterminated fibrillar surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. A 463:2631-2654.
103. Yurdumakan B, Raravikar NR, Ajayan PM et al. (2005) Synthetic gecko goot-hairs from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Commun. 3799:3801.
104. Zhao Y, Tong T, Delzeit L et al. (2006) Interfacial energy and strength of multiwalled carbon nanotube based dry adhesive. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 24:331-335.
105. Ge L, Sethi S, Ci L et al. (2007) Carbon nanotube based synthetic gecko tapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104:10792-10795.
106. Qu L, Dai L, Stone M et al. (2008) Carbon nanotube arrays with strong binding-on and easy normal lifting-off. Science 322:238-242.
107. Sethi S, Ge L, Ci L et al. (2008) Gecko-inspired carbon nanotube-based self-cleaning adhesives. Nano Lett. 8:822-825.
108. Dickrell PL, Sinnott SB, Hahn DW et al. (2005) Frictional anisotropy of oriented carbon nanotube surfaces. Tribol. Lett. 18:59-62.
109. Kinoshita H, Kuma I, Tagawa M et al. (2004) High friction of a vertically aligned carbonnanotube film in microtribology. App. Phys. Lett. 85:2780-2781.
110. Majumder A, Sharma A, and Ghatak A (2009) A bio-inspired wet/dry microfluidic adhesive for aqueous environment. Langmuir. DOI: 10. 1021/la9021849.