Use of extraglottic airways in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic surgery without the need for tracheal intubation

Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 436-441

  Suhitharan, T ^a   Teoh, Wendy H L ^a  

^a KK WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Extraglottic airway devices; i gel; laparoscopic surgery; laryngeal mask airway supreme; leak fraction; leak pressures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRWAY CREATION DEVICE; AIRWAY PRESSURE; AMBULATORY LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EASE OF INSERTION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EXTRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSERTION TIME; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNGEAL MASK; LEAK FRACTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; PHARYNX DISEASE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCT PARAMETERS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORE THROAT; SUCCESSFUL INSERTION RATE; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE;

EID: 84889813696     PISSN: 1658354X     EISSN: 09753125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.121081     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. van Zundert TC, Brimacombe JR, Ferson DZ, Bacon DR, Wilkinson DJ. Archie brain: Celebrating 30 years of development in laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2012;67:1375-85.
2. T immermann A, Russo SG. Which airway should I use? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007;20:595-9.
3. L im Y, Goel S, Brimacombe Jr. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is an effective alternative to laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation for gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007;35:52-6.
4. A sai T, Liu EH. The i-gel, a new supraglottic airway. Masui 2010;59:794-7.
5. Bamgbade OA, Macnab WR, Khalaf WM. Evaluation of the i-gel airway in 300 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:865-6.
6. Gatward JJ, Cook T M, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2008;63:1124-30.
7. Fernández Díez A, Pérez Villafañe A, Bermejo González JC, Marcos Vidal JM. Supreme laryngeal mask airway vs the I-gel supraglottic airway in patients under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation with no neuromuscular block: A randomized clinical trial. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2009;56:474-8.
8. Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:264-8.
9. Maharjan SK. I-gel for positive pressure ventilation. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2013;52:255-9.
10. Helmy AM, Atef HM, El-Taher EM, Henidak A M. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients. Saudi J Anaesth 2010;4:131-6.
11. Van Zundert TC, Brimacombe Jr. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme laryngeal masks. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2012;63:35-41.
12. R ujirojindakul P, Prechawai C, Watanayomnaporn E. Tongue numbness following laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ and i-gel™ insertion: Two case reports. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:1200-3.
13. R usso SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2012;109:996-1004.
14. Ismail SA, Bisher NA, Kandil HW, Mowafi HA, Atawia HA. Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses to insertion of the i-gel, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011;28:443-8.
15. Zaballos M, Bastida E, del Castillo T, de Villoria JG, Jiménez C. In vitro study of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts of six supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia 2010;65:569-72.
16. L aw J, Bair A, Capra J, Holder A, Allen R. Characterization of airway device cuff volumes at simulated altitude. Aviat Space Environ Med 2011;82:555-8.
17. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros A M. The I-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: An observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;53:376-9.
18. D as B, Mitra S, Jamil SN, Varshney R K. Comparison of three supraglottic devices in anesthetised paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:224-8.
19. Fukuhara A, Okutani R, Oda Y. A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: Performance and fiberoptic findings. J Anesth 2013;27:1-6.
20. Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Oswald E, Perkhofer D, Tonin A, Keller C, et al. LMA ProSeal (TM) vs. i-Gel (TM) in ventilated children: A randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:1321-4.
21. Goyal R, Shukla R N, Kumar G. Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2012;22:355-9.
22. T heiler L G, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009;111:55-62.