Integrating the management of ruaha landscape of tanzania with local needs and preferences

Environmental Management

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1533-1546

  Masozera, Michel ^a   Erickson, Jon D ^b   Clifford, Deana ^c   Coppolillo, Peter ^d   Sadiki, Harrison G ^e   Mazet, Jonna K ^f  

^a Widlife Conservation Society Africa Program   (Rwanda)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^d Working Dogs for Conservation   (United States)

^e PREDICT Tanzania ^*  (Tanzania)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Africa; Community wildlife management associations; Community based conservation; Conjoint analysis; National parks; Ruaha; Tanzania

Indexed keywords

AFRICA; COMMUNITY-BASED CONSERVATIONS; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; NATIONAL PARKS; RUAHA; TANZANIA; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

REGIONAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; CONSENSUS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNMENT; LANDSCAPE; TANZANIA; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; CONSUMER; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

IRINGA [TANZANIA]; RUAHA NATIONAL PARK; TANZANIA;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; CONSENSUS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ORGANIZATIONS; TANZANIA;

EID: 84889764694     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0175-9     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baidu-Forson JB, N'tare R, Waliyar F (1997) Utilizing conjoint analysis to design modern crop varieties: empirical example for groundnut in Niger. J Agric Econ 16(3):219-226
2. Barrett CB, Grizzle RE (1999) A holistic approach to sustainability based on pluralistic stewardship. Environ Ethics 21:23-42
3. Bishop AJ, Marteau TM, Armstrong D, Chitty LS, Longworth L, Buxton MJ, Berlin C (2004) Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111:775-779
4. Blom B, Sunderland T, Murdiyarso D (2010) Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environ Sci Policy 13:164-172
5. Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, Swait J, Williams M, Louviere J (1996) A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecol Econ 18:243-253
6. Cattin P, Wittink DR (1982) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey. J Mark 46:44-53
7. Cernea MM, Schmidt-Soltau K (2006) Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Dev 34:1808-1830
8. Coppolillo P, Dickman A (2007) Livelihoods and protected areas in the Ruaha landscape: a preliminary review. In: KH Redford and E Fearn (Eds), Protected areas and human livelihoods. Working Paper No. 12. Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, pp 6-16
9. Coppolillo P, Demment M, Mbano B, Bergin S, Forrest J (2006) Current wetlands management practices in the Usangu Sub catchments: a review of drivers, pressures, state, impacts and responses. Wildlife Conservation Society, Consultancy Report, 26p
10. Clifford D, Kazwala R, Coppolillo P, Mazet, J (2008) Evaluating and managing zoonotic disease risk in rural Tanzania. Research Brief 08-01-HALI. Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program (GL-CRSP), University of California, Davis
11. Dennis DF (1998) Analyzing public inputs to multiple objective decisions on national forests using conjoint analysis. Forest Sci 44(3):421-429
12. Doornbos M, Saith A, White B (2000) Forest lives and struggles: an introduction. Dev Change 31:1-10
13. Ervin J (2003) Rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. BioScience 53(9):833-841
14. Farber S, Griner B (2000) Using conjoint analysis to value ecosystem change. Environ Sci Technol 34(8):1407-1412
15. Fitzpatrick E, Coyle DE, Durieux-Smith A, Graham ID, Angus DE, Gaboury I (2007) Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: a conjoint analysis study. Ear Hearing 28(6):842-849
16. Flintan F (1999) Unheard voices in a white man's wilderness? Women in conservation and development. Master's thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
17. Gbadegesin A, Ayileka O (2000) Avoiding the mistakes of the past: towards a community oriented management strategy for the proposed national park in Abuja, Nigeria. Land Use Policy 17(2):89-100
18. Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamowicz W (1998) Using choice experiments to value the environment-design issues, current experience and future prospects. Environ Resour Econ 11(3-4):413-428
19. Hermans C, Erickson JD, Sheldon A, Noordewier T, Kline M (2007) Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of multicriteria decision analysis in the white river watershed of Vermont, USA. J Environ Manage 84:534-546
20. Himmelfarb D (2007) Locating trade-offs in conservation: looking back over three decades of changes in conservation practice and decision making. Working paper. Advancing conservation in a social context. MacArthur Foundation and University of Georgia
21. Hutton JM, Leader-Williams N (2003) Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: realigning human and conservation interests. Oryx 37:215-226
22. Institute of Resource Assessment (IRA) (2007) Assessment and evaluation of wildlife management areas in Tanzania. Consultancy Report, 87 pp
23. Ite UE (1996) Community perceptions of the Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Environ Conserv 23:351-357
24. Judge CG, Griffiths WE, Hill RC, Lutkepohl H, Lee TC (1985) The theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 109 pp
25. Kadigi RMJ, Kashaigili JJ, Mdoe NS (2004) The economics of irrigated paddy in Usangu Basin in Tanzania: water utilization, productivity, income and livelihood implications. Phys Chem Earth 29(15-18):1091-1100
26. Kouadio T, Mulumba K, Merle DF, Brent S (2003) Using conjoint analysis to estimate farmer's preferences for cattle traits in West Africa. Ecol Econ 45(3):393-407
27. Kuhfeld WF, Tobias RD, Garratt M (1994) Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J Mark Res 31(4):545-557
28. Lancaster KJ (1991) Modern consumer theory. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
29. Louviere JJ (1994) Conjoint analysis. In: Bagozzi R (ed) Advanced marketing research. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA, pp 223-259
30. Masozera M, Erickson JD, Clifford D, Coppolillo P, Mazet J, Nguvava M, Sadiki H (2010) Public health and rural livelihoods under water scarcity in the Ruaha Landscape, Tanzania. Research brief 10-04-HALI. Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program (GL-CRSP), University of California, Davis
31. McElwee PD (2010) Resource use among rural agricultural households near protected areas in Vietnam: the social costs of conservation and implications for enforcement. Environ Manage 45:113-131
32. McKelvey RD, Zavoina W (1975) A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. J Math Sociol 4:103-120
33. McPeak J, Doss C (2006) Do pastoral husbands and wives in Northern Kenya view milk markets differently? Research Brief 06-02-PARIMA. Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program (GL-CRSP), University of California, Davis
34. Mills MGL, Freitag S, Van Jaarsveld AS (2001) Geographic priorities for carnivore conservation in Africa. In: Gittleman JL, Funk SM, Macdonald DW, Wayne RK (eds) Carnivore conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 467-480
35. MNRT (Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism) (2005) The wildlife conservation (tourist hunting) regulations. Government Printer, Dar es Salaam
36. Neumann RP (1998) Imposing wilderness: struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 256 pp
37. Nguvava M, Clifford D, Masozera M, Coppolillo P, Sadiki H, Mazet J, Erickson, JD (2009) Capturing women's voices: socioeconomics and gender-roles in pastoralist households in the Ruaha Landscape, Tanzania. Research Brief: 09-03-HALI. Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program (GL-CRSP), University of California, Davis
38. Olson DM, Dinerstein E (1998) The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the earth's most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv Biol 12:502-515
39. Ratchford BT (1975) The new economic theory of consumer behavior: an interpretive essay. J Consum Res 2:65-75
40. Rolfe J, Barnett J, Louviere JJ (2000) Choice modeling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecol Econ 35(2):289-302
41. Ryan M (1999) Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application of in vitro fertilization. Soc Sci Med 48(4):535-546
42. Ryan M, Farrar S (2000) Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Br Med J 320:1530-1533
43. Salafsky N, Wollenberg E (2000) Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Dev 28:1421-1438
44. Sayer J, Wells MP (2004) The pathology of projects. In: McShane T, Wells M (eds) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 35-48
45. Schwartzman S, Nepstad D, Moreira A (2000) Arguing tropical forest conservation: people versus parks. Conserv Biol 14:1370-1374
46. Songorwa AN (1999) Community based wildlife management in Tanzania: are communities interested? World Dev 27(12):2061-2079
47. Songorwa AN, Buhrs T, Hughey KFD (2000) Community based wildlife management in Africa: a critical assessment of the literature. Nat Resour J 40:603-643
48. Terborgh J, van Schaik C, Davenport L, Rao M (eds) (2002) Making parks work: strategies for preserving tropical nature. Island Press, Washington, DC
49. Wainwright C, Wehrmeyer W (1998) Success in integrating conservation and development? A study from Zambia. World Dev 26(6):933-944
50. Wardman M (1988) A comparison of revealed preference and stated preference models. J Transp Econ Policy 22:71-91
51. WCS (2005) Wildlife Conservation Society. http://www.wcs.org/sw-high- tech-tools/wildlifehealthscience/fvp/168570/168612/animalhealthmatters/168789
52. Wells M, Brandon K (1992) People and parks: linking protected areas management with local communities. Washington, DC: World Bank/World Wildlife Fund/US Agency for International Development. ISBN: 0-821-32053-X
53. Wells M, McShane T (2004) Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. AMBIO 33(8):513-519
54. Western D, Wright RM (eds) (1994) Natural connections: perspectives in community based conservation. Island Press, Washington DC
55. Wilhelm WB, Mottner S (2005) A conjoint analysis approach to understanding the generational shift toward an experience economy. J Shopp Center Res 12(1):23-52
56. Wilkie DS, Morelli GA, Demmer J, Starkey M, Telfer P, Steil M (2006) Parks and people: assessing the human welfare effects of establishing protected areas for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 20:247-249
57. Wilkie DS, Redford KH, McShane (2010) Taking of rights for natural resource conservation: a discussion about compensation. J Sustain Forest 29(2-4):135-151
58. Wittermyer G, Elsen P, Bean WT, Coleman A, Burton O, Brashares JS (2008) Accelerated human population growth at protected areas edges. Science 321:123-126
59. Zia A, Hirsch P, Songorwa A, Mutekanga D, O'Connor S, McShane T, Brosius JP, Norton B (2011) Cross-scale value trade-offs in managing social-ecological systems: the politics of scale in Ruaha National Park, Tanzania. Ecol Soc 16(7):7