Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: A conjoint analysis study

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 842-849

  Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth ^a   Coyle, Douglas E ^a   Durieux Smith, Andrée ^a   Graham, Ian D ^a   Angus, Douglas E ^a   Gaboury, Isabelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY SCREENING; CANADA; CHILD; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FAMILY; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PARENT; PATIENT CARE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISABLED CHILDREN; FAMILY; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PARENTS; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 35848931442     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318157676d     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Albus, C., Schmeisser, N., Salzberger, B., & Fatkenheuer, G. (2005). Preferences regarding medical and psychosocial support in HIV-infected patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 56, 16-20.
2. Bishop, A. J., Marteau, T. M., Armstrong, D., Chitty, L. S., Longworth, L., Buxton, M. J., et al. (2004). Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 775-779.
3. Bradley, M. (1991). User's manual for the SPEED version 2.1 stated preference editor and designer. Hague: Hague Consulting Group.
4. Calderon, R. (2000). Parent involvement in deaf children's education programs as a predictor of a child's language, early reading, and social-emotional development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 140-155.
5. Canadian Working Group on Childhood Hearing. (2005). Early hearing and communication development: Canadian working group on childhood hearing (CWGCH) resource document. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
6. Fitzpatrick, E., Graham, I. D., Durieux-Smith, A., Angus, D., & Coyle, D. (2007). Parents' perspectives on the impact of the early diagnosis of childhood hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology, 46, 97-106.
7. Hyde, M. L. (2005). Newborn hearing screening programs: overview. Journal of Otolaryngology, 34, S70-S78.
8. Jahng, K. H., Martin, L. R., Golin, C. E., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2005). Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 57, 308-314.
9. Jerger, S., Roeser, R. J., & Tobey, E. A. (2001). Management of hearing loss in infants: the UTD/Callier Center position statement. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 329-336.
10. Kirkland, C. E. (1999). Evaluation of captioning features to inform development of digital television captioning capabilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 144, 250-260.
11. Meister, H., Lausberg, I., Walger, M., & von Wedel, H. (2001). Using conjoint analysis to examine the importance of hearing aid attributes. Ear and Hearing, 22, 142-150.
12. Moeller, M. P. (2000). Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics, 106, E43.
13. Ratcliffe, J., Buxton, M., McGarry, T., Sheldon, R., & Chancellor, J. (2004). Patients' preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology, 43, 337-345.
14. Ratcliffe, J., Van Haselen, R., Buxton, M., Hardy, K., Colehan, J., & Partridge, M. (2002). Assessing patients' preferences for characteristics associated with homeopathic and conventional treatment of asthma: a conjoint analysis study. Thorax, 57, 503-508.
15. Robinshaw, H., & Evans, R. (2003). Service provision for preschool children who are deaf: parents' perspectives. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 2, 3-39.
16. Roush, J. (2000). Implementing parent-infant services: advice from families. In Seewald, R. C. (Ed.), A sound foundation through early amplification: Proceedings of an International Conference (pp. 159-166). Chicago: Phonak AG.
17. Ryan, M. (1999). Using conjoint analysis to go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 535-546.
18. Ryan, M., & Farrar, S. (2000). Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. British Medical Journal, 320, 1530-1533.
19. Ryan, M., McIntosh, E., & Shackley, P. (1998). Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. Health Economics, 7, 373-378.
20. StataCorp. (2001). Statistical Software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
21. Tattersall, H., & Young, A. (2005). Deaf children identified through newborn hearing screening: parents' experiences of the diagnostic process. Child: Care, Health and Development, 32, 33-45.
22. Vick, S., & Scott, A. (1998). Agency in health care. Examining patient preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 587-605.
23. Viney, R., Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2002). Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Research, 2, 319-326.
24. Fitzpatrick, E., Angus, D., Durieux-Smith, A., Graham, I. D., & Coyle, D. Parents' needs following identification of childhood hearing loss. American Journal of Audiology, (accepted).