Extending the limits of paper recycling: Improvements along the paper value chain

Forest Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 471-483

  Blanco, A ^a   Miranda, R ^a   Monte, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Environmental awareness; Paper recycling; Paper value chain; Recovered paper; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889689644     PISSN: 21715068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2013223-03677     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Blanco A, Negro C, Monte C, Fuente H, Tijero J, 2002. Overview of the two major deposit problems in recycling: slime and stickies. Part II: Stickies problems in recycling. Prog Pap Recycl 11: 26-37.
2. Blanco A, Negro C, Monte C, Fuente H, Tijero J, 2004. The challenges of sustainable papermaking. Environ Sci Technol 38: 414A-420A.
3. Bobu E, Ciolacu F, 2008. Evaluation of neutral deinking methods in processing different printed papers. Cellulose Chem Technol 42: 403-412.
4. Bobu E, Iosip A, Ciolacu F, 2010. Potential benefits of recovered paper sorting by advanced technology. Cellul Chem Technol 44: 461-471.
5. CEPI, 2003a. The European paper industry on the road to sustainable development. Brussels (Belgium).
6. CEPI, 2003b. Summary of the study on non-collectable and non-recyclable paper products. Brussels (Belgium). The European Paper industry on the road to Sustainable Development.
7. CEPI, 2006. Special Recycling 2005 Statistics. Brussels (Belgium).
8. CEPI, 2011. 2010 Annual Recycling Statistics. Brussels (Belgium). European Comission. 2011. Communication on tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials, COM(2011) 25 Final.
9. Delagoutte T, 2005. Management and control of stickies. Prog Pap.Recycl 15: 31-41.
10. Delozier G, Deng Y, 2003. Enhanced flotation deinking of 100% flexographic ONP using surfactant spray technique in the presence of siloxane-based defoamer. Prog Pap Recycl 13: 5-11.
11. Emerson D, 2004.Single stream vs. source separated recycling. BioCycle 45: 22-25.
12. ERPC (European Recovered Paper Council), 2009. Assessment of print product recyclability - Deinkability Score - User's Manual. Brussels (Belgium).
13. EPRC (European Recovered Paper Council), 2011a. European Declaration on Paper Recycling 2011-2015. Brussels (Belgium).
14. ERPC (European Recovered Paper Council), 2011b. Assessment of printed product recyclability. Scorecard for the removabiity of adhesive applications. Brussels (Belgium).
15. Faul A, 2005. Quality aspects of recovered paper for deinking. Prog Pap Recycl 15: 6-10.
16. Faul A, 2010. Quality requirements in graphic paper recycling. Cellul Chem Technol 44: 451-460.
17. Faul AM, Putz HJ, 2009. Scoring deinkability. Prog Pap Recycl 18: 17-22.
18. Guo J, Severtson SJ, Kroll SM, 2004. Role of paper face stock properties in determining removal efficiencies of pressure-sensitive adhesive films from recycling operations. Ind Eng Chem Res 43: 1443-1450.
19. Guo J, Severtson SJ, Gwin LE, 2007. Optimizing the monomer composition of acrylic water-based pressure-sensitive adhesives to minimize their impact on recycling operations. Ind Eng Chem Res 4: 2753-2759.
20. th CTP/PTS Advanced Training Course in Deinking Technology, Grenoble (France), June 3-5.
21. Hanecker E, Faul A, 2007. Changes in the quality characteristics of recycled fibre pulps. Das Papier 1-2: 54-56.
22. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Venditti, RA, 2006. Control of tacky deposits on paper machines: a review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 21: 154-171.
23. Ibarra D, Monte MC, Blanco A, Martínez AT, Martínez MJ, 2012. Enzymatic deinking of secondary fibers: cellulo-lytic enzymes versus laccase-mediator system. J Ind Microbio and Biotechnol 39: 1-9.
24. ITENE (Research and Technology Centre of Packaging, Transport and Logistics), 2012. Environmental impacts of freighting paper for recycling to China. Valencia (Spain).
25. Levlin J-E, Read B, Grossmann H, Hooimeijer A, Ervasti I, Lozo B et al., 2010. The future of paper recycling in europe: opportunities and limitations. Cost Office. Available at: http://www.cost-e48.net/thebook.htm
26. Miranda R, Bobu E, Grossmann H, Stawicki B, Blanco A, 2010. Factors influencing a higher use of recovered paper in the European paper industry. Cellul Chem Technol 44: 419-430.
27. Miranda R, Blanco A, 2010. Environmental awareness and paper recycling. Cellul Chem Technol 44: 431-449.
28. Miranda R, Monte MC, Blanco A, 2011. Impact of increased collection rates and the use of commingled collection systems on the quality of recovered paper. Part 1: Increased collection rates. Waste Manage 31: 2208-2216.
29. Miranda R, Monte MC, Blanco A,. 2013. Analysis of the quality of the recovered paper from commingled collection systems. Res Cons Recycl 72: 60-66.
30. Monte MC, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C, 2009. Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manage 29: 293-308.
31. Nowak MJ, Severtson SJ, Wang XP, Kroll MS, 2003. Properties controlling the impact of styrenic block copo-lymer based pressure-sensitive adhesives on paper recycling. Ind Eng Chem Res 42: 1681-1687.
32. Oldack RC, Gustafson FJ, 2005. Initiative to promote environmentally benign adhesives (IPEBA): solving a sticky issue. Prog Pap Recycl 14: 6-8.
33. OJ. 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union L 312 22/11/2008. pp: 3-30.
34. Putz HJ, 2007. Recyclability of paper and board products. Int Papwirtsch 4: 37.
35. th ed.
36. Sacia WK, Simmons J, 2006. The effects of changing ONP quality on a newsprint mill. Tappi J.5: 13-17.
37. Sánchez A, 2009. Graphic paper recycling - markets and quality requirements. Proceedings of COST Action E48 The Limits of Paper Recycling - The Final Conference, Munich (Germany), May 6-7, paper 5.
38. Severtson SJ, Wang X, Kroll MS, 2002. Development of environmentally benign pressure-sensitive adhesive systems via modification of substrate properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 41: 5668-5675.
39. Venditti RA, Lucas BE, Jameel H, 2007.The effects of adhesive properties on the removal of pressure sensitive adhesive contaminants by pressure screens. Prog Pap Re-cycl 16: 18-31.
40. Villanueva A, Eder P, 2011. End-of-waste criteria for waste paper: technicalproposals. Final report. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission, Seville (Spain).
41. Wagner J, Franke T, Schabel S, 2006. Automatic sorting of recovered paper: technical solutions and their limitations. Prog Pap Recycl 16: 13-23.
42. White C, 2007. Quality matters: the mill buyers perspective. European Paper Recycling Conference, Amsterdam (The Netherlands), Oct. 3-5.
43. Yan Z, Deng Y, 2003. Water-soluble/dispersible ca-tionic pressure-sensitive adhesives. I. Adhesives from solution polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 1624-1630.