Factors influencing a higher use of recovered paper in the european paper industry

Cellulose Chemistry and Technology

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 419-430

  Miranda, Ruben ^a   Bobu, Elena ^b   Grossmann, Harald ^c   Stawicki, Bartek ^d   Blanco, Angeles ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b GHEORGHE ASACHI TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF IASI   (Romania)

^c DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d Centre of Competence Paper and Board   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Competitiveness; COST Action E48; European paper industry; Paper recycling; Recovered paper

Indexed keywords

CERTAIN FACTOR; COMPETITIVENESS; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; EUROPEAN PAPER INDUSTRIES; EUROPEAN PAPER INDUSTRY; PAPER AND BOARDS; PAPER RECYCLING; RECOVERED PAPER; RECYCLABILITY; RECYCLING INDUSTRY;

COSTS; PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY; RAW MATERIALS; RECOVERY; RECYCLING;

COMPETITION;

COMPETITION; EUROPE; PAPER; PAPER INDUSTRY; PULP INDUSTRY; RAW MATERIALS; RECOVERY; RECYCLING;

EID: 79951641729     PISSN: 05769787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. European Declaration on Paper Recycling 2006-2010, European Recovered Paper Council (ERPC), Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
2. European Declaration on Paper Recycling 2006-2010, Monitoring Report 2008, European Recovered Paper Council (ERPC), Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
3. A. Blanco, C. Negro, C. Monte, E. Fuente and J. Tijera, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 414 (2004).
4. Ervasti, in Procs. Limits of Paper Recycling-COST Action E48: The Final Conference, Munich, Germany, May 6-7, 2009.
5. Vision 2030: The European forest-based sector plays a key role in a sustainable society, ForestBased Sector Technology Platform, Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
6. CEPI, "Competitiveness", http://www.cepi.org /Content/Default.asp?pageid=56
7. CEPI 2008 Key Statistics, CEPI, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
8. Summary of the study on non-collectable and non-recyclable paper products, CEPI, 2003, Available at: http://www.paperrecovery.org/files /non%20coll%20Summ-074440A.pdf
9. A. Faul, Prog. Paper Recycling, 15, 6 (2005).
10. M. Fairbank, D. Keenan, H. Peters and M. Prein, Pulp Pap. Can., 107, 64 (2006).
11. T. Delagoutte, Prog. Paper Recycling, 15, 31 (2005).
12. D. Emerson, BioCycle, 45, 22 (2004).
13. W. K. Sacia and J. Simmons, Tappi J., 5, 13 (2006).
14. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives.
15. B. Bolaane, Habitat Int., 30, 731 (2006).
16. S. Suttibak and V. Nitivattananon, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 53, 45 (2008).
17. R. Miranda and A. Blanco, Cellulose Chem. Technol., (COST E48 special volume), in print.
18. CEPI Special Recycling 2005 Statistics, CEPI, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
19. J. Wagner and L. Bulow, Int. Papwirtsch., 1-2, 49 (2007).
20. H. J. Putz, Sorting, in "Handbook of Pulp", edited by H. Sixta, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 2006, vol. 2, part 3, chapter 7, pp. 1187-1190.
21. A. Sánchez, in Procs. Limits of Paper Recycling - COST Action E48: The Final Conference, Munich, Germany, May 6-7, 2009.
22. J. Wagner, T. Franke and S. Schabel, Prog. Paper Recycling, 16, 13 (2006).
23. G. Galland, B. Carre, B. Fabry and F. Julien Saint Amand, Rev. ATIP, 60, 6 (2006).
24. H.-J. Putz, Int. Papwirtsch., 4, 37 (2007).
25. A. M. Faul and H.-J. Putz, Prog. Paper Recycling, 18, 17(2009).
26. "The future of paper recycling in Europe: Opportunities and limitations", European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), Brussels, Belgium, 2009.