Impact of increased collection rates and the use of commingled collection systems on the quality of recovered paper. Part 1: Increased collection rates

Waste Management

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2208-2216

  Miranda, Ruben ^a   Concepcion Monte, M ^a   Blanco, Angeles ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collection rate; Collection systems; Paper recycling; Quality; Recovered paper

Indexed keywords

COLLECTION SYSTEMS; CURRENT LIMITS; FUTURE CHALLENGES; LIGHTWEIGHT COATED PAPER; MOISTURE CONTENTS; PAPER RECYCLING; RECOVERED PAPER; RECOVERED PAPER COLLECTION; SOCIAL ISSUES;

MOISTURE; MOISTURE DETERMINATION; RECYCLING;

RECOVERY;

MOISTURE CONTENT; RECYCLING; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE FACILITY; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE TRANSPORT; WASTEPAPER;

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONTAMINATION; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUROPEAN UNION; HOUSEHOLD; INDUSTRY; LEISURE; MOISTURE; PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RECYCLING; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPAIN; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

CITIES; PAPER; RECYCLING; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SPAIN;

MADRID [SPAIN]; SPAIN;

EID: 80052349060     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ASPAPEL and REPACAR, 2008. Determination of the composition of materials and moisture content of recovered paper and board. Madrid (Spain) [in Spanish].
2. Blanco A. Microbiology in papermaking. Recent Research Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 1 2003, 87-134. Research Signpost, Trivandrum (India). S.G. Pandalay (Ed.).
3. Bösner, J.-K., Hirsch, G., Putz, H.-J., Weinert, S., 2008. Quality properties of the most important recovered paper grades in dependence of sorting conditions (AiF-Project 15408 N)" In: COST E48 Meeting, Budapest (Hungary), 15-16 May.
4. PI C.E. 2009 CEPI Key Statistics 2010, CEPI, Brussels (Belgium).
5. Clapp D. Single-stream collection systems offer obstacles and opportunities. Pulp Pap. 2006, 80(6):36-37.
6. De Feo G., De Gisi S. Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: a sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge. Waste Manage. 2010, 30(6):958-976.
7. Emerson D. Single stream vs. source separated recycling. Biocycle 2004, 45(3):22-25.
8. EN 643: European List of Standard Grades of Recovered Paper and Board, 2002. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels (Belgium).
9. ERPC (European Recovered Paper Council) European Declaration on Paper Recycling 2006-2010 2006, ERPC, Brussels (Belgium).
10. ERPC (European Recovered Paper Council) European Declaration on Paper Recycling 2006-2010: Monitoring Report 2009 2010, ERPC, Brussels (Belgium).
11. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official journal of the European Union L312, 3-30 (22.11.2008).
12. Fairbank M., Keenan D., Peters H., Prein M., Schwarzbach A., Wells L. Effect of recovered paper quality and deinking process parameters on dirt levels in newsprint. Pulp Pap. Can. 2006, 107(12):64-67.
13. Faul A. Quality aspects of recovered paper for deinking. Prog. Pap. Recycl. 2005, 15(1):6-10.
14. Faul, A., 2009. Graphic paper recycling - markets and quality requirements. In: COST Action E48 Final Conference: The limits of paper recycling, Munich (Germany), 6-7 May.
15. Faul A. Quality requirements in graphic paper recycling. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2010, 44(10):451-460.
16. Kinsella S., Gertman R. Single stream recycling best practices manual and implementation guide. Prog. Pap. Recycl. 2008, 17(3):6-8.
17. Levlin J.-E., Read B., Grossmann H., Hooimeijer A., Ervasti I., Lozo B., Saint-Amand F.J., Cochaux A., Faul A., Ringman J., Stawicki B., Bobu E., Miranda R., Blanco A., Stanic M. COST action E48 - The Future of Paper Recycling in Europe: Opportunities and Limitations 2010, COST, Brussels (Belgium).
18. Miranda, R., Blanco, A., 2008a. Paper recovery in Spain. Ingeniería Química 464, 130-139 [in Spanish].
19. Miranda R., Balea A., Sanchez de la Blanca E., Carrillo I., Blanco A. Identification of recalcitrant stickies and their sources in newsprint production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47(16):6239-6250.
20. Miranda R., Bobu E., Grossmann H., Stawicki B., Blanco A. Factors influencing a higher use of recovered paper in the European paper industry. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2010, 44(10):419-430.
21. Miranda R., Blanco A. Environmental awareness and paper recycling. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2010, 44(10):431-449.
22. Miranda, R., Blanco, A., 2010c. Influence of pulping chemistry on the release of contaminants in recycled paper production. In: PTS Symposium Applied Interface Chemistry, Munich (Germany), 9-10 February.
23. Monte M.C., Fuente E., Blanco A., Negro C. Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manage. 2009, 29(1):293-308.
24. Neukum, P., Renner, K., Putz, H.-J., 2001. Effect of paper collection on recovered paper characteristics and DIP quality. In: 5th CTP/PTS Advanced Training Course on Deinking, Grenoble (France), 23-26 March.
25. Patrick K. Stickies, still a critical concern for today's recycling plants. Pap. Age 2006, 122:28-31.
26. Roring, A., Soede, O., Hegdal, A., Rangul, B., 2006. In: 12th PTS-CTP Deinking Symposium Proceedings. Leipzig (Germany), April 25-27.
27. Sacia W.K., Simmons J. The effects of changing ONP quality on a newsprint mill. Tappi J. 2006, 5(1):13-17.
28. Schmidt J.H., Holm P., Merrild A., Christensen P. Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy - a Danish case study on waste paper. Waste Manage. 2007, 27:1519-1530.
29. Spiess W., Renner K. Improving the efficiency of recovered paper screening or how to effectively control stickies. Wochenbl. Papierfabr. 2004, 132(17):1002-1009.
30. Stawicki, B., Westenbroek, A., 2005. Composition of coarse rejects. Inventory in the Dutch recycled paper mills. In: COST E48 Meeting, Brussels (Belgium), 28-29 November.
31. Strunz, A.-M., 2005. Recovered paper grades for the production of packaging papers. In: COST E48 Meeting, Brussels (Belgium), 28-29 November.
32. Villanueva A., Eder P. End-of-waste criteria for waste paper: technical proposals. Final report 2011, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission, Seville (Spain).
33. Villanueva A., Wenzel H. Paper waste - recycling Incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessment. Waste Manage. 2007, 27(8):S29-S46.
34. Wagner J., Franke T., Schabel S. Automatic sorting of recovered paper - technical solutions and their limitations. Prog. Pap. Recycl. 2006, 16(1):13-23.
35. Wagner J., Franke T., Schabel S. Automatic sorting of recovered paper: technical solutions and their limitations. Rev. ATIP 2007, 61(1):14-21.
36. White, C., 2007. Quality matters: the mill buyer's perspective. In: European Paper Recycling Conference. Amsterdam (The Netherlands), 3-5 October.
37. WRAP (The Waste and Resources Action Programme), 2004. Optimising the Value of Recovered Fibre. WRAP, Oxon (United Kingdom).