Erratum to Comparison of far and near contrast sensitivity in patients symmetrically implanted with multifocal and monofocal IOLs. (Eur J Ophthalmol, (2014), 24, 1, 44-52, 10.5301/ejo.5000335);Comparison of far and near contrast sensitivity in patients symmetrically implanted with multifocal and monofocal IOLs

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 44-52

  Gil, Miguel A ^a   Varón, Consuelo ^b   Cardona, Genís ^b   Vega, Fidel ^b   Buil, José A ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE LA SANTA CREU I SANT PAU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Far contrast sensitivity; Monofocal intraocular lens; Multifocal intraocular lens; Near contrast sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS; MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPAIN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VERY ELDERLY;

EID: 84889689085     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/EJO.2015.15172     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Ginsburg AP. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984;61:403-7.
2. Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R, Varssano D, Grinbaum A. Contrast sensitivity after wave front-guided LASIK. Ophthalmology 2004;111:454-7.
3. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Visual function 15 years after optic neuritis: a final follow-up report from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1079-82.
4. Kim CY, Chung S-H, Kim TI, Cho YJ, Yoon G, Seo KY. Comparison of higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity in monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Yonsei Med J 2007;48:627-33.
5. Hayashi K, Manabe S, Hayashi H. Visual acuity from far to near and contrast sensitivity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with a low addition power. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:2070-6.
6. Montés-Micó R, España E, Bueno I, Charman WN, Menezo JL. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses. Mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 2004;111:85-96.
7. Montés-Micó R, Alió JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:703-11.
8. Martínez Palmer A, Gómez Faiña P, España Albelda A, Comas Serrano M, Nahra Saad D, Castilla Céspedes M. Visual function with bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Refract Surg 2008;24:257-64.
9. Fernández-Vega L, Alfonso J F, Baamonde MB, Montés-Micó R. Symmetric bilateral implantation of a distance-dominant diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1913-7.
10. Sen HN, Sarikkola AU, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L. Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:2483-93.
11. Alfonso J F, Fernández-Vega L, Baamonde MB, Montés-Micó R. Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1235-43.
12. Alfonso J F, Fernández-Vega L, Baamonde MB, Montés-Micó R. Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:430-8.
13. Gil MA, Varon C, Rosello N, Cardona G, Buil JA. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, subjective quality of vision, and quality of life with 4 different multifocal IOLs. Eur J Ophthalmol 2012;22:175-87.
14. Alfonso J F, Fernández-Vega L, Blázquez JI, Montés-Micó R. Visual function comparison of 2 aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:242-8.
15. Pandita D, Raj SM, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Kazi NS, Vasavada AR. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens: prospective randomized masked clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:603-10.
16. Mesci C, Erbil H, Ozdoker L, Karakurt Y, Bilge AD. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Ophthal-mol 2010;20:90-100.
17. Mester U, Hunold W, Wesendahl T, Kaymak H. Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1033-40.
18. Sasaki A. Initial experience with a refractive multifocal intraocular lens in a Japanese population. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1001-7.
19. Lane SS, Morris M, Nordan L, Packer M, Tarantino N, Wallace RB III. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006;19:89-105.
20. Denoyer A, Le Lez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: effect of contrast sensitivity and wave-front aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:210-6.
21. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA. Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:986-92.
22. Davison JA, Simpson MJ. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:849-58.
23. Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L, et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:712-7.
24. Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Normalized contrast sensitivity values. J Refract Surg 1998;14:463-6.
25. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA, Patla AE, Whitaker D. Effect of a cataract simulation on clinical and real world vision. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:799-804.
26. de Vries NE, Nuijts RMMA. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:268-78.
27. Campbell FW, Green DG. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity. Nature 1965;208:191-2.
28. Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, et al. Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:827-32.
29. Rocha KM, Chalita MR, Souza CE, et al. Postoperative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of a multifocal apodized diffractive IOL (ReSTOR) and three monofocal IOLs. J Refract Surg 2005;21:S808-12.
30. Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery. A systematic review. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1789-98.
31. Alió JL, Piñero D P, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJ. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:241-50.
32. Rocha KM, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, et al. Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a randomized prospective study. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:750-6.
33. Mester U, Dillinger P, Anterist N. Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:652-60.
34. Tzelikis P F, Akaishi L, Trindade FC, Boteon JE. Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a comparative study. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:827-33.
35. Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A. Analysis of the possible benefits of aspheric intraocular lenses: review of the literature. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35: 172-81.
36. Montés-Micó R, Charman WN. Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2001;17:646-51.