Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 90-100

  Mesci, Cem ^a   Erbil, Hasan ^a   Özdöker, Levent ^a   Karakurt, Yücel ^a   Bilge, Ayse Dolar ^a  

^a GOZTEPE TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Accommodative intraocular lens; Contrast sensitivity; Multifocal intraocular lens

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATIVE LENS IMPLANT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; MALE; MULTIFOCAL LENS IMPLANT; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 76649099773     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067211002000112     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1243-55.
2. Sasaki A. Initial experience with a refractive multifocal intraocular lens in a Japanese population. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 1001-7.
3. Javitt J, Brauweiler H-P, Jacobi KW, et al. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes: multicenter clinical in Germany and Austria. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 1356-66.
4. Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 2040-8.
5. Montés-Micó R, Alió JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 703-11.
6. Montés-Micó R, Espa a E, Bueno I, et al. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 85-96.
7. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Lüke C, et al. Multifocal intraocular lens implantation in prepresbyopic patients with unilateral cataract. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 680-6.
8. Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, et al. Visual performance of Acrysof Restor apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 827-32.
9. Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005; 16: 33-7.
10. Vingolo EM, Grenga P, Iacobelli L, et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: Acrysof Restor apodized diffractive versus Acrysof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1244-7.
11. Claoué C. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 2088-2091.
12. Küchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 318-24.
13. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1307-12.
14. Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost DJ, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO Array zonal progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1243-55.
15. Chiamp PJ, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK, et al. Restor intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1459-63.
16. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A, AT-45 Study Group. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 2005-9.
17. Olsen T, Corydon L. Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16: 703-6.
18. Walkow T, Liekfeld A, Anders N, et al. A prospective evaluation of a diffractive versus refractive designed multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1380-6.
19. Williamson W, Poirier L, Coulon P, Verin P. Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity). Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 249-51.
20. Boesten IE, Beekhuis WH, Hassmann E, et al. Comparison of the Storz bifocal zonal and the 3M diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995; 21: 437-41.
21. Gimbel HV, Sanders DR, Raanan MG. Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 881-8.
22. Ravalico G, Parentin F, Baccara F. Effect of astigmatism on multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 804-7.
23. Ravalico G, Parentin F, Sirotti P, Baccara F. Analysis of light energy distribution by multifocal intraocular lenses through an experimental optical model. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 647-52.
24. Pieh S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability with diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 659-62.
25. Pieh S, Marvan P, Lackner B, et al. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in model eye; point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 23-8.
26. el-Maghraby A, Marzouky A, Gazayerli E, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses. Visual and refractive comparisons. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18: 147-52.