Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 712-717

  Bellucci, Roberto ^a,e   Scialdone, Antonio ^b   Buratto, Lucio ^c   Morselli, Simonetta ^a   Chierego, Chiara ^a   Criscuoli, Alessandra ^b   Moretti, Giuseppe ^b   Piers, Patricia ^d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b University Hospital of Milan   (Italy)

^c CAMO   (Italy)

^d Pharmacia   (Netherlands)

^e BORGO TRENTO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSEUDOPHAKIA; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 19344374372     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.049     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. C. Owsley, R. Sekuler, and D. Siemsen Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood Vision Res 23 1983 689 699
2. A. Glasser, and M.C.W. Campbell Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age Vision Res 38 1998 209 229
3. P. Artal, E. Berrio, A. Guirao, and P. Piers Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 19 2002 137 143
4. G. Smith, M.J. Cox, R. Calver, and L.F. Garner The spherical aberration of the crystalline lens of the human eye Vision Res 41 2001 235 243
5. D.A. Atchison Design of aspheric intraocular lenses Ophthalmic Physiol Optics 11 1991 137 146
6. J.T. Holladay, P.A. Piers, and G. Koranyi A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes J Refract Surg 18 2002 683 691
7. R. Bellucci, S. Morselli, and P. Piers Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses J Refract Surg 20 2004 297 306
8. A.P. Ginsburg Contrast sensitivity and functional vision Int Ophthalmol Clin 43 2 2003 5 16
9. A.P. Ginsburg, D.W. Evans, M.W. Cannon Jr., and C. Owsley Large-sample norms for contrast sensitivity Am J Optom Physiol Opt 61 1984 80 84
10. C. Akkin, S.A. Özler, and J. Mentes Tilt and decentration of bag-fixated intraocular lenses: a comparative study between capsulorhexis and envelope techniques Doc Ophthalmol 87 1994 199 209
11. K. Hayashi, M. Harada, and H. Hayashi Decentration and tilt of polymethyl methacrylate, silicone, and acrylic soft intraocular lenses Ophthalmology 104 1997 793 798
12. F.M. Mutlu, A.H. Bilge, H.I. Altinsoy, and E. Yumusak The role of capsulotomy and intraocular lens type on tilt and decentration of polymethylmethacrylate and foldable acrylic lenses Ophthalmologica 212 1998 359 363
13. U. Mester, P. Dillinger, and N. Anterist Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study J Cataract Refract Surg 29 2003 652 660
14. M. Packer, I.H. Fine, R.S. Hoffman, and P.A. Piers Prospective randomised trial of an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens J Refract Surg 18 2002 692 696
15. M. Packer, I.H. Fine, R.S. Hoffman, and P.A. Piers Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg 30 2004 986 992
16. H.B. Dick, F. Krummenauer, and O. Schwenn Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation Ophthalmology 106 1999 1878 1886
17. A.J. Afsar, S. Patel, R.L. Woods, and W. Wykes A comparison of visual performance between a rigid PMMA and a foldable acrylic intraocular lens Eye 13 1999 329 335