Influence of canopy budget model approaches on atmospheric deposition estimates to forests

Biogeochemistry

Volumn 116, Issue 1-3, 2013, Pages 215-229

  Adriaenssens, Sandy ^a,d   Staelens, Jeroen ^a,e   Baeten, Lander ^a   Verstraeten, Arne ^b   Boeckx, Pascal ^a   Samson, Roeland ^c   Verheyen, Kris ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^d Belgian Interregional Environment Agency   (Belgium)

^e Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Atmospheric deposition; Canopy budget model; Nitrogen; Throughfall; Trend analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ACIDIFICATION; ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; CONIFEROUS TREE; CRITICAL LOAD; DECIDUOUS TREE; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; ION EXCHANGE; LEACHING; NITROGEN; THROUGHFALL; TREND ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84889667606     PISSN: 01682563     EISSN: 1573515X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-013-9846-0     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adriaenssens S (2012) Dry deposition and canopy exchange for temperate tree species under high nitrogen deposition. PhD thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
2. Adriaenssens S, Staelens J, Wuyts K, De Schrijver A, van Wittenberghe S, Wuytack T, Kardel F, Verheyen K, Samson R, Boeckx P (2011) Foliar nitrogen uptake from wet deposition and the relation with leaf wettability and water storage capacity. Water Air Soil Pollut 219: 43-57.
3. Adriaenssens S, Hansen K, Staelens J, Wuyts K, De Schrijver A, Baeten L, Boeckx P, Samson R, Verheyen K (2012a) Throughfall deposition and canopy exchange processes along a vertical gradient within the canopy of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Sci Total Environ 420: 168-182.
4. Adriaenssens S, Staelens J, Wuyts K, Samson R, Verheyen K, Boeckx P (2012b) Canopy retention of dissolved inorganic nitrogen by foliage and twigs of four temperate tree species. Ecosystems, in press, DOI: 10. 1007/s10021-012-9568-5.
5. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26: 32-46.
6. Clark KL, Nadkarni NM, Gholz HL (2005) Retention of inorganic nitrogen by epiphytic bryophytes in a tropical montane forest. Biotropica 37: 328-336.
7. Clarke N, Zlindra D, Ulrich E, Mosello R, Derome J, Derome K, König N, Lövblad G, Draaijers GPJ, Hansen K, Thimonier A, Waldner P (2010) Sampling and analysis of deposition. Part XIV. In: Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre, Hamburg, Germany (www. icp-forests. org/Manual. htm).
8. Craenen H, van Ranst E, Tack FMG, Verloo MG (2000) Calculation and mapping of critical loads of sulfur and nitrogen in Flanders, Belgium. Sci Total Environ 254: 55-64.
9. Dail DB, Hollinger DY, Davidson EA, Fernandez I, Sievering HC, Scott NA et al (2009) Distribution of nitrogen-15 tracers applied to the canopy of a mature spruce-hemlock stand, Howland, Maine, USA. Oecologia 160: 589-599.
10. De Couck N (2011) Veranderingen in de boomlaag in het Aelmoeseneiebos en de impact op strooisel, bodem en kruidlaag. Ghent University, M. Sc. thesis.
11. De Schrijver A, Geudens G, Augusto L, Staelens J, Mertens J, Wuyts K, Gielis L, Verheyen K (2007) The effect of forest type on throughfall deposition and seepage flux: a review. Oecologia 153: 663-674.
12. de Vries W, Reinds GJ, van der Salm C, Draaijers G, Bleeker A, Erisman JW (2001) Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe. Technical report 2001. Brussels, Geneva: EC-UN/ECE.
13. de Vries W, Vel E, Reinds GJ, Deelstra H, Klap JM, Leeters EEJM, Hendriks CMA, Kerkvoorden M, Landmann G, Herkendell J, Haussmann T, Erisman JW (2003a) Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe - 1. Objectives, set-up and evaluation strategy. For Ecol Manage 174: 77-95.
14. de Vries W, Vel EM, Reinds GJ, Deelstra H, Klap JM, Leeters EEJM et al (2003b) Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe. 1. Objectives, set-up and evaluation strategy. For Ecol Manage 174: 77-95.
15. de Vries W, van der Salm C, Reinds GJ, Erisman JW (2007) Element fluxes through European forest ecosystems and their relationships with stand and site characteristics. Environ Pollut 148: 501-513.
16. Draaijers G, Erisman JW (1995) A canopy budget model to assess atmospheric deposition from throughfall measurements. Water Air Soil Pollut 85: 2253-2258.
17. Draaijers GPJ, Erisman JW, VanLeeuwen NFM, Romer FG, teWinkel BH, Veltkamp AC, Vermeulen AT, Wyers GP (1997) The impact of canopy exchange on differences observed between atmospheric deposition and throughfall fluxes. Atmos Environ 31: 387-397.
18. Emmett BA, Boxman D, Bredemeier M, Gundersen P, Kjonaas OJ, Moldan F, Schleppi P, Tietema A, Wright RF (1998) Predicting the effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in conifer stands: evidence from the NITREX ecosystem-scale experiments. Ecosystems 1: 352-360.
19. Erisman JW, Beier C, Draaijers G, Lindberg S (1994) Review of deposition monitoring methods. Tellus Series B-Chem Phys Meteorol 46: 79-93.
20. Ferm M, Hultberg H (1999) Dry deposition and internal circulation of nitrogen, sulphur and base cations to a coniferous forest. Atmos Environ 33: 4421-4430.
21. Fowler D, Pilegaard K, Sutton MA, Ambus P, Raivonen M, Duyzer J et al (2009) Atmospheric composition change: ecosystems-atmosphere interactions. Atmos Environ 43: 5193-5267.
22. Friedland AJ, Miller EK, Battles JJ, Thorne JF (1991) Nitrogen deposition, distribution and cycling in a subalpine spruce-fir forest in the Adirondecks, New York, USA. Biogeochemistry 14: 31-55.
23. Fritz O, Niklasson M, Churski M (2008) Tree age is a key factor for the conservation of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests. App Veg Sci 12: 93-106.
24. Garland JA (2001) On the size dependence of particle deposition. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 1: 323-332.
25. Gomez-Guerrero A, Chavez-Aguilar G, Fenn ME, Vargas-Hernandez J, Horwath WR (2008) Foliar nitrogen uptake in simulated wet deposition in Abies religiosa. Interciencia 33: 429-434.
26. Graf Pannatier E, Thimonier A, Schmitt M, Walthert L, Waldner P (2011) A decade of monitoring at Swiss Long-Term Forest Ecosystem Research (LWF) sites: can we observe trends in atmospheric acid deposition and in soil solution acidity? Environ Monitor Asses 174: 3-30.
27. Harrison AF, Schulze E-D, Gebauer G, Bruckner G (2000) Canopy uptake and utilization of atmospheric pollutant nitrogen. Pages 171-188 in Schulze E-D, ed. Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in European Forest Ecosystems, vol. 142 Ecological Studies.
28. Horvath L(2004) Determination of the nitrogen compound balance between the atmosphere and a Norway spruce forest ecosystem. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 70: 143-146.
29. Houle D, Ouimet R, Paquin R, Laflamme J (1999) Interactions of atmospheric deposition with a mixed hardwood and a coniferous forest canopy at the Lake Clair Watershed (Duchesnay, Quebec). Can J For Res 29: 1944-1957.
30. Ignatova N, Dambrine E (2000) Canopy uptake of N deposition in spruce (Picea abies L Karst) stands. Ann For Sci 57: 113-120.
31. Johansson O, Nordin A, Olofsson J, Palmqvist K (2010) Responses of epiphytic lichens to an experimental whole-tree nitrogen-deposition gradient. New Phytol 188: 1075-1084.
32. Kendall M (1975) Multivariate analysis. Charles Griffin & Company, London.
33. Lang GE, Reiners WA, Heier RK (1976) Potential alteration of precipitation chemistry by epiphytic lichens. Oecologia 25: 229-241.
34. Lindberg SE, Lovett GM, Richter DD, Johnson DW (1986) Atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of major ions in a forest. Science 231: 141-145.
35. Lovett GM, Nolan SS, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ (1996) Factors regulating throughfall flux in a New Hampshire forested landscape. Can J For Res 26: 2134-2144.
36. Neary AJ, Gizyn WI (1994) Throughfall and stemflow chemistry under deciduous and coniferous forest canopies in south-central Ontario. Can J For Res 24: 1089-1100.
37. Neirynck J, Janssens IA, Roskams P, Quataert P, Verschelde P, Ceulemans R (2008) Nitrogen biogeochemistry of a mature Scots pine forest subject to high nitrogen loads. Biogeochemistry 91: 201-222.
38. Parker GG (1983) Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Adv Ecol Res 13: 57-133.
39. Ranius T, Johansson P, Berg N, Niklasson M (2008) The influence of tree age and microhabitat quality on the occurrence of crustose lichens associated with old oaks. J Veg Sci 19: 653-662.
40. Reiners WA, Olson RK (1984) Effects of canopy components on throughfall chemistry - an experimental-analysis. Oecologia 63: 320-330.
41. Rothe A, Huber C, Kreutzer K, Weis W (2002) Deposition and soil leaching in stands of Norway spruce and European Beech: results from the Höglwald research in comparison with other European case studies. Plant Soil 240: 33-45.
42. Ruijgrok W, Davidson CI, Nicholson KW (1995) Dry deposition of particles. Implications and recommendations for mapping of deposition over Europe. Tellus 47B: 587-601.
43. Ruijgrok W, Tieben H, Eisinga P (1997) The dry deposition of particles to a forest canopy: a comparison of model and experimental results. Atmos Environ 31: 399-415.
44. Sievering H, Tomaszewski T, Torizzo J (2007) Canopy uptake of atmospheric N deposition at a conifer forest: part I - Canopy N budget, photosynthetic efficiency and net ecosystem exchange. Tellus B59: 483-492.
45. Slinn WGN (1982) Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies. Atmos Environ 16: 1785-1794.
46. Staelens J, De Schrijver A, van Avermaet P, Genouw G, Verhoest N (2005) A comparison of bulk and wet-only deposition at two adjacent sites in Melle (Belgium). Atmos Environ 39: 7-15.
47. Staelens J, De Schrijver A, Verheyen K (2007) Seasonal variation in throughfall and stemflow chemistry beneath a European beech (Fagus sylvatica) tree in relation to canopy phenology. Can J For Res 37: 1359-1372.
48. Staelens J, Houle D, De Schrijver A, Neirynck J, Verheyen K (2008) Calculating dry deposition and canopy exchange with the canopy budget model: review of assumptions and application to two deciduous forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 191: 149-169.
49. Staelens J, Neirynck J, Genouw G, Roskams P (2009) Dynamic modelling of target loads of acidifying deposition for forest ecosystems in Flanders (Belgium). Iforest-Biogeosci For 2: 30-33.
50. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (www. R-project. org).
51. UBA (2004) Mapping manual 2004. Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads & levels and air pollution effects, risks and trends. Source: www. icpmapping. org.
52. Ukonmaanaho L, Starr M (2002) Major nutrients and acidity: budgets and trends at four remote boreal stands in Finland during the 1990s. Sci Total Environ 297: 21-41.
53. Vanguelova EI, Benham S, Pitman R, Moffat AJ, Broadmeadow M, Nisbet T, Durrant D, Barsoum N, Wilkinson M, Bochereau F, Hutchings T, Broadmeadow S, Crow P, Taylor P, Houston TD (2010) Chemical fluxes in time through forest ecosystems in the UK - Soil response to pollution recovery. Environ Pollut 158: 1857-1869.
54. Wanek W, Hinko-Najera Umana N (2010) Large canopy exchange fluxes of inorganic and organic nitrogen and preferential retention of nitrogen by epiphytes in a tropical lowland rainforest. Ecosystems 13: 367-381.
55. Wilson EJ, Tiley C (1998) Foliar uptake of wet-deposited nitrogen by Norway spruce: an experiment using N-15. Atmos Environ 32: 513-518.
56. Zhang G, Zeng GM, Jiang YM, Du CY, Huang GH, Zeng M, Su XK, Xiang RJ (2006) Exchange of proton and major elements in two-layer canopies under acid rain in a subtropical evergreen forest in central-south China. J Integ Plant Biol 48: 1154-1162.