fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness

NeuroImage

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 709-718

  Langers, Dave R M ^a,b,c   van Dijk, Pim ^a,b,c   Schoenmaker, Esther S ^d   Backes, Walter H ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND INTENSITY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOUND; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 33947184379     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ANSI, 1960. American Standard Acoustical Terminology. American National Standards Institute, New York.
2. Belin P., McAdams S., Smith B., Savel S., Thivard L., Samson S., and Samson Y. The functional anatomy of sound intensity discrimination. J. Neurosci. 18 (1998) 6388-6394
3. Bilecen D., Seifritz E., Scheffler K., Henning J., and Schulte A.C. Amplitopicity of the human auditory cortex: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 710-718
4. Blankenburg F., Taskin B., Ruben J., Moosmann M., Ritter P., Curio G., and Villringer A. Imperceptible stimuli and sensory processing impediment. Science 299 (2003) 1864
5. Brechmann A., Baumgart F., and Scheich H. Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study. J. Neurophysiol. 87 (2002) 423-433
6. Buxton R.B., Uludag K., Dubowitz D.J., and Liu T.T. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. NeuroImage 23 Suppl. 1 (2004) S220-S233
7. Dean I., Harper N.S., and McAlpine D. Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1684-1689
8. Drevets W.C., Burton H., Videen T.O., Snyder A.Z., Simpson Jr. J.R., and Raichle M.E. Blood flow changes in human somatosensory cortex during anticipated stimulation. Nature 373 (1995) 249-252
9. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., Summerfield A.Q., Elliott M.R., Gurney E.M., and Bowtell R.W. Sparse temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7 (1999) 213-223
10. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Akeroyd M.A., Summerfield A.Q., Palmer A.R., Elliott M.R., and Bowtell R.W. Modulation and task effects in auditory processing measured using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 10 (2000) 107-119
11. Hall D.A., Haggard M.P., Summerfield A.Q., Akeroyd M.A., Palmer A.R., and Bowtell R.W. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 1559-1570
12. Hart H., Palmer A., and Hall D. Heschl's gyrus is more sensitive to tone level than non-primary auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 171 (2002) 177
13. Hart H.C., Hall D.A., and Palmer A.R. The sound-level-dependent growth in the extent of fMRI activation in Heschl's gyrus is different for low- and high-frequency tones. Hear. Res. 179 (2003) 104-112
14. Heinz M.G., and Young E.D. Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurophysiol. 91 (2004) 784-795
15. Jäncke L., Shah N.J., Posse S., Grosse Ryuken M., and Muller Gartner H.W. Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 875-883
16. Jäncke L., Wustenberg T., Schulze K., and Heinze H.J. Asymmetric hemodynamic responses of the human auditory cortex to monaural and binaural stimulation. Hear. Res. 170 (2002) 166-178
17. Katz J. Handbook of Clinical Audiology (2001), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
18. Lamore J.J., and Rodenburg M. Significance of the SISI test and its relation to recruitment. Audiology 19 (1980) 75-85
19. Langers D.R., Backes W.H., and van Dijk P. Spectrotemporal features of the auditory cortex: the activation in response to dynamic ripples. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 265-275
20. Langers D.R., Van Dijk P., and Backes W.H. Interactions between hemodynamic responses to scanner acoustic noise and auditory stimuli in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 53 (2005) 49-60
21. Logothetis N.K., and Wandell B.A. Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 66 (2004) 735-769
22. London M., and Hausser M. Dendritic computation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28 (2005) 503-532
23. Martin F.N. Introduction to audiology (1996), A Viacom Company, Needham Heights, MA
24. McDermott H.J., Lech M., Kornblum M.S., and Irvine D.R. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (1998) 2314-2325
25. Mohr C.M., King W.M., Freeman A.J., Briggs R.W., and Leonard C.M. Influence of speech stimuli intensity on the activation of auditory cortex investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105 (1999) 2738-2745
26. Moore B.C. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear. 17 (1996) 133-161
27. Moore B.C. An introduction to the psychology of hearing (2003), Academic Press, London
28. Morita T., Naito Y., Nagamine T., Fujiki N., Shibasaki H., and Ito J. Enhanced activation of the auditory cortex in patients with inner-ear hearing impairment: a magnetoencephalographic study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114 (2003) 851-859
29. Mulert C., Jager L., Propp S., Karch S., Stormann S., Pogarell O., Moller H.J., Juckel G., and Hegerl U. Sound level dependence of the primary auditory cortex: Simultaneous measurement with 61-channel EEG and fMRI. NeuroImage (2005)
30. Oxenham A.J., and Bacon S.P. Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear. 24 (2003) 352-366
31. Rauschecker J.P. Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems. Trends Neurosci. 22 (1999) 74-80
32. Scarff C.J., Dort J.C., Eggermont J.J., and Goodyear B.G. The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 22 (2004) 341-349
33. Sigalovsky I.S., and Melcher J.R. Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers. Hear. Res. 215 (2006) 67-76
34. Talavage T.M., Edmister W.B., Ledden P.J., and Weisskoff R.M. Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7 (1999) 79-88
35. Thivard L., Belin P., Zilbovicius M., Poline J.B., and Samson Y. A cortical region sensitive to auditory spectral motion. NeuroReport 11 (2000) 2969-2972
36. Yetkin F.Z., Roland P.S., Christensen W.F., and Purdy P.D. Silent functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of tonotopicity and stimulus intensity coding in human primary auditory cortex. Laryngoscope 114 (2004) 512-518