Beyond the Box: Television and the Internet

Beyond the Box: Television and the Internet

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-270

  Ross, Sharon Marie ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889484698     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444304817     Document Type: Book

References (205)

1. Allen, R. (1985). Speaking of Soaps. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
2. Allen, R. C. and Hill, A. (2004). Introduction to Part Seven: Transforming Television. In Allen, R. and Hill, A. (eds.) The Television Studies Reader. Routledge, New York, pp. 535-42.
3. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. B. Brewster. Monthly Review Press, New York, pp. 127-86.
4. Ang, I. (1982). Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. Trans. Della Couling. Routledge, London.
5. Arthur, K. (2005). Tweener TV Dials in to Teen Wishes. Chicago Tribune, Tempo. August 8.
6. Baym, N. (1998). Talking About Soaps: Communicative Practices in a Computer-Mediated Fan Culture. In Harris, C. and Alexander, A. (eds.) Theorizing Fandom: Fans, Subculture and Identity. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, pp. 111-29.
7. Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations. Ed. H. Arendt, trans. H. Zohn. Schocken Books, New York (orig. pub. 1955).
8. Bird, S. E. (2003). The Audience in Everyday Life: Living in a Media World. Routledge, New York.
9. Bird, S. E. and Jorgensen, J. (2002). Extending the School Day: Gender, Class and the Incorporation of Technology in Everyday Life. In Consalvo, M. and Paasonen, S. (eds.) Women and Everyday Uses of the Internet: Agency and Identity. Peter Lang, New York, pp. 255-74.
10. Brooker, W. (2004). Living on Dawson's Creek: Teen Viewers, Cultural Conver gence, and Television Overflow. In Allen, R. and Hill, A. (eds.) The Tele vision Studies Reader. Routledge, New York, pp. 569-80 (orig. pub. 2001).
11. Brown, M. (1990). Motley Moments: Soap Operas, Carnival, Gossip and the Power of the Utterance. In Brown, M. (ed.) Television and Women's Culture: The Politics of the Popular. Sage, London, pp. 183-98.
12. Bury, R. (2005). Cyberspaces of Their Own: Female Fandoms Online. Peter Lang, New York.
13. Caldwell, J. (2002). Interactive Audience? In Harries, D. (ed.) The New Media Book. BFI, London, pp. 127-44.
14. Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. Routledge, New York.
15. Code, L. (1991). What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press, New York.
16. Cowie, E. (1997). Representing Woman: Cinema and Psychoanalysis. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
17. Ellis, J. (2000). Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty. I. B. Tauris, New York.
18. Fiske, J. (1987). Television Culture. Methuen, New York.
19. Gledhill, C. (ed.) (1991). Stardom: Industry of Desire. Routledge, New York.
20. Gwenllian-Jones, S. (2004). Virtual Reality and Cult Television. In Gwenllian-Jones, S. and Pearson, R. (eds.) Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 83-97.
21. Gwenllian-Jones, S. (2003). Web Wars: Online Fandom and Studio Censorship. In Jancovich, M. and Lyons, J. (eds.) Quality Popular Television: Cult TV, the Industry and Fans. BFI, London, pp. 163-77.
22. Gwenllian-Jones, S. and Pearson, R. (2004). Introduction. In Gwenllian-Jones, S. and Pearson, R. (eds.) Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis pp. ix-xx.
23. Hayward, J. (1997). Consuming Pleasures: Active Audiences and Serial Fictions from Dickens to Soap Opera. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington.
24. Hills, M. (2004). Dawson's Creek: "Quality Teen TV" and "Mainstream Cult." In Davis, G. and Dickinson, K. (eds.) Teen TV: Genre, Consumption and Identity. BFI, London, pp. 54-67.
25. Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. Routledge, New York.
26. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press, New York.
27. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Cultures. Routledge, New York.
28. Johnson, D. (2007). Inviting Audiences In: The Spatial Reorganization of Production and Consumption in "TV III." New Review of Film and Television Studies vol. 5 (no. 1 April), 61-80.
29. Kuhn, A. (1992). Women's Genres. In Caughie, J. and Kuhn, A. (eds.) The Sexual Subject: A Screen Reader in Sexuality. Comp. Mandy Merck. Routledge, New York, pp. 301-11 (orig. pub. in Screen vol. 25, no.1, Winter 1984: 18-28).
30. Lancaster, K. (2001). Interacting with Babylon 5: Fan Performances in a Media Universe. University of Texas Press, Austin.
31. Mittell, J. (2006). Narrative Complexity in Contemporary American Television. The Velvet Light Trap (no. 58 Fall), 29-40.
32. Modleski, T. (1982). Loving With A Vengeance: Mass-Produced Fantasies for Women. Methuen, New York.
33. Napoli, P. (2003). Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace. Columbia University Press, New York.
34. Parks, S. (1997). Pleasurable Contradictions: Perceptions and Negotiations of Xena. Unpublished Masters thesis, Ohio State University.
35. Price water house Coopers. (2006) The Rise of Lifestyle Media: Achieving Success in the Digital Convergence Era.
36. Romenesko, J. (1993). The Zine Explosion. American Journalism Review 15 (no. 3 April), 39.
37. Ross, S. (2002). Super (Natural) Women: Female Heroes, Their Friends, and Their Fans. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
38. Schatz, T. (1997). Boom and Bust: American Cinema in the 1940s, vol.6. University of California Press, Los Angeles.
39. Stacey, J. (1994). Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. Routledge, New York.
40. Staiger, J. (1992). Interpreting Films: Studies in the Historical Reception of America Cinema. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
41. Swann, P. (2000). TV dot Com: The Future of Interactive Television. TV Books, New York.
42. Tulloch, J. (1990). Television Drama: Agency, Audience and Myth. Routledge, New York.
43. Williams, R. (1980). Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays. Verso and NLB, New York.
44. Acosta, B. (2002). Fandemonium! Cult Television Shows and the Power of Positive Letter-Writing. Austin Chronicle (February 15) pp. 40-2.
45. Allen, R. (1992). Audience-Oriented Criticism and Television. In Allen, R. (ed.) Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, pp. 101-37.
46. Baym, N. (2000). Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
47. Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations. Ed. H. Arendt, trans. H. Zohn. Schocken Books, New York (orig. pub. 1955).
48. Bird, S. E. (2003). The Audience in Everyday Life: Living in a Media World. Routledge, New York.
49. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
50. Brown, M. (1991). Knowledge and Power: An Ethnography of Soap-Opera Viewers. In Vande Berg, L. and Wenner, L. (eds.) Television Criticism:Approaches and Applications. Langman, New York, pp. 178-98.
51. Brown, M. (1990). Motley Moments: Soap Operas, Carnival, Gossip and the Power of the Utterance. In Brown, M. (ed.) Television and Women's Culture: The Politics of the Popular. Sage, London, pp. 183-98.
52. Brunsdon, C. (1981). Crossroads: Notes on Soap Opera. Screen 22, no. 4:32-7.
53. Brunsdon, C. (1997). Screen Tastes: Soap Opera to Satellite Dishes. Routledge, New York.
54. Bury, R. (2005). Cyberspaces of Their Own: Female Fandoms Online. Peter Lang, New York.
55. Cantwell, M. (2004). Collapsing the Extra/Textual: Passions and Intensities of Knowledge in Buffy the Vampire Slayer Online Communities. Refractory:A Journal of Entertainment Media 2 (vol. 5), available at www.refractory.unimelb.edu.au/journalissues/vol5/cantwell.html. Accessed July 8, 2007.
56. Ellis, J. (2000). Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty. I. B. Tauris, New York.
57. Fiske, J. (1987). Television Culture. Methuen, New York.
58. Gwenllian-Jones, S. (2004). Virtual Reality and Cult Television. In Gwenllian-Jones, S. and Pearson, R. (eds.) Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 83-97.
59. Gwenllian-Jones, S. (2003). Web Wars: Online Fandom and Studio Censorship. In Jancovich, M. and Lyons, J. (eds.) Quality Popular Television: Cult TV, the Industry and Fans. BFI, London, pp. 163-77.
60. Gwenllian-Jones, S. and Pearson, R. (eds.) (2004). Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press
61. Minneapolis Harris, C. (1998) A Sociology of Television Fandom. In Harris, C. and Alexander, A. (ed.) Theorizing Fandom: Fans, Subculture and Identity. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, pp. 41-54.
62. Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. Routledge, New York.
63. Holloway, D. (2001). Trekkies Rejoice: UPN Coming Back to Time Warner. Austin American Statesman (June 20), p. B3.
64. Jancovich, M. and Hunt, N. (2004). The Mainstream, Distinction, and Cult TV. In Gwenllian-Jones, S. and Pearson, R. (eds.) Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 27-44.
65. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Cultures. Routledge, New York.
66. Kuhn, A. (1992). Women's Genres. In Caughie, J. and Kuhn, A. (eds.) The Sexual Subject: A Screen Reader in Sexuality. Comp. Mandy Merck. Routledge, New York, pp. 301-11 (orig. pub. in Screen vol. 25, no.1, Winter 1984: 18-28).
67. Lancaster, K. (2001). Interacting with Babylon 5: Fan Performances in a Media Universe. University of Texas Press, Austin.
68. Larbalestier, J. (2002). Buffy's Mary Sue is Jonathan: Buffy Acknowledges the Fans. In Wilcox, R. and Lavery, D. (eds.) Fighting the Forces: What's at Stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Rowman Littlefield, New York, pp. 227-38.
69. LeGuern, P. (2004). Toward a Constructivist Approach to Media Cults. In Gwenllian-Jones, S. and Pearson, R. (eds.) Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3-25.
70. Murphy, D. (2006). "Almost Two-thirds of US Homes Have an Online Computer." www.insiderreporst.com/storypage.asp_Q_ChanID_E_HU_ A_StoryID_E_20012775. Accessed March 8, 2006.
71. Pullen, K. (2000). I-love-Xena.com: Creating Online Fan Communities. In Gauntlett, D. (ed.) Web.Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 52-61.
72. Radway, J. (1984). Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
73. Ross, S. (2002). Super (Natural) Women: Female Heroes, Their Friends, and Their Fans. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
74. Rust, L. (2003). Welcome to the House of Fun: Buffy Fanfiction as a Hall of Mirrors. Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media 2 (March) available at www.refractory.unimelb.edu.au/journalissues/vol2/lindarust.html. Accessed March 8, 2006.
75. Staiger, J. (2000). Writing the History of American Film Reception. In Perverse Spectators: The Practices of Film Reception. New York University Press, New York, pp. 43-57.
76. Wen, H. (1999). "Buffy Fans Distribute Postponed Finale Online." (May 28th) available at www.archivesalon.com/tech/log/1999/05/28/buffy_tapes/. Accessed March 8, 2006.
77. Zweerink, A. and Gatson, S. (2004). Interpersonal Culture on the Internet:Television, the Internet, and the Making of a Community. Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, NY.
78. Anderson, C. (2006). People Power. Wired (July), p. 137.
79. Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
80. Baym, N. (2000). Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
81. Baym, N. (1998). Talking About Soaps: Communicative Practices in a Computer-Mediated Fan Culture. In Harris, C. and Alexander, A. (eds.) Theorizing Fandom: Fans, Subculture and Identity. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, pp. 111-29.
82. Becker, A. (2006a) CNN Enlists Citizen Journalists. Broadcasting and Cable (July 31). www.broadcastingcable.com/. Accessed August 1, 2006.
83. Becker, A. (2006b) TV's New Greenhouse. Broadcasting and Cable (August 21). www.broadcastingcable.com/. Accessed August 25, 2006.
84. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
85. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
86. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
87. Carter, B. (2006). Desperate Networks. Doubleday, New York.
88. Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. Routledge, New York.
89. Creamer, M. (2006). Interpublic Opens Consumer-Focused Unit. AdAge (February 24). www.adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=48651. Accessed July 19, 2006.
90. Dayan, D. and Katz, E. (1992). Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
91. De Moraes, L. (2006). Survey Gives "Idol" a Vote of Confidence. Chicago Tribune, section 5, p. 12 (Thursday, May 4) (reprinted with permission from the Washington Post).
92. Ellis, J. (2004). Television Production. In Allen, R. and Hill, A. (eds.) The Television Studies Reader. Routledge, New York, pp. 275-92.
93. Ellis, J. (2000). Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty. I. B. Tauris, New York.
94. Fiske, J. (1992). Cultural Economy of Fandom. In L. Lewis (ed.) The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. Routledge, New York, pp. 30-49.
95. Gledhill, C. (1988). Pleasurable Negotiations. In Pribram, E. D. (ed.) Female Spectators: Looking at Film and Television. Verso, London, pp. 64-89.
96. Gray, J. (2005). Antifandom and the Moral Text: Television Without Pity and Textual Dislike. American Behavioral Science 48, issue 7 (March 1): 840.
97. Gripsrud, J. (2004). Broadcast Television: The Chances of Its Survival in a Digital Age. In Spigel, L. and Olsson, J. (eds.) Television After TV:Essays on a Media in Transition. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 210-23.
98. Hartley, J. (2004). Democratainment. In Allen, R. and Hill, A. (eds.) The Television Studies Reader. Routledge, New York, pp. 524-33.
99. Hayward, J. (1997). Consuming Pleasures: Active Audiences and Serial Fictions from Dickens to Soap Opera. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington.
100. Heinricy, S., Payne, M. and McManaman, A. (2005). Pass the Remote: Adult Swim. FLOW: A Critical Forum on Television and Media 2 (issue 2). www.jot.communication.utexas.edu/flow/?jot=view&id=700.
101. Hill, A. (2005). Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television. Routledge, New York.
102. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press, New York.
103. Jenkins, H. (2002). Interactive Audience? In Harries, D. (ed.) The New Media Book. BFI, London, pp. 157-70.
104. Johnson, D. (2007). Inviting Audiences In: The Spatial Reorganization of Production and Consumption in "TV III." New Review of Film and Television Studies 5, no. 1 (April): 61-80.
105. Kehaulani, S. (2006). NBC Taps Popularity of Online Video Site. Washington Post (June 28), D1.
106. Keveney, B. (2006). "Idol" Contest is a Numbers Game, Too. USAToday.com (May 22). www.usatoday.printthis.clickability.com. Accessed June 27, 2006.
107. Kirsner, S. (2006). Low-budget Viral Videos Attract TV-sized Audiences. Boston Globe (July 30). www.boston.com/business/personaltech/articles/2006/07/30/low_budget_viral-video. Accessed July 31, 2006.
108. Koerner, S. (2005a) Insight from the Inside Out. The Hub (May 2), 10-13. www.hubmagazine.com/?p=26. Accessed July 19, 2006.
109. Koerner, S. (2005b) Listening to Fan Voices. Family Friendly Programming Forum, presentation.
110. Lafayette, J. (2006). Net Brings Licensing In-House. Television Week 25, 9 (February 27), 3.
111. Lauer, K. (2006). Web Sites Adding to "Idol" Craziness. Allentown, PA Morning Call (May 13). www.tmcnet.com/scripts. Accessed July 5, 2006.
112. Learmonth, M. (2006). New York TV Fest Gives Pitchers Their Chance. Variety (July 16). www.variety.com/7/19/06. Accessed July 19, 2006.
113. Littlejohn, J. (2006). Surprise! Current TV is Generating Electricity. Chicago Tribune Online Edition (July 31). www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/tv/chi. Accessed July 31, 2006.
114. Mittell, J. (2004). Genre and Television: From Cop Shows to Cartoons in American Culture. Routledge, New York.
115. Neuman, W. R. (1991). The Future of the Mass Audience. Cambridge University Press, New York.
116. Newcomb, H. (1974). TV: The Most Popular Art. Anchor Press, Garden City, NJ.
117. Nightingale, V. (1996). Studying Audiences: The Shock of the Real. Routledge, New York.
118. Price water house Coopers (2006) The Rise of Lifestyle Media: Achieving Success in the Digital Convergence Era.
119. Reiss, S. and Wiltz, J. (2004). Fascination with Fame Attracts Reality TV Viewers. In Balkin, K. (ed.) Reality TV. Greenhaven Press, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 25-7 (orig. pub. 2001).
120. Reuters (2007). American Idol Finale Audience off from Last Year (May 24). www.reuters.com/article/televisionNews/idUSN2436759820070524. Accessed August 13, 2007.
121. Reuters (2006). Gore Wants TV to Welcome More Users Internet-Style. New York Times.com (August 27). www.nytimes.com/reuters/washington/politics-media-gore-tv.html. Accessed September 1, 2006.
122. Sanderson, P. (2004). Adult Swim Upfront 2004 (April 1). www.filmforce.ign. com/articles/503/503483pl.html. Accessed July 19, 2006.
123. Sandler, K. (2003). Synergy Nirvana: Brand Equity, Television Animation, and Cartoon Network. In Stabile, C. and Harrison, M. (eds.) Prime Time Animation: Television Animation and American Culture. Routledge, New York, pp. 89-109.
124. Stallybrass, P. and White, A. (1986). The Poetics and Politics of Transgression. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
125. Vascellaro, J. (2006). Making a Buck Off Your Pet-Trick Videos. Wall Street Journal Online (July 12). www.onlinewsj.com/public/article_print. Accessed July 19, 2006.
126. Baym, N. (2000). Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
127. Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations. Ed. H. Arendt, trans. H. Zohn. Schocken Books, New York (orig. pub. 1955).
128. Boyd, D. (forthcoming) Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. In Buckingham, D. (ed.) MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning, Identity Volume. MIT Press, Boston. www.danah.org/papers/. Accessed July 8, 2007.
129. Brown, L. (1998). Raising Their Voices: The Politics of Girls' Anger. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
130. Bury, R. (2005). Cyberspaces of Their Own: Female Fandom Online. Peter Lang, New York.
131. Carlip, H. (1995). Girl Power. Warner Books, New York.
132. Chandross, N. (2005). "Degrassi" Becomes A Cult Hit Depicting Violence and Heartaches. ABCnews.com (October 18). www.abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=1199990&page=1. Accessed October 9, 2006.
133. Clark, L. S. (2005). The Constant Contact Generation: Exploring Teen Friendship Networks Online. In Mazzarella, S. (ed.) Girl Wide Web: Girls, the Internet, and the Negotiation of Identity. Peter Lang, New York, pp. 203-21.
134. Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. Routledge, New York.
135. Elber, L. (2006). New Marketing Model for New CW Network. Washington post. com (September 18). www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/18. Accessed September 19, 2006.
136. Everett, A. (2002). Digitextuality and Click Theory: Theses on Convergence Media in the Digital Age. In Harries, D. (ed.) The New Media Book. BFI, London, pp. 3-28.
137. Gillespie, T. (2002). The Stories Digital Tools Tell. In Harries, D. (ed.) The New Media Book. BFI, London, pp. 107-23.
138. Gilligan, C. (1982). In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
139. Goldfarb, J. (2006). MTV Bringing Social Networking to TV Channel (July 24). www.news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060724/tv_nm/media_mtv_flux.
140. Hayward, J. (1997). Consuming Pleasures: Active Audiences and Serial Fictions from Dickens to Soap Opera. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington.
141. Hibberd, J. (2006). CW's Ratings Keep Affiliates Happy. Television Week 25, no. 44 (November 27), p. 45.
142. Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. Routledge, New York.
143. Hoover, S. et al. (2004). Media, Home, and Family. Routledge, New York.
144. Jayson, S. (2006). Totally Wireless on Campus. USA Today (October 2). www. usatoday.com. Accessed October 9, 2006.
145. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Cultures. Routledge, New York.
146. Jenkins, H. et al. (2006). Executive Summary of "Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century." MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, pp. 1-4.
147. Kronke, D. (2005). Evergreen "Degrassi" (June 29). www.news.degrassi.ca/article.php?a_id=1139. Accessed October 9, 2006.
148. Mazzarella, S. (2005). Introduction: It's a Girl Wide Web. In Mazzarella, S. (ed.) Girl Wide Web: Girls, the Internet, and the Negotiation of Identity. Peter Lang, New York, pp. 1-12.
149. Mittell, J. (2004). Genre and Television: From Cop Shows to Cartoons in American Culture. Routledge, New York.
150. Morley, D. (2004). At Home With Television. Television After TV: Essays on a Media in Transition. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 303-23.
151. Morse, M. (1998). Virtualities: Television, Media Art, and Cyberculture. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis.
152. Nicks, J. (2004). Degrassi. In Newcomb, H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Television. 2nd edn., vol. 2. Fitzroy Dearborn, New York, pp. 675-9.
153. Pipher, M. (2002). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls. Ballantine Books, New York.
154. Price water house Coopers (2006) The Rise of Lifestyle Media: Achieving Success in the Digital Convergence Era.
155. Riddell, R. (2006). MTV2 Cues Up Kudocast with Aud Involvement (June 20). www.clickz.com/news.
156. Ross, S. (2005). Teen Choice Awards: Better Than the Emmys? FLOW:A Critical Forum on Television and Media 3 (issue 1). www.jot.communication. utexas.edu/flow/?jot=view&id=932.
157. Ross, S. and Stein, L. (eds.) (forthcoming) Teen Television: Essays on Programming and Fandom. McFarland, Jefferson, NC.
158. Sandvoss, C. (2005). Fans: The Mirror of Consumption. Polity Press, Cambridge.
159. The O.C. Insider (2006a) Spring 2006 Issue (issue no. 2).
160. The O.C. Insider (2006b) Summer 2006 Music Issue (issue no. 5).
161. Tulloch, J. (1990). Television Drama: Agency, Audience and Myth. Routledge, New York.
162. Turner, V. (1982). From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. Performing Arts Journal Publications, New York.
163. Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine Publishing, Chicago.
164. Turner, V. (1967). The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
165. Bauder, D. (2007). CBS Execs Looking to Hike Buzz Factor. Los Angeles Times (January 18). www.calanderlive.com/tv/sns-ap-tv-cbs-blues.
166. Baym, N. (2000). Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
167. Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations. Ed. H. Arendt, Trans. H. Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, New York (orig. pub. 1955)
168. Brooke-Rose, C. (1983). A Rhetoric of the Unreal: Studies in Narrative and Structure, Especially of the Fantastic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
169. Brooks, T. and Marsh, E. (2003). The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows. Ballantine Books, New York.
170. Brown, E. B. (1992). "What Has Happened Here?" The Politics of Difference in Women's History and Feminist Politics. Feminist Studies 18 (no. 2, summer), 295-312.
171. Bury, R. (2005). Cyberspaces of Their Own: Female Fandom Online. Peter Lang, New York.
172. Carter, B. (2006). Desperate Networks. Doubleday, New York.
173. Fernandez, M. E. (2006b) Island Life. Honolulu Advertiser (March 29). www.thehonoluluadvertiser.com/article/2006/Mar/29/il/FP603290312.html. Accessed October 3, 2006.
174. Fernandez, M. E. (2006a) Television Chicago Tribune (January 5).
175. Gray, J. (2005). Antifandom and the Moral Text: Television Without Pity and Textual Dislike. American Behavioral Science vol. 48 (issue 7, March 1), 840.
176. Gray, J. and Mittell, J. (2007). Speculation on Spoilers: Lost Fandom, Narrative Consumption and Rethinking Textuality. Participations vol. 4 (issue 1, May). www.participations.org/. Accessed July 1, 2007.
177. Jenkins, H. (2007). Transmedia Storytelling 101 (March 22). www.cms.mit. edu/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1103. Accessed July 1, 2007.
178. Jenkins, H. (2006). The Magic of Back-Story: Further Reflections on the Mainstreaming of Fan Culture (December 5). www.cms.mit.edu/mt/mt-tb.cgi/808. Accessed July 1, 2007.
179. Jenkins, H. (2002). Interactive Audience? In Harries, D. (ed.) The New Media Book. BFI, London, pp. 157-70.
180. Johnson, C. (2005). Telefantasy. BFI, London.
181. Mamber, S. (2003). Narrative Mapping. In Everett, A. and Caldwell, J. (eds.) New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality. Routledge, New York, pp. 145-58.
182. Mittell, J. (2006a) Lost in an Alternate Reality. FLOW: A Critical Forum on Television and Media 4 (issue 7). www.jot.communication.utexas.edu/flow/?jot=view&id=1927.
183. Mittell, J. (2006b) Narrative Complexity in Contemporary American Television. The Velvet Light Trap (no. 58, fall), 29-40.
184. New York Times (2006). Running the Really Big Show: Lost Inc. (October 1). NYTimes.com. Accessed October 3, 2006.
185. Ross, S. (2002). Super (Natural) Women: Female Heroes, Their Friends, and Their Fans. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
186. Snierson, D. (2004). Almost Paradise... Lost. Entertainment Weekly, 795 (December 3), pp. 30-6.
187. Teish, L. (1985). Jambalaya: The Natural Woman's Book of pPersonal Charms and Practical Rituals. Harper and Row, San Francisco.
188. Thompson, K. (2003). Storytelling in Film and Television. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
189. Todorov, T. (1975) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Trans. R. Howard. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY (orig. pub. 1973).
190. Veitch, K. (2005). Lost in the Moment. USA Weekend (May 8). www.usaweekend.com/05_issues/050508/050508tv_lost.html. Accessed October 3, 2006.
191. Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
192. Beatrice, A. (2005). Save FireFly.
193. Online work-in-progress from forthcoming book (2007) Will the Vampire People Please Leave the Lobby? True Adventures in Internet Geekdom. Sourcebooks, Naperville, IL. Available at www.allysonbeatrice.com/firefly.html. Accessed February 23, 2007.
194. Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations. Ed. H. Arendt, trans. H. Zohn. Schocken Books, New York (orig. pub. 1955).
195. Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. Routledge, New York.
196. Code, L. (1991). What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
197. Higgins, J. (2006). Nielsen-Follow the Video. Broadcasting and Cable (June 19). www.broadcastingcable.com.
198. Hills, M. (2002). Fan Cultures. Routledge, New York.
199. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. NYU Press, New York.
200. Jenkins, H. (2002). Interactive Audience? In Harries, D. (ed.) The New Media Book. BFI, London, pp. 157-70.
201. Koerner, S. (2005). Listening to Fan Voices. Family Friendly Programming Forum, presentation.
202. Marshall, P. (2002). The New Intertextual Commodity. In Harries, D. (ed.) The New Media Book. BFI, London, pp. 69-81.
203. Maxwell, A. (2006). The New Prime Time. Home Theater (June), pp. 36-44.
204. Reiss, S. and Wiltz, J. (2004). Fascination with Fame Attracts Reality TV Viewers. In Balkin, K. (ed.) Reality TV. Greenhaven Press, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 25-7 (orig. pub. 2001).
205. Shields, M. (2007). CBS: Serious Web Users Bond With Prime-Time Shows. MediaWeek.com (January 4). www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003528040. Accessed January 5, 2007.