Verbal Expressions of Uncertainty and Probability

Thinking: Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning, Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 123-145

  Teigen, Karl Halvor ^a   Brun, Wibecke ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Numeric probabilities; Probabilistic reasoning; Verbal probability expressions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889393685     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/047001332X.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Amer, T., Hackenbrack, K. & Nelson, M. (1994). Between-auditor differences in the interpretation of probability phrases. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13, 126-136.
2. Beyth-Marom, R. (1982). How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Forecasting, 1, 257-269.
3. Black, M. (1937). Vagueness: An exercise in logical analysis. Philosophy of Science, 4, 427-455.
4. Reprinted in M. Black (1949), Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5. Bohner, G., Bless, H., Schwartz, N.&Strack, F. (1988). What triggers causal attributions? The impact of valence and subjective probability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 335-345.
6. Brun, W. & Teigen, K. H. (1988). Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 390-404.
7. Bryant, G. D.&Norman, G. R. (1980). Expressions of probability:Words and numbers. New England Journal of Medicine, 302, 411.
8. Budescu, D. V. & Wallsten, T. S. (1985). Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 391-405.
9. Budescu, D. V. & Wallsten, T. S. (1990). Dyadic decisions with verbal and numerical probabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 240-263.
10. Budescu, D. V. & Wallsten, T. S. (1995). Processing linguistic probabilities: General principles and empirical evidence. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 32, 275-318.
11. Budescu, D. V., Karelitz, T. & Wallsten, T. S. (2000). Predicting the directionality of probability words from their membership functions. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society, 41st Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
12. Clark, D. A. (1990). Verbal uncertainty expressions: A review of two decades of research. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 9, 203-235.
13. Clark, H. H.&Clark, E.V. (1977). The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
14. Clarke, V. A., Ruffin, C. L., Hill, D. J. & Beamen, A. L. (1992). Ratings of orally presented verbal expressions of probability by a heterogeneous sample. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 638-656.
15. Cliff, N. (1959). Adverbs as multipliers. Psychological Review, 66, 27-44.
16. Cohen, B. L.&Wallsten, T. S. (1992). The effect of constant outcome value on judgments and decision making given linguistic probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 53-72.
17. Davidson, R. A. (1991). Practical difficulties encountered in selecting uncertaintywords: The example of accounting standards. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40, 353-363.
18. Denes-Raj, V. & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819-829.
19. Erev, I. & Cohen, B. L. (1990). Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 1-18.
20. Fillenbaum, S., Wallsten, T. S., Cohen, B. L. & Cox, J. A. (1991). Some effects of vocabulary and communication task on the understanding and use of vague probability expressions. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 35-60.
21. González-Vallejo, C. C. &Wallsten, T. S. (1992). Effects of probability mode on preference reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 855-864.
22. González-Vallejo, C. C., Erev, I. & Wallsten, T. S. (1994). Do decision quality and preference order depend on whether probabilities are verbal or numerical? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 157-172.
23. Hacking, I. (1975). The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hamm, R. M. (1991). Selection of verbal probabilities: A solution for some problems of verbal probability expression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 193-223.
25. Hertwig, R. & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The "conjunction fallacy" revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 275-305.
26. Horn, L. (1989). A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11, 143-157.
28. Karelitz, T., Budescu, D. & Wallsten, T. (2000). Validation of a new technique for eliciting membership functions of probability phrases. Poster presented at the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
29. Kong, A., Barnett, G. O., Mosteller, F. & Youtz, C. (1986). How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. New England Journal of Medicine, 315, 740-744.
30. Levin, P., Schneider, S. L. & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
31. Lichtenstein, S. & Newman, J. R. (1967). Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities. Psychonomic Science, 9, 563-564.
32. McGlone, M. S. & Reed, A. B. (1998). Anchoring in the interpretation of probability expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 723-733.
33. Moxey, L. M. & Sanford, A. J. (1987). Quantifiers and focus. Journal of Semantics, 5, 189-206.
34. Moxey, L. M. & Sanford, A. J. (1993). Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.
35. Moxey, L. M. & Sanford, A. J. (2000). Communicating quantities: A review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 237-255.
36. Mullet, E. & Rivet, I. (1991). Comprehension of verbal probability expressions in children and adolescents. Language and Communication, 11, 217-225.
37. Nakao, M. A. & Axelrod, S. (1983). Numbers are better than words. American Journal of Medicine, 74, 1061-1063.
38. Olson, M. J. & Budescu, D. V. (1997). Patterns of preferences for numerical and verbal probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 117-131.
39. Reagan, R. T., Mosteller, F. & Youtz, C. (1989). Quantifying meanings of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 433-442.
40. Renooij, S. & Witteman, C. (1999). Talking probabilities: Communicating probabilistic information with words and numbers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 22, 169-194.
41. Reyna, V. F. (1981). The language of possibility and probability: Effects of negation on meaning. Memory and Cognition, 9, 642-650.
42. Russell, B. A. W. (1923). Vagueness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 84-92.
43. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Posavac, S. S.&Stasney, R. (1997). The subjective beliefs underlying probability overestimation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 276-295.
44. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
45. Sutherland, H. J., Lockwood, G. A., Tritchler, D. L., Sem, F., Brooks, L. & Till, J. E. (1991). Communicating probabilistic information to cancer patients: Is there "noise" on the line? Social Science and Medicine, 32, 725-731.
46. Tavana, M., Kennedy, D. T. & Mohebbi, B. (1997). An applied study using the analytic hierarchy process to translate common verbal phrases to numerical probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 133-150.
47. Teigen, K. H. (1988a). When are low-probability events judged to be "probable"? Effects of outcomeset characteristics on verbal probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 67, 157-174.
48. Teigen, K. H. (1988b). The language of uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 68, 27-38.
49. Teigen, K. H. (1994).Variants of subjective probabilities: Concepts, norms, and biases. In G. Wright& P. Ayton (eds), Subjective Probability (pp. 211-238). London: Wiley.
50. Teigen, K. H. (2000). When equal chances = good chances. Verbal probabilities and the equiprobability effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 77-108.
51. Teigen, K. H. & Brun, W. (1995). Yes, but it is uncertain: Direction and communicative intention of verbal probabilistic terms. Acta Psychologica, 88, 233-258.
52. Teigen, K. H. & Brun, W. (1999). The directionality of verbal probability expressions: Effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 155-190.
53. Teigen, K. H. & Brun, W. (2000). Ambiguous probabilities: When does p = 0.3 reflect a possibility, and when does it reflect a doubt? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 345-362.
54. Teigen, K. H. & Brun, W. (2003). Verbal probabilities: A question of frame? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 53-72.
55. Trinkaus, J. (1989). How business students and faculty quantify probability expressions: Another look. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 97-98.
56. Tversky, A.&Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
57. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probabilistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
58. Wallsten, T., Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., Zwick, R. & Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 115, 348-365.
59. Wallsten,T.S., Fillenbaum, S.&Cox, J. A. (1986). Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 571-587.
60. Wason, P. C. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 7-11.
61. Weber, E. U. & Hilton, D. J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretation of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 781-789.
62. Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. London: Routledge.
63. Windschitl, P. D. (2000). The binary additivity of subjective probability does not indicate the binary complementarity of perceived certainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 195-225.
64. Windschitl, P. D. &Wells, G. L. (1996). Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 343-364.
65. Windschitl, P. D. & Wells, G. L. (1998). The alternative-outcomes effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1411-1423.