Assessment of intracranial dynamics in hydrocephalus: Effects of viscoelasticity on the outcome of infusion tests: Laboratory investigation

Journal of Neurosurgery

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1511-1519

  Bottan, Simone ^a   Daners, Marianne Schmid ^a   De Zelicourt, Diane ^b   Fellner, Norina ^a   Poulikakos, Dimos ^a   Kurtcuoglu, Vartan ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bolus infusion; Constant flow infusion; Constant pressure infusion; Hydrocephalus; Intracranial pressure; Phantom model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOW RATE; HYDROCEPHALUS; INFUSION RATE; PHANTOM; PRESSURE; PRESSURE VOLUME CURVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 84889250142     PISSN: 00223085     EISSN: 19330693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS122497     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Avezaat CJJ, van Eijndhoven JHM: Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and craniospinal dynamics. A theoretical, clinical and experimental study [doctoral thesis]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University, 1984
2. Bergsneider M: Hydrocephalus: new theories and new shunts? Clin Neurosurg 52:120-126, 2005
3. Bottan S, Poulikakos D, Kurtcuoglu V: Phantom model of physiologic intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:1532-1538, 2012
4. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PHM, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM, Paas MHJW, van Bree JLMJ: Comparison of the dynamic behaviour of brain tissue and two model materials. Presented at the 43rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, Warrendale, PA, 1999 (Abstract) (http://papers.sae.org/99SC21/) [Accessed August 6, 2013]
5. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Momjian S, Pickard JD: Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Physiol Meas 25:R51-R76, 2004
6. Eklund A, Smielewski P, Chambers I, Alperin N, Malm J, Czosnyka M, et al: Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance. Med Biol Eng Comput 45:719-735, 2007
7. Ekstedt J: CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:105-119, 1977
8. Elkin BS, Ilankovan AI, Morrison B III: A detailed viscoelastic characterization of the P17 and adult rat brain. J Neurotrauma 28:2235-2244, 2011
9. Freimann FB, Streitberger KJ, Klatt D, Lin K, McLaughlin J, Braun J, et al: Alteration of brain viscoelasticity after shunt treatment in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 54:189-196, 2012
10. Fridén HG, Ekstedt J: Volume/pressure relationship of the cerebrospinal space in humans. Neurosurgery 13:351-366, 1983
11. Fung YC: Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer, 1993
12. Gallia GL, Rigamonti D, Williams MA: The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2:375-381, 2006
13. Green MA, Bilston LE, Sinkus R: In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed 21:755-764, 2008
14. Guirao B, Meunier A, Mortaud S, Aguilar A, Corsi JM, Strehl L, et al: Coupling between hydrodynamic forces and planar cell polarity orients mammalian motile cilia. Nat Cell Biol 12:341-350, 2010
15. Gupta S, Soellinger M, Boesiger P, Poulikakos D, Kurtcuoglu V: Three-dimensional computational modeling of subjectspecific cerebrospinal fluid flow in the subarachnoid space. J Biomech Eng 131:021010-1-021010-11, 2009
16. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, et al: A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid â. Sci Transl Med 4:147ra111, 2012
17. Kasprowicz M, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Momjian S, Smielewski P, Juniewicz H, et al: Hysteresis of the cerebrospinal pressure-volume curve in hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 86:529-532, 2003
18. Kruse SA, Rose GH, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Felmlee JP, Jack CR Jr, et al: Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Neuroimage 39:231-237, 2008
19. Kurtcuoglu V, Soellinger M, Summers P, Boomsma K, Poulikakos D, Boesiger P, et al: Computational investigation of subject-specific cerebrospinal fluid flow in the third ventricle and aqueduct of Sylvius. J Biomech 40:1235-1245, 2007
20. Laksari K, Shafieian M, Darvish K: Constitutive model for brain tissue under finite compression. J Biomech 45:642-646, 2012
21. Ma J, Wittek A, Singh S, Joldes G, Washio T, Chinzei K, et al: Evaluation of accuracy of non-linear finite element computations for surgical simulation: study using brain phantom. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 13:783-794, 2010
22. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black PM: The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57:S17-S28, 2005
23. Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM: A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48:332-344, 1978
24. Miller K, Chinzei K: Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. J Biomech 35:483-490, 2002
25. Rekate HL: A consensus on the classification of hydrocephalus: its utility in the assessment of abnormalities of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Childs Nerv Syst 27:1535-1541, 2011
26. Sack I, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, Klatt D, Braun J: Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed 21:265-271, 2008
27. Sawamoto K, Wichterle H, Gonzalez-Perez O, Cholfin JA, Yamada M, Spassky N, et al: New neurons follow the flow of cerebrospinal fluid in the adult brain. Science 311:629-632, 2006
28. Schmid Daners M, Bottan S, Guzzella L, Poulikakos D, Kurtcuoglu V: Craniospinal pressure-volume dynamics in phantom models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:3482-3490, 2012
29. Streitberger KJ, Sack I, Krefting D, Pfüller C, Braun J, Paul F, et al: Brain viscoelasticity alteration in chronic-progressive multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 7:e29888, 2012
30. Sundström N, Andersson K, Marmarou A, Malm J, Eklund A: Comparison between 3 infusion methods to measure cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 113:1294-1303, 2010
31. Sweetman B, Linninger AA: Cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics in the central nervous system. Ann Biomed Eng 39:484-496, 2011
32. Takeuchi T, Kasahara E, Iwasaki M, Mima T, Mori K: Indications for shunting in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus presenting with dementia and brain atrophy (atypical idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 40:38-47, 2000
33. Wikkelsø C, Hellström P, Klinge PM, Tans JT: The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF Tap Test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:562-568, 2013