Direct comparison of laser Doppler flowmetry and laser Doppler imaging for assessment of experimentally-induced inflammation in human skin

Inflammation Research

Volumn 62, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1073-1078

  Petersen, Lars J ^a,b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Dose response relation; Human; Inflammation; Laser Doppler flowmetry; Laser Doppler imaging; Reproducibility; Skin irritants; Sodium lauryl sulfate

Indexed keywords

DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMATITIS; DOPPLER FLOWMETER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; LASER DOPPLER IMAGING; MALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN BLOOD FLOW; SKIN MANIFESTATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; MALE; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SKIN; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84889085498     PISSN: 10233830     EISSN: 1420908X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00011-013-0668-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Engelhart M, Petersen LJ, Kristensen JK. The local regulation of blood flow evaluated simultaneously by 133-xenon washout and laser Doppler flowmetry. J Invest Dermatol. 1988;91:451-3.
2. Cracowski JL, Minson CT, Salvat-Melis M, Halliwill JR. Methodological issues in the assessment of skin microvascular endothelial function in humans. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006;27:503-8.
3. Roustit M, Blaise S, Millet C, Cracowski JL. Reproducibility and methodological issues of skin post-occlusive and thermal hyperemia assessed by single-point laser Doppler flowmetry. Microvasc Res. 2010;79:102-8.
4. Tew GA, Klonizakis M, Crank H, Briers JD, Hodges GJ. Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler for assessing microvascular function. Microvasc Res. 2011;82:326-32.
5. Clough GF, Bennett AR, Church MK. Effects of H1 antagonists on the cutaneous vascular response to histamine and bradykinin: a study using scanning laser Doppler imaging. Br J Dermatol. 1998;138:806-14.
6. Bray R, Forrester K, Leonard C, McArthur R, Tulip J, Lindsay R. Laser Doppler imaging of burn scars: a comparison of wavelength and scanning methods. Burns. 2003;29:199-206.
7. Opazo Saez AM, Mosel F, Nurnberger J, Rushentsova U, Gossl M, Mitchell A, Schafers RF, Philipp T, Wenzel RR. Laser Doppler imager (LDI) scanner and intradermal injection for in vivo pharmacology in human skin microcirculation: responses to acetylcholine, endothelin-1 and their repeatability. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59:511-9.
8. Fluhr JW, Kuss O, Diepgen T, Lazzerini S, Pelosi A, Gloor M, Berardesca E. Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145:696-703.
9. Kernick DP, Shore AC. Characteristics of laser Doppler perfusion imaging in vitro and in vivo. Physiol Meas. 2000;21:333-40.
10. Klonizakis M, Manning G, Donnelly R. Assessment of lower limb microcirculation: exploring the reproducibility and clinical application of laser Doppler techniques. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24:136-43.
11. Roustit M, Millet C, Blaise S, Dufournet B, Cracowski JL. Excellent reproducibility of laser speckle contrast imaging to assess skin microvascular reactivity. Microvasc Res. 2010;80:505-11.
12. Seifalian AM, Stansby G, Jackson A, Howell K, Hamilton G. Comparison of laser Doppler perfusion imaging, laser Doppler flowmetry, and thermographic imaging for assessment of blood flow in human skin. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1994;8:65-9.
13. Broby-Johansen U, Karlsmark T, Petersen LJ, Serup J. Ranking of the antipsoriatic effect of various topical corticosteroids applied under a hydrocolloid dressing - skin-thickness, blood-flow and colour measurements compared to clinical assessments. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990;15:343-8.
14. Henricson J, Tesselaar E, Persson K, Nilsson G, Sjoberg F. Assessment of microvascular function by study of the dose-response effects of iontophoretically applied drugs (acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside) - methods and comparison with in vitro studies. Microvasc Res. 2007;73:143-9.
15. Leahy MJ, Enfield JG, Clancy NT, O'Doherty J, McNamara P, Nilsson GE. Biophotonic methods in microcirculation imaging. Med Laser Appl. 2007;22:105-26.
16. Tupker RA, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee CH, Fartasch M, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests: a report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermat. 1997;37:53-69.
17. Petersen LJ, Lyngholm AM, Arendt-Nielsen L. A novel model of inflammatory pain in human skin involving topical application of sodium lauryl sulfate. Inflamm Res. 2010;59:775-81.
18. Fullerton A, Stucker M, Wilhelm KP, Wardell K, Anderson C, Fischer T, Nilsson GE, Serup J. Guidelines for visualization of cutaneous blood flow by laser Doppler perfusion imaging: a report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis based upon the HIRELADO European community project. Contact Dermat. 2002;46:129-40.
19. Petersen LJ, Church MK, Skov PS. Histamine is released in the wheal but not the flare following challenge of human skin in vivo: a microdialysis study. Clin Exp Allergy. 1997;27:284-95.
20. Petersen LJ, Zacho HD, Lyngholm AM, Arendt-Nielsen L. Tissue viability imaging for assessment of pharmacologically induced vasodilation and vasoconstriction in human skin. Microvasc Res. 2010;80:499-504.
21. O'Doherty J, McNamara P, Clancy NT, Enfield JG, Leahy MJ. Comparison of instruments for investigation of microcirculatory blood flow and red blood cell concentration. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14:034025.
22. Staberg B, Serup J. Allergic and irritant skin reactions evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry. Contact Dermat. 1988;18:40-5.
23. Goon AT, Leow YH, Chan YH, Goh CL. Correlation between laser Doppler perfusion imaging and visual scoring of patch test sites in subjects with experimentally induced allergic and irritant contact reactions. Skin Res Technol. 2004;10:64-6.
24. Fullerton A, Rode B, Serup J. Skin irritation typing and grading based on laser Doppler perfusion imaging. Skin Res Technol. 2002;8:23-31.
25. Farnebo S, Zettersten EK, Samuelsson A, Tesselaar E, Sjoberg F. Assessment of blood flow changes in human skin by microdialysis urea clearance. Microcirculation. 2011;18:198-204.
26. Roustit M, Maggi F, Isnard S, Hellmann M, Bakken B, Cracowski JL. Reproducibility of a local cooling test to assess microvascular function in human skin. Microvasc Res. 2010;79:34-9.
27. Bircher A, de Boer EM, Agner T, Wahlberg JE, Serup J. Guidelines for measurement of cutaneous blood flow by laser Doppler flowmetry: a report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermat. 1994;30:65-72.
28. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-60.
29. Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1-15.