Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler for assessing microvascular function

Microvascular Research

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 326-332

  Tew, Garry A ^a   Klonizakis, Markos ^a   Crank, Helen ^a   Briers, J David ^b   Hodges, Gary J ^c  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLD PRESSOR TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOREARM BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; LASER SPECKLE CONTRAST IMAGING; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MICROVASCULARIZATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKIN BLOOD FLOW; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; SYMPATHETIC REFLEX; VASOMOTOR REFLEX;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COLD TEMPERATURE; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FINGERS; FOREARM; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; INHALATION; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MICROVESSELS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REFLEX; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKIN; SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 81055157019     PISSN: 00262862     EISSN: 10959319     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2011.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Asahina M., et al. Measurements of sweat response and skin vasomotor reflex for assessment of autonomic dysfunction in patients with diabetes. J. Diabetes Complications 2008, 22:278-283.
2. Aso Y., et al. Evaluation of skin vasomotor reflexes in response to deep inspiration in diabetic patients by laser Doppler flowmetry. A new approach to the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1997, 20:1324-1328.
3. Bandyopadhyay R., et al. Speckle-visibility spectroscopy: a tool to study time-varying dynamics. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2005, 76:093110.
4. Boas D.A., Dunn A.K. Laser speckle contrast imaging in biomedical optics. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010, 15:011109.
5. Bonner R., Nossal R. Model for laser Doppler measurements of blood-flow in tissue. Appl. Opt. 1981, 20:2097-2107.
6. Bornmyr S., et al. Detection of autonomic sympathetic dysfunction in diabetic patients. A study using laser Doppler imaging. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:593-597.
7. Bornmyr S., et al. Cutaneous vasomotor responses in young type I diabetic patients. J. Diabetes Complications 1997, 11:21-26.
8. Briers J.D. Statistics of fluctuating speckle patterns produced by a mixture of moving and stationary scatterers. Opt. Quantum Electron. 1978, 10:364-366.
9. Briers J.D. Laser Doppler and time-varying speckle: a reconciliation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1996, 13:345-350.
10. Briers J.D. Laser speckle contrast imaging for measuring blood flow. Optica Applicata 2007, 37:139-152.
11. Briers J.D., Webster S. Quasi real-time digital version of single-exposure speckle photography for full-field monitoring of velocity or flow-fields. Opt. Commun. 1995, 116:36-42.
12. Cracowski J.L., et al. Methodological issues in the assessment of skin microvascular endothelial function in humans. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27:503-508.
13. Draijer M., et al. Review of laser speckle contrast techniques for visualizing tissue perfusion. Las. Med. Sci. 2009, 24:639-651.
14. Fercher A.F., Briers J.D. Flow visualization by means of single-exposure speckle photography. Opt. Commun. 1981, 37:326-330.
15. Glüer C.C., et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos. Int. 1995, 5:262-270.
16. Johnson J.M., et al. Laser-Doppler measurement of skin blood flow: comparison with plethysmography. J. Appl. Physiol. 1984, 56:798-803.
17. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
18. Mahe G., et al. Laser speckle contrast imaging accurately measures blood flow over moving skin surfaces. Microvasc. Res. 2011, 81:183-188.
19. Nukada H., et al. Preservation of skin vasoconstrictor responses in chronic atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Angiology 1998, 49:181-188.
20. O'Doherty J., et al. Comparison of instruments for investigation of microcirculatory blood flow and red blood cell concentration. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14:034025.
21. Parthasarathy A.B., et al. Robust flow measurement with multi-exposure speckle imaging. Opt. Express 2008, 16:1975-1989.
22. Rabal H.J., et al. Numerical model for dynamic speckle: an approach using the movement of the scatterers. J. Opt. A-Pure Appl. Opt. 2003, 5:S381-S385.
23. Ramirez-San-Juan J.C., et al. Impact of velocity distribution assumption on simplified laser speckle imaging equation. Opt. Express 2008, 16:3197-3203.
24. Rossi M., et al. Blunted post-ischemic increase of the endothelial skin blood flowmotion component as early sign of endothelial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease patients. Microvasc. Res. 2008, 75:315-322.
25. Rousseau P., et al. Increasing the "region of interest" and "time of interest", both reduce the variability of blood flow measurements using laser speckle contrast imaging. Microvasc. Res. 2011.
26. Roustit M., et al. Reproducibility and methodological issues of skin post-occlusive and thermal hyperemia assessed by single-point laser Doppler flowmetry. Microvasc. Res. 2010, 79:102-108.
27. Roustit M., et al. Excellent reproducibility of laser speckle contrast imaging to assess skin microvascular reactivity. Microvasc. Res. 2010, 80:505-511.
28. Tew G.A., et al. Reproducibility of cutaneous thermal hyperaemia assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry in young and older adults. Microvasc. Res. 2011, 81:177-182.
29. Thompson O.B., Andrews M.K. Tissue perfusion measurements: multiple-exposure laser speckle analysis generates laser Doppler-like spectra. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010, 15:027015.
30. Wahlberg E., Fagrell B. Spatial and temporal variation in laser Doppler flux values in healthy lower limbs: comparison between the standard and the multiprobe. Int. J. Microcirc. Clin. Exp. 1994, 14:343-346.
31. Wardell K., et al. Spatial heterogeneity in normal skin perfusion recorded with laser Doppler imaging and flowmetry. Microvasc. Res. 1994, 48:26-38.
32. Yamamoto-Suganuma R., Aso Y. Relationship between post-occlusive forearm skin reactive hyperaemia and vascular disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes-a novel index for detecting micro- and macrovascular dysfunction using laser Doppler flowmetry. Diabetic Med. 2009, 26:83-88.
33. Young T.M., et al. Skin vasomotor reflex responses in two contrasting groups of autonomic failure: multiple system atrophy and pure autonomic failure. J. Neurol. 2006, 253:846-850.