Methodological innovation and research ethics: Forces in tension or forces in harmony?

Qualitative Research

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 650-667

  Nind, Melanie ^a   Wiles, Rose ^a   Bengry Howell, Andrew ^a   Crow, Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

child led research; creative methods; ethics; methodological innovation; netnography; risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889023468     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: 17413109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468794112455042     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Attride-Stirling J.Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research.Qualitative Research. 2001;1 (3): 385-405.
2. Bassey MCase Study in Educational Settings. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999:.
3. Coffey A.Methodological development and enhancing research capacity.British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2010;31 (3): 367-373.
4. Denzin N.Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs.Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16 (6): 419-427.
5. Dingwall R.The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research.Twenty-First Century Society. 2008;3 (1): 1-12.
6. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2005) Research ethics framework. Available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf (accessed 6 January 2012).
7. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2010a) Framework for research ethics. Available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf (accessed 16 February 2012).
8. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2010b) ESRC impact, innovation and interdisciplinary expectations. Available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding-and-guidance/guidance/applicants/iii.aspx (accessed 23 February 2012).
9. FrankhamJ (2009) Partnership research: a review of approaches and challenges in conducting research in partnership with service users. Discussion Paper. NCRM/013. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/778/1/Frankham_May_09.pdf (accessed 23 February 2012).
10. Gauntlett DCreative Explorations: New Approaches to Identities and Audiences. London: Routledge; 2007:.
11. Hammersley MQuestioning Qualitative Inquiry: Critical Essays. London: Sage; 2008:.
12. Hammersley M.Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation.International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2009;12 (3): 211-226.
13. Hesse-Biber SN,Leavy PHandbook of Emergent Methods. Hesse-Biber SNLeavy P, ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:1-15.
14. Hine CVirtual Ethnography. London: Sage; 2000:.
15. Hine CHandbook of Emergent Methods. Hesse-Biber SNLeavy P, ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:525-541.
16. Iphofen REthical Decision Making in Social Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:.
17. Israel M,Hay IResearch Ethics for Social Scientists. London: Sage; 2006:.
18. Kellett MHow to Develop Children as Researchers: A Step by Step Guide to Teaching the Research Process. London: Sage; 2005:.
19. Kellett MRethinking Children and Research: Attitudes in Contemporary Society. London: Continuum; 2010:.
20. Klein JTInterdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press; 1990:.
21. Kozinets RV.The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities.Journal of Marketing Research. 2002;39:61-72.
22. Kozinets RVNetnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage; 2010:.
23. Kozinets RV.Marketing netnography: prom/ot(ulgat)ing a new research method.Methodological Innovations Online. 2012;7 (1): 37-45.
24. Lincoln YSThe Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2005) Institutional review boards and methodological conservatism: the challenge to and from phenomenological paradigms. In: DenzinNZLincolnYS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 165-181.Denzin NZLincoln YS, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:165-181.
25. Murphy E,Dingwall M.Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice.Social Science & Medicine. 2007;65:2223-2234.
26. Orton-Johnson K.Ethics in online research: evaluating the ESRC framework for research ethics categorisation of risk.Sociological Research Online. 2010;15 (4): 13.
27. PainH (2009) Innovation in qualitative research methodology: annotated bibliography. National Centre for Research Methods working paper. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/811/ (accessed 23 February 2012).
28. Phillips C,Shaw A.Editorial: innovation and the practice of social work research.British Journal of Social Work. 2011;41:609-624.
29. ProsserJLoxleyA (2008) Introducing visual methods. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-010.pdf (accessed 23 February 2012).
30. Rhodes R.Rethinking research ethics.American Journal of Bioethics. 2010;10 (10): 19-36.
31. Richie J,Spencer LAnalysing Qualitative Data. Bryman ABurgess R, ed. London: Routledge; 1994:173-194.
32. Schrag ZMEthical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 2010:.
33. Sikes P,Piper HTalking Truth Confronting Power. Satterthwaite JWatts MPiper H, ed. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books; 2008:51-65.
34. Sikes P,Piper H.Editorial: ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research.International Journal of Research and Method in Education. 2010;33 (3): 205-213.
35. Simons H.The paradox of case study.Cambridge Journal of Education. 1996;26 (2): 225-240.
36. Travers M.New methods, old problems: a sceptical view of methodological innovation in qualitative research.Qualitative Research. 2009;9 (2): 161-179.
37. Van Den Hoonard WCThe Seduction of Ethics: Transforming the Social Sciences. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press; 2011:.
38. Wiles R,Crow G,Pain H.Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review.Qualitative Research. 2011;11 (5): 587-604.
39. Xenitidou M,Gilbert NInnovations in Social Science Research Methods. Guildford: University of Surrey; 2009:.
40. Xenitidou M,Gilbert N.The processes of methodological innovation narrative accounts and reflections.Methodological Innovation Online. 2012;7 (1): 1-6.
41. Yin RKCase Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage; 1989:.