Ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research

International Journal of Research and Method in Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 205-213

  Sikes, Pat ^a   Piper, Heather ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649415315     PISSN: 1743727X     EISSN: 17437288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2010.511838     Document Type: Editorial

References (42)

1. Adler, P., and P. Adler. 1998. Foreword: Moving backward. In Ethnography at the edge: Crime, deviance and field research, ed. J. Ferrell and M. Hamm, xiii-xvi. New Hampshire: North-eastern University Press.
2. Allen, A., K. Anderson, L. Bristol, Y. Downs, D. O'Neill, N. Watts, and Q. Wu. 2009. Resisting the unethical in formalised ethics: Perspectives and experiences. In Power in the academy, ed. J. Satterthwaite, H. Piper, and P. Sikes, 135-52. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
3. Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
4. Bristol, L. 2008. Ethics review committees: A decolonising perspective. Paper presented at the DPR conference, March 18-20, Manchester Metropolitan University.
5. Burgess, R.G. 1984. In the field: An introduction to field research. London: Allen & Unwin.
6. Cannella, G., and Y. Lincoln. 2007. Predatory vs dialogic ethics: Constructing an illusion or ethical practice as the core of research methods. Qualitative Inquiry 13, no. 3: 315-35.
7. Cannella, G., and R. Viruru. 2004. Childhood and postcolonization: Power, education and contemporary practice. New York: Routledge/Falmer.
8. Castell, R. 1999. From dangerousness to risk. In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 281-98. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Department of Health. 2005. Research governance framework: Second edition. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4108962 (accessed July 7, 2010).
10. ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council). 2005. Research ethics framework. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/ESRC_Re_Ethics_Frame_tcm6-11291.pdf (accessed July 7, 2010).
11. Fine, M., L. Weiss, S. Wessen, and L. Wong. 2000. For whom? Qualitative research, representations and social responsibilities. In The handbook of qualitative research, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 2nd ed., 107-31. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. France, A., G. Bendelow, and S. Williams. 2000. A 'risky' business: researching the health beliefs of children and young people. In Researching Children's perspectives, ed. A. Lewis and G. Lindsay, 150-162. Buckingham: Open University.
13. Furedi, F. 2002. The culture of fear: Risk-taking and the morality of low expectation. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
14. Haggarty, K.D. 2004. Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology 27, no. 4: 391-414.
15. Halse, C., and A. Honey. 2007. Rethinking ethics review as institutional discourse. Qualitative Inquiry 13, no. 3: 336-52.
16. Hammersley, M. 2009. Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12, no. 3: 217-18.
17. Humphreys, L. 1970. Tearoom trade: A study of homosexual encounters in public places. London: Duckworth.
18. Israel, M., and I. Hay. 2006. Research ethics for social scientists. London: Sage.
19. Johnson, T.S. 2008a. Qualitative research in question: A narrative of disciplinary power with/in the IRB. Qualitative Inquiry 14, no. 2: 212-32.
20. Johnson, T.S. 2008b. From teacher to lover: Sex scandals in the classroom. New York: Peter Lang.
21. Jones, J. 1981. Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York: Free Press.
22. Kushner, S. 2006. A lament for the ESRC. Research Intelligence 94, February: 9-11.
23. Lincoln, Y. 2005. Institutional Review Boards and methodological conservatism: The challenge to and from phenomenological paradigms. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research: Third edition, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 165-81. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Macfarlane, B. 2009. Researching with integrity: The ethics of academic research. London: Routledge.
25. Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
26. Mitscherliche, A., and F. Mielke. 1947. Doctors of infamy: The story of the Nazi medical crimes. New York: Schuman.
27. Nind, M., J. Rix, K. Sheehy, and K. Simmons, eds. 2005. Ethics and research in inclusive education. London: Routledge/Falmer.
28. Pieterman, R. 2001. Culture in the risk society: An essay on the rise of a precautionary culture. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 22, no. 2: 145-68.
29. Piper, H., and I. Stronach. 2008. Don't touch: The educational story of a panic. London: Routledge/Falmer.
30. Power, M. 2004. The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos.
31. Pring, R. 2000. Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
32. Redfern, M. 2001. The royal Liverpool children's inquiry report. London: The Stationery Office.
33. Redwood, S. 2008. Practitioner enquiry, ethics and the postmodern detective. Paper presented at the Discourse Power Resistance: Cultures in Resistance Conference, March 18-20, in Manchester Metropolitan University.
34. Richardson, S., and M. McMullan. 2007. Research ethics in the UK: What can sociology learn from health? Sociology 41, no. 6: 1115-32.
35. Scott, C. 2008. Relationships: Ethics committees and research. In Don't touch: The educational story of a panic, ed. H. Piper and I. Stronach, chap. 2, 12-22. London: Routledge/Falmer.
36. Scott, C.L. 2003. Ethics and knowledge in the contemporary university. Critical Reviews in International Social and Political Philosophy 6, no. 4: 93-107.
37. Sikes, P. 2008. At the eye of the storm: An academic(s) experience of moral panic. Qualitative Inquiry 14, no. 2: 235-53.
38. Sikes, P., and H. Piper. 2008. Risky research or researching risk? The real role of ethics review. In Talking truth confronting power, ed. J. Satterthwaite, M. Watts, and H. Piper, 51-65. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
39. Sikes, P., and H. Piper. 2010. Researching sex and lies in the classroom: Allegations of sexual misconduct in schools. London: Routledge/Falmer.
40. Simons, H., and R. Usher. 2000. Situated ethics in educational research. London: Routledge/Falmer.
41. Tierney, W., and Z. Blumberg Corwin. 2007. The tensions between academic freedom and Institutional Review Boards. Qualitative Inquiry 13, no. 3: 388-98.
42. Tuhiwai Smith, L. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.