Evaluation of depth of field for depth perception in DVR

IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 81-88

  Grosset, A V Pascal ^a   Schott, Mathias ^b   Bonneau, Georges Pierre ^c   Hansen, Charles D ^a  

^a University of Utah   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

I.3.7 Computer Graphics : Three Dimensional Graphics and Realism Color, shading, shadowing, and texture; I.3.m Computer Graphics : Miscellaneous; I.4.10 Image Processing and Computer Vision : Image Representation Volumetric

Indexed keywords

COLOR , SHADING , SHADOWING , AND TEXTURE; DEPTH OF FIELD; DIRECT VOLUME RENDERING; FAST RESPONSE TIME; I.3.M [COMPUTER GRAPHICS]: MISCELLANEOUS; IMAGE REPRESENTATIONS; ORDINAL DEPTH; PERSPECTIVE PROJECTIONS;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84888984317     PISSN: 21658765     EISSN: 21658773     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PacificVis.2013.6596131     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. B. A. Barsky, D. R. Horn, S. A. Klein, J. A. Pang, and M. Yu. Camera models and optical systems used in computer graphics: Part ii, image-based techniques. In Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 256-265. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2003.
2. B. A. Barsky and T. J. Kosloff. Algorithms for rendering depth of field effects in computer graphics. In Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on Computers, ICCOMP'08, pages 999-1010, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 2008. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).
3. R. Bogacz, E. Brown, J. Moehlis, P. Holmes, and J. D. Cohen. The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113(4):700-765, October 2006.
4. C. Boucheny, G.-P. Bonneau, J. Droulez, G. Thibault, and S. Ploix. A perceptive evaluation of volume rendering techniques. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 5(4):23:1-23:24, Feb. 2009.
5. B. Caldwell, M. Cooper, L. Guarino Reid, and G. Vanderheiden. Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/, 12 2008.
6. K. J. Ciuffreda, B. Wang, and B. Vasudevan. Conceptual model of human blur perception. Vision Research, 47(9):1245-1252, 2007.
7. R. L. Cook, T. Porter, and L. Carpenter. Distributed ray tracing. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 18(3):137-145, Jan. 1984.
8. C. Crassin, F. Neyret, S. Lefebvre, and E. Eisemann. Gigavoxels: ray-guided streaming for efficient and detailed voxel rendering. In Proceedings of the 2009 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games, I3D '09, pages 15-22. ACM, 2009.
9. D. Drascic and P. Milgram. Perceptual issues in augmented reality. In SPIE Volume 2653: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III, pages 123-134, 1996.
10. L. Filippin. T2tpkg. https://sites.google.com/site/t2tpkg/.
11. R. T. Held, E. A. Cooper, and M. S. Banks. Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth. Current Biology, 22(5):426-431, 2012.
12. R. T. Held, E. A. Cooper, J. F. O'Brien, and M. S. Banks. Using blur to affect perceived distance and size. ACM Trans. Graph., 29(2):19:1-19:16, Apr. 2010.
13. R. B. J. Howard Ian P. Seeing in Depth, volume 2 Depth Perception. I Porteous, 2002.
14. D. Knill. Reaching for visual cues to depth: The brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. Journal of Vision, 5(2), 2005.
15. R. Kosara, C. Healey, V. Interrante, D. Laidlaw, and C. Ware. Visualization viewpoints. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 23(4):20-25, july-aug. 2003.
16. M. Kraus and M. Strengert. Depth-of-field rendering by pyramidal image processing. Computer Graphics Forum, 26:645-654, Sep 2007.
17. F. Lindemann and T. Ropinski. About the Influence of Illumination Models on Image Comprehension in Direct Volume Rendering. IEEE TVCG(Vis Proceedings), 17(12):1922-1931, 2011.
18. LLNL. Visit visualization tool, 2012.
19. J. A. Marshall, C. A. Burbeck, D. Ariely, J. P. Rolland, and K. E. Martin. Occlusion edge blur: a cue to relative visual depth. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 13(4):681-688, Apr 1996.
20. G. Mather. Image blur as a pictorial depth cue. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 263(1367):pp. 169-172, 1996.
21. G. Mather and D. R. Smith. Blur discrimination and its relation to blur-mediated depth perception. Perception, 31(10):1211-1219, 2002.
22. G. Mather and D. R. Smith. Combining depth cues: effects upon accuracy and speed of performance in a depth-ordering task. Vision Research, 44(6):557-562, 2004.
23. A. A. Michelson. Studies in Optics. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1927.
24. J. W. Peirce. Psychopy-psychophysics software in python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1-2):8-13, 2007.
25. T. Ropinski, F. Steinicke, and K. Hinrichs. Visually supporting depth perception in angiography imaging. In Smart Graphics, pages 93-104. Springer, 2006.
26. M. Schott, A. V. P. Grosset, T. Martin, V. Pegoraro, S. T. Smith, and C. D. Hansen. Depth of field effects for interactive direct volume rendering. Comput. Graph. Forum, pages 941-950, 2011.
27. M. Schott, V. Pegoraro, C. D. Hansen, K. Boulanger, and K. Bouatouch. A directional occlusion shading model for interactive direct volume rendering. Comput. Graph. Forum, 28(3):855-862, 2009.
28. T. Technology. Tobii t60 and t120 eye tracker. http://www.tobii.com/ Global/Analysis/Downloads/User-Manuals-and-Guides/Tobii-T60-T120-EyeTracker- UserManual.pdf.
29. W. Thompson, R. Fleming, S. Creem-Regehr, and J. K. Stefanucci. Visual Perception from a Computer Graphics Perspective. A. K. Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA, USA, 1st edition, 2011.
30. A. Wykowska, A. Schubö, and B. Hommel. How You Move Is What You See: Action Planning Biases Selection in Visual Search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(6):1755-1769, 2009.