Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth

Current Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 426-431

  Held, Robert T ^a   Cooper, Emily A ^b   Banks, Martin S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PUPIL; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PUPIL; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857952244     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.033     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. H. von Helmholtz Treatise on Physiological Optics, Third Edition, Volume III 1925 Dover New York
2. B.J. Rogers, and M.F. Bradshaw Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis Nature 361 1993 253 255
3. C. Blakemore The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man J. Physiol. 211 1970 599 622
4. H.H. Bülthoff, and H.A. Mallot Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5 1988 1749 1758
5. S.E. Palmer Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology First Edition 1999 MIT Press Boston
6. R.T. Held, E.A. Cooper, J.F. O'Brien, and M.S. Banks Using blur to affect perceived distance and size ACM Transactions on Graphics 29 2010 1 16
7. I. Ohzawa, G.C. DeAngelis, and R.D. Freeman Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors Science 249 1990 1037 1041
8. A. Agarwal, and A. Blake Dense stereo matching over the Panum band IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32 2010 416 430
9. G.E. Poggio Mechanisms of stereopsis in monkey visual cortex Cereb. Cortex 5 1995 193 204
10. H.S. Smallman, and D.I.A. MacLeod Spatial scale interactions in stereo sensitivity and the neural representation of binocular disparity Perception 26 1997 977 994
11. C. Schor, I. Wood, and J. Ogawa Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution Vision Res. 24 1984 661 665
12. G. Walsh, and W.N. Charman Visual sensitivity to temporal change in focus and its relevance to the accommodation response Vision Res. 28 1988 1207 1221
13. R.J. Watt, and M.J. Morgan Spatial filters and the localization of luminance changes in human vision Vision Res. 24 1984 1387 1397
14. J. Burge, and W.S. Geisler Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 2011 16849 16854
15. G. Mather The use of image blur as a depth cue Perception 26 1997 1147 1158
16. J.A. Marshall, C.A. Burbeck, D. Ariely, J.P. Rolland, and K.E. Martin Occlusion edge blur: a cue to relative visual depth J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 13 1996 681 688
17. S.E. Palmer, and J.L. Brooks Edge-region grouping in figure-ground organization and depth perception J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34 2008 1353 1371
18. B.J. Wilson, K.E. Decker, and A. Roorda Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 19 2002 833 839
19. R.J. Jacobs, G. Smith, and C.D. Chan Effect of defocus on blur thresholds and on thresholds of perceived change in blur: comparison of source and observer methods Optom. Vis. Sci. 66 1989 545 553
20. Y.Y. Schechner, and N. Kiryati Depth from defocus vs. stereo: How different really are they? Int. J. Comput. Vis. 39 2000 141 162
21. G.D. Love, D.M. Hoffman, P.J.W. Hands, J. Gao, A.K. Kirby, and M.S. Banks High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display Opt. Express 17 2009 15716 15725
22. M.O. Ernst, and M.S. Banks Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion Nature 415 2002 429 433
23. A.P. Pentland A new sense for depth of field IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 9 1987 523 531
24. G. Mather Image blur as a pictorial depth cue Proc. Biol. Sci. 263 1996 169 172
25. E.F. Fincham The accommodation reflex and its stimulus Br. J. Ophthalmol. 35 1951 381 393
26. F.W. Campbell, J.G. Robson, and G. Westheimer Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions J. Physiol. 145 1959 579 594
27. L.M. Smithline Accommodative response to blur J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64 1974 1512 1516
28. K.H. Spring, and W.S. Stiles Variation of pupil size with change in the angle at which the light stimulus strikes the retina Br. J. Ophthalmol. 32 1948 340 346
29. H. Yamanoue, M. Okui, and F. Okano Geometric analysis of puppet-theater and cardboard effects in stereoscopic HDTV images IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Tech. 16 2006 744 752
30. M. Fendick, and G. Westheimer Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity Vision Res. 23 1983 145 150
31. J. Siderov, R.S. Harwerth, and H.E. Bedell Stereopsis, cyclovergence and the backwards tilt of the vertical horopter Vision Res. 39 1999 1347 1357
32. B. Wang, and K.J. Ciuffreda Blur discrimination of the human eye in the near retinal periphery Optom. Vis. Sci. 82 2005 52 58
33. W. Richards, and J.F. Miller Convergence as a cue to depth Percept. Psychophys. 5 1969 317 320
34. B.J. Rogers, and M.F. Bradshaw Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces Perception 24 1995 155 179
35. C. Flügel-Koch, W.L. Neuhuber, P.L. Kaufman, and E. Lütjen-Drecoll Morphologic indication for proprioception in the human ciliary muscle Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 50 2009 5529 5536
36. S. Mucke, V. Manahilov, N.C. Strang, D. Seidel, L.S. Gray, and U. Shahani Investigating the mechanisms that may underlie the reduction in contrast sensitivity during dynamic accommodation Journal of Vision 10 2010 1 14
37. M. Mon-Williams, and J.R. Tresilian Ordinal depth information from accommodation? Ergonomics 43 2000 391 404
38. S.K. Fisher, and K.J. Ciuffreda Accommodation and apparent distance Perception 17 1988 609 621
39. G.L. Walls The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptive Radiation 1942 Cranbrook Institute Bloomfield Hills, MI
40. J.E. Heath, R.G. Northcutt, and R.P. Barber Rotational optokinesis in reptiles and its bearing on pupillary shape J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 62 1969 75 85
41. T. Malmström, and R.H.H. Kröger Pupil shapes and lens optics in the eyes of terrestrial vertebrates J. Exp. Biol. 209 2006 18 25
42. M.F. Land Visual optics: the shapes of pupils Curr. Biol. 16 2006 R167 R168
43. A.P. Witkin Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture Artif. Intell. 17 1981 17 45
44. K. Akeley, S.J. Watt, A.R. Girshick, and M.S. Banks A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances ACM Trans. Graph. 23 2004 804 813
45. D.M. Hoffman, A.R. Girshick, K. Akeley, and M.S. Banks Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue Journal of Vision 8 2008 1 30
46. K.J. MacKenzie, D.M. Hoffman, and S.J. Watt Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodative control Journal of Vision 10 2010 1 18
47. F.A. Wichmann, and N.J. Hill The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling Perception, &. Psychophysics. 63 2001 1314 1329
48. Birn, J. (2008). Lighting & Rendering in Maya: Lights and Shadows (http://www.3drender.com).
49. F. Brischoux, L. Pizzatto, and R. Shine Insights into the adaptive significance of vertical pupil shape in snakes J. Evol. Biol. 23 2010 1878 1885