Influence of MODIS-derived dynamic vegetation on VIC-simulated soil moisture in oklahoma

Journal of Hydrometeorology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1910-1921

  Ford, Trent W ^a   Quiring, Steven M ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Land surface model; Soil moisture

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL VARIATION; ATMOSPHERE-BIOSPHERE INTERACTION; LAND SURFACE; LEAF AREA INDEX; MODIS; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SOIL MOISTURE; VEGETATION COVER;

GREAT PLAINS; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84888878097     PISSN: 1525755X     EISSN: 15257541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-13-037.1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Albergel, C., P. de Rosnay, C. Gruhier, J. Muñoz-Sabater, S. Hasenauer, L. Isaksen, Y. Kerr, and W. Wagner, 2012: Evaluation of remotely sensed and modeled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ observations. Remote Sens. Environ., 118, 215-226, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.017.
2. Andreadis, K. M., E. A. Clark, A. W. Wood, A. F. Hamlet, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2005: Twentieth-century drought in the conterminous United States. J. Hydrometeor., 6, 985-1001, doi:10.1175/JHM450.1.
3. Cosh, M., T. Ochsner, J. Basara, and T. Jackson, 2010: The SMAP in situ soil moisture sensor testbed: Comparing in situ sensors for satellite validation. Proc. 2010 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Honolulu, HI, IEEE, 699-701, doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5652389.
4. Dekker, S. C., M. Rietkerk, and M. F. P. Bierkens, 2007: Coupling microscale vegetation-soil water and macroscale vegetation- precipitation feedbacks in semiarid ecosystems. Global Change Biol., 13, 671-678, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01327.x.
5. Fensholt, R., I. Sandholt, and M. S. Rasmussen, 2004: Evaluation of MODIS LAI, FAPAR and the relation between FAPAR and NDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements. Remote Sens. Environ., 91, 490-507, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.04.009.
6. Ghilain, N., A. Arboleda, G. Sepulcre-Canto, O. Batelaan, J. Ard̈o, and F. Gellens-Meulenberghs, 2012: Improving evapotranspiration in a land surface model using biophysical variables derived from MSG/SEVIRI satellite. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2567-2583, doi:10.5194/hess-16-2567-2012.
7. Hossain, F., and E. N. Anagnostou, 2005: Numerical investigation of the impact of uncertainties in satellite rainfall estimation and land surface model parameters on simulation of soil moisture. Adv. Water Resour., 28, 1336-1350, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.013.
8. Illston, B. G., J. B. Basara, and K. C. Crawford, 2004: Seasonal to interannual variations of soil moisture measured in Oklahoma. Int. J. Climatol., 24, 1883-1896, doi:10.1002/joc.1077.
9. Illston, B. G., J. B. Basara, and K. C. Crawford, C. A. Fiebrich, K. C. Crawford, E. Hunt, D. K. Fisher, R. Elliott, and K. Humes, 2008: Mesoscale monitoring of soil moisture across a statewide network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 167-182, doi:10.1175/2007JTECHA993.1.
10. Jiang, X., G. Y. Niu, and Z. L. Yang, 2009: Impacts of vegetation and groundwater dynamics on warm season precipitation over the Central United States. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06109, doi:10.1029/2008JD010756.
11. Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305, 1138-1140, doi:10.1126/science.1100217.
12. Legates, D. R., and G. J. McCabe Jr., 1999: Evaluating the use of ''goodness-of-fit'' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241, doi:10.1029/1998WR900018.
13. Luo, L., and Coauthors, 2003: Validation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) retrospective forcing over the southern Great Plains. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8843, doi:10.1029/2002JD003246.
14. Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, E. Wood, and S. Burges, 1994: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14 415-14 428, doi:10.1029/94JD00483.
15. Mahmood, R., and K. G. Hubbard, 2003: Simulating sensitivity of soil moisture and evapotranspiration under heterogeneous soils and land uses. J. Hydrol., 280, 72-90, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00183-5.
16. Maurer, E., A. Wood, J. Adam, D. Lettenmaier, and B. Nijssen, 2002: A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J. Climate, 15, 3237-3251, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015,3237:ALTHBD.2.0.CO;2.
17. McPherson, R. A., 2007: A review of vegetation-atmosphere interactions and their influences on mesoscale phenomena. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 31, 261, doi:10.1177/0309133307079055.
18. Meng, L., and S. M. Quiring, 2008: A comparison of soil moisture models using Soil Climate Analysis Network observations. J. Hydrometeor., 9, 641-659, doi:10.1175/2008JHM916.1.
19. Meng, L., and S. M. Quiring, 2010: Examining the influence of spring soil moisture anomalies on summer precipitation in the U.S. Great Plains using the Community Atmosphere Model version 3. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D21118, doi:10.1029/2010JD014449.
20. Owe, M., R. de Jeu, and T. Holmes, 2008: Multisensor historical climatology of satellite-derived global land surface moisture. J. Geophys. Res., 113, F01002, doi:10.1029/2007JF000769.
21. Pielke, R.A., 2001: Influence of the spatial distribution of vegetation and soils on the prediction of cumulus convective rainfall. Rev. Geophys., 39, 151-177, doi:10.1029/1999RG000072.
22. Quiring, S. M., 2009: Developing objective operational definitions for monitoring drought. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 48, 1217-1229, doi:10.1175/2009JAMC2088.1.
23. Robock, A., and Coauthors, 2003: Evaluation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System over the southern Great Plains during the warm season. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8846, doi:10.1029/2002JD003245.
24. Senay, G. B., and R. L. Elliott, 2000: Combining AVHRR-NDVI and landuse data to describe temporal and spatial dynamics of vegetation. For. Ecol. Manage., 128, 83-91, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00275-3.
25. Sheffield, J., G. Goteti, F. Wen, and E. F. Wood, 2004: A simulated soil moisture based drought analysis for the United States. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D24108, doi:10.1029/2004JD005182.
26. Svoboda, M., and Coauthors, 2002: The Drought Monitor. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1181-1190.
27. Tang, Q., E. R. Vivoni, F. Muñoz-Arriola, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2012: Predictability of evapotranspiration patterns using remotely sensed vegetation dynamics during the North American monsoon. J. Hydrometeor., 13, 103-121, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-032.1.
28. Wang, A., T. J. Bohn, S. P. Mahanama, R. D. Koster, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2009: Multimodel ensemble reconstruction of drought over the continental United States. J. Climate, 22, 2694-2712, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2586.1.
29. Willmott, C. J., and K. Matsuura, 2005: Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Res., 30, 79-82, doi:10.3354/cr030079.
30. Wood, A. W., 2008: The University of Washington Surface Water Monitor: An experimental platform for national hydrologic assessment and prediction. Preprints, 22nd Conf. on Hydrology, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 5.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/134844.pdf.]
31. Wu, W., and R. E. Dickinson, 2004: Time scales of layered soil moisture memory in the context of land-atmosphere interaction. J. Climate, 17, 2752-2764, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017,2752:TSOLSM.2.0.CO;2.
32. Wu, W., and R. E. Dickinson, M. A. Geller, and R. E. Dickinson, 2002: The response of soil moisture to long-term variability of precipitation. J. Hydrometeor., 3, 604-613, doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003,0604:TROSMT.2.0.CO;2.
33. Xia, Y., and Coauthors, 2012: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03109, doi:10.1029/2011JD016048.
34. Zhang, Y., and M. Wegehenkel, 2006: Integration of MODIS data into a simple model for the spatial distributed simulation of soil water content and evapotranspiration. Remote Sens. Environ., 104, 393-408, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.05.011.