On the added value of multiset methods for three-way data analysis

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 129, Issue , 2013, Pages 98-107

  De Roover, Kim ^a   Timmerman, Marieke E ^b   Van Mechelen, Iven ^a   Ceulemans, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clusterwise simultaneous component analysis; Simultaneous component analysis; Three way component analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLUSTERWISE SIMULTANEOUS COMPONENT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULTANEOUS COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE WAY COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84888824781     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kroonenberg P.M. Applied Multiway Data Analysis 2008, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
2. Bro R., Qannari E.M., Kiers H.A.L., Næs T., Frøst M.B. Multi-way models for sensory profiling data. Journal of Chemometrics 2008, 22:36-45. 10.1002/cem.1097.
3. Carroll J.D., Chang J.J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of 'Eckart-Young' decomposition. Psychometrika 1970, 35:283-319. 10.1007/BF02310791.
4. Harshman R.A. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-modal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 1970, 16:1-84.
5. Hitchcock F.L. The expression of a tensor or a polyadic as a sum of products. Journal of Mathematics and Physics 1927, 6:164-189.
6. Tucker L.R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 1966, 31:279-311.
7. De Roover K., Ceulemans E., Timmerman M.E. How to perform multiblock component analysis in practice. Behavior Research Methods 2012, 44:41-56. 10.3758/s13428-011-0129-1.
8. Timmerman M.E., Kiers H.A.L. Four simultaneous component models of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences. Psychometrika 2003, 86(1):105-122.
9. De Roover K., Ceulemans E., Timmerman M.E., Onghena P. A clusterwise simultaneous component method for capturing within-cluster differences in component variances and correlations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2013, 86:81-102. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02040.x.
10. De Roover K., Ceulemans E., Timmerman M.E., Vansteelandt K., Stouten J., Onghena P. Clusterwise simultaneous component analysis for analyzing structural differences in multivariate multiblock data. Psychological Methods 2012, 17(1):100-119.
11. Bro R. Multi-Way Analysis in the Food Industry: Models, Algorithms, and Applications 1998, (Ph.D. thesis), University of Amsterdam.
12. Bro R., Smilde A.K. Centering and scaling in component analysis. Journal of Chemometrics 2003, 17:16-33. 10.1002/cem.773.
13. Harshman R.A., Lundy M.E. Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis 1984, 122-215. Praeger. H.G. Law, C.W. Snyder, J.A. Hattie, R.P. McDonald (Eds.).
14. van den Berg R.A., Hoefsloot H.C.J., Westerhuis J.A., Smilde A.K., van der Werf M. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:142. 10.1186/1471-2164-7-142.
15. Timmerman M.E. Multilevel component analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2006, 59:301-320. 10.1348/000711005X67599.
16. Stegeman A. On uniqueness conditions for Candecomp/Parafac and Indscal with full column rank in one mode. Linear Algebra and its Applications 2009, 431:211-227. 10.1016/j.laa.2009.02.025.
17. Ceulemans E., Timmerman M.E., Kiers H.A.L. The CHULL procedure for selecting among multilevel component solutions. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2011, 106(1):12-20. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.08.001.
18. De Roover K., Ceulemans E., Timmerman M.E., Nezlek J.B., Onghena P. Modeling differences in the dimensionality of multiblock data by means of clusterwise simultaneous component analysis. Psychometrika 2013, (advance online publication). 10.1007/s11336-013-9318-4.
19. Bulteel K., Wilderjans T.F., Tuerlinckx F., Ceulemans E. CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers. Behavior Research Methods 2013, (advance online publication). 10.3758/s13428-012-0293-y.
20. Wilderjans T.F., Ceulemans E., Meers K. CHull: a generic convex-hull-based model selection method. Behavior Research Methods 2013, 45:1-15. 10.3758/s13428-012-0238-5.
21. Ceulemans E., Kiers H.A.L. Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: a numerical convex hull based method. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2006, 59:133-150. 10.1348/000711005X64817.
22. Ceulemans E., Kiers H.A.L. Discriminating between strong and weak structures in three-mode principal component analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2009, 62:601-620. 10.1348/000711008X369474.
23. Bro R., Kiers H.A.L. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. Journal of Chemometrics 2003, 17:274-286. 10.1002/cem.801.
24. Timmerman M.E., Kiers H.A.L. Three-mode principal component analysis: choosing the numbers of components and sensitivity to local optima. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2000, 53:1-16. 10.1348/000711000159132.
25. Andersson C.A., Bro R. The N-way toolbox for MATLAB. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2000, 52:1-4. 10.1016/S0169-7439(00)00071-X.
26. Tucker L.R. A Method for Synthesis of Factor Analysis Studies (Personnel Research section Rep. No. 984) 1951, Washington, DC, Department of the Army.
27. Lorenzo-Seva U., ten Berge J.M.F. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2006, 2(2):57-64. 10.1027/1614-1881.2.2.57.
28. Van Mechelen I., Smilde A.K. Comparability problems in the analysis of multiway data. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2011, 106:2-11. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.08.006.
29. Bro R., Anderson C.A., Kiers H.A.L. Parafac 2 - part II. Modeling chromatographic data with retention time shifts. Journal of Chemometrics 1999, 13:295-309. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199905/08)13:3/4<295::AID-CEM547>3.0.CO;2-Y.