Disentangling the consensus frame of food security: The case of the EU Common Agricultural Policy reform debate

Food Policy

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages 47-58

  Candel, Jeroen J L ^a   Breeman, Gerard E ^a   Stiller, Sabina J ^a   Termeer, Catrien J A M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Common Agricultural Policy; Consensus frame; European Union; Food policy; Food security; Framing

Indexed keywords

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EUROPEAN UNION; FOOD POLICY; FOOD SECURITY; POLICY REFORM; REFORM PROCESS; SOVEREIGNTY; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84888778233     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agra Europe, 2010a. CAP impact on land use disputed, Agra Europe.
2. Agra Europe, 2010b. MEPs campaign against CAP budget cuts post-2013, Agra Europe.
3. Agra Europe, 2011. CAP reform 'can be more radical', Agra Europe.
4. Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, 2011. Motion for a resolution to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and the Commission pursuant to Rule 110(2) of the Rules of Procedure on rising food prices. European Parliament.
5. Anthony R. Taming the unruly side of ethics: overcoming challenges of a bottom-up approach to ethics in the areas of food policy and climate change. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2012, 25:813-841.
6. ASBL NATAGORA, 2011. Consultation for the Impact Assessment on the "Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020" Proposals. European Commission.
7. Assembly of European Regions, 2011. Consultation for the Impact Assessment on the "Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020" Proposals. European Commission.
8. Béland D. Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy 2009, 16:701-718.
9. Béland D., Cox R.H. Ideas and politics in social science research 2011, Oxford University Press, New York.
10. Brunori G., Malandrin V., Rossi A. Trade-off or convergence? The role of food security in the evolution of food discourse in Italy. Journal of Rural Studies 2013, 29:19-29.
11. Campbell J.L. Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology 2002, 28:21-38.
12. Coceral, 2011. Consultation for the Impact Assessment on the "Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020" Proposals. European Commission.
13. Dewulf A., Gray B., Putnam L., Lewicki R., Aarts N., Bouwen R., van Woerkum C. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations 2009, 62:155-193.
14. Entman R.M. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. JC 1993, 43:51-58.
15. European Commission, 2009. Policy Coherence for Development - Establishing the policy framework for a whole-of-the-Union approach, 15 September, COM (2009) 458 final European Commission, Brussels.
16. European Commission, 2010a. The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future, 18 November, COM (2010) 672. European Commission, Brussels.
17. European Commission, 2010b. The EU Budget Review, 19 October, COM(2010) 700 final. European Commission, Brussels.
18. Fair Trade Advocacy Office, 2011. Consultation for the Impact Assessment on the "Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020" Proposals. European Commission.
19. Fairbairn M. Framing transformation: the counter-hegemonic potential of food sovereignty in the US context. Agriculture and Human Values 2012, 29:217-230.
20. Feindt P.H., Oels A. Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2005, 7:161-173.
21. Fish R., Lobley M., Winter M. A license to produce? Farmer interpretations of the new food security agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 2012.
22. Freibauer, A., Mathijs, E., Brunori, G., Damianova, Z., Faroult, E., Girona i Gomis, J., O'Brien, L., Treyer, S., 2011. Sustainable food consumption and production in a resource-constrained world. European Commission - Standing Committee on Agricultural Research, Brussels.
23. Friends of the Earth Cyprus, 2011. Consultation for the Impact Assessment on the "Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020" Proposals. European Commission.
24. Gamson W.A. Constructing social protest. Social Movements and Culture: Social Movements, Protest, and Contention 1995, 85-106. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. H. Johnston, B. Klandermands (Eds.).
25. Gamson W.A., Lasch K.E. The political culture of social welfare policy. Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives 1983, 397-415. Academic Press, New York. S.E. Spiro, E. Yuchtman-Yaar (Eds.).
26. Grant W. Economic patriotism in European agriculture. Journal of European Public Policy 2012, 19:420-434.
27. Grant W.P. Can political science contribute to agricultural policy?. Policy and Society 2012, 31:271-279.
28. Hamann R., Giamporcaro S., Johnston D., Yachkaschi S. The role of business and cross-sector collaboration in addressing the 'wicked problem' of food insecurity. Development Southern Africa 2011, 28:579-594.
29. Highland and Islands of Scotland European Partnership, 2011. Consultation for the Impact Assessment on the "Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020" Proposals. European Commission.
30. Hinrichs C.C. Regionalizing food security? Imperatives, intersections and contestations in a post-9/11 world. Journal of Rural Studies 2012.
31. Jarosz L. Defining world hunger: scale and neoliberal ideology in international food security policy discourse. Food, Culture and Society 2011, 14:117-139.
32. Kirwan J., Maye D. Food security framings within the UK and the integration of local food systems. Journal of Rural Studies 2013, 29:91-100.
33. Lang T., Barling D. Food security and food sustainability: reformulating the debate. Geographical Journal 2012, 178:313-326.
34. Lynggaard K., Nedergaard P. The logic of policy development: lessons learned from reform and routine within the CAP 1980-2003. Journal of European Integration 2009, 31:291-309.
35. MacMillan T., Dowler E. Just and sustainable? Examining the rhetoric and potential realities of UK food security. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2012, 25:181-204.
36. Maye D., Kirwan J. Food security: a fractured consensus. Journal of Rural Studies 2013, 29:1-6.
37. Meijerink S. Understanding policy stability and change. the interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945-20031. Journal of European Public Policy 2005, 12:1060-1077.
38. Mooney P.H., Hunt S.A. Food security: the elaboration of contested claims to a consensus frame. Rural Sociology 2009, 74:469-497.
39. Ó Gráda C. Famines past, Famine's future. Development and Change 2011, 42:49-69.
40. Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 1973, 4:155-169.
41. Rosin C. Food security and the justification of productivism in New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies 2013, 29:50-58.
42. Schmidt V.A. Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 2008, 11:303-326.
43. Semetko H.A., Valkenburg P.M. Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. JC 2000, 50:93-109.
44. Skogstad G. Ideas, paradigms and institutions: agricultural exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States. Governance 1998, 11:463-490.
45. Termeer C.J.A.M., Werkman R.A. Changing closed agricultural policy communities. Critical Policy Studies 2011, 5:283-298.
46. Termeer C.J.A.M., Dewulf A., Breeman G., Stiller S.J. Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems 2013, Administration & Society.
47. Tomlinson I. Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion: A critical perspective on a key discourse of food security in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 2011.
48. Tomlinson I. Doubling food production to feed the 9 billion: a critical perspective on a key discourse of food security in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 2013, 29:81-90.
49. Van den Brink M. Rijkswaterstaat on the horns of a dilemma 2009, Eburon, Delft.
50. Van Gorp B. Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication 2005, 20:484-507.
51. Van Gorp B. The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. JC 2007, 57:60-78.
52. Van Gorp B., Van der Groot M.J. Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Stakeholder's Frames. Communication, Culture & Critique 2012, 5:127-148.
53. van Lieshout M., Dewulf A., Aarts N., Termeer C. Doing scalar politics: interactive scale framing for managing accountability in complex policy processes. Critical Policy Studies 2012, 6:163-181.
54. Verloo M., Lombardo E. Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: introducing a critical frame analysis approach. Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe 2007, 21-49. Central European University Press, Budapest. M. Verloo (Ed.).
55. Verts/ALE Group, 2010. Motion for a resolution to wind up the debate on statements by the European Council and Commission pursuant to Rule 110(2) of the Rules of Procedure on Europe 2020 - new European strategy for jobs and growth. European Parliament.
56. Zahrnt V. Food security and the eu's common agricultural policy: Facts against fears 2011, ECIPE, Brussels.