Staphylococcal biofilm growth on smooth and porous titanium coatings for biomedical applications

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 215-224

  Braem, Annabel ^a   Van Mellaert, Lieve ^b   Mattheys, Tina ^a   Hofmans, Dorien ^b   De Waelheyns, Evelien ^b   Geris, Liesbet ^c   Anné, Jozef ^b   Schrooten, Jan ^a   Vleugels, Jef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b REGA INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

biofilm formation; porous Ti coating; roughness; Staphylococci; surface properties

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM COATINGS; BIOFILMS; LINEAR REGRESSION; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PLASMA SPRAYING; PORE SIZE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

BIOFILM FORMATION; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PLASMA-SPRAYED COATINGS; POROSITY AND PORE SIZE; STAPHYLOCOCCI; SURFACE FUNCTIONALIZATION; TI COATING;

COATINGS;

NANOCOATING; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOFILM; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INFECTION RISK; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PLASMA; POROSITY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; VACUUM; CHEMISTRY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; WETTABILITY;

BIOFILMS; POROSITY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; TITANIUM; WETTABILITY;

EID: 84888637971     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34688     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M,. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 780-785.
2. Bozic KJ, Katz P, Cisternas M, Ono L, Ries MD, Showstack J,. Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 570-576.
3. Urquhart DM, Hanna F, Graves S, Wang Y, Cameron P, Hannaford A, Cicuttini FM,. In-hospital outcomes and hospital resource utilization of hip replacement procedures. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78: 875-880.
4. Data obtained from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: Annual report 2010. http://nrlweb.ihelse.net [accessed on 31.08.2011].
5. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ,. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 128-133.
6. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ,. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 45-51.
7. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J,. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 984-991.
8. Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR,. The significance of infection related to orthopaedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2331-2339.
9. Costerton JW,. Biofilm theory can guide the treatment of device-related orthopaedic infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 437: 7-11.
10. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR,. Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs 2005; 28: 1062-1068.
11. Arciola CR, Alvi FI, An YH, Campoccia D, Montanaro L,. Implant infection and infection resistant materials: a mini review. Int J Artif Organs 2005; 28: 1119-1125.
12. Percival SL, Hill KE, Malic S, Thomas DW, Williams DW,. Antimicrobial tolerance and the significance of persister cells in recalcitrant chronic wound biofilms. Wound Repair Regen 2011; 19: 1-9.
13. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Speziale P, Montanaro L, Costerton JW,. Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 5967-5982.
14. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK,. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants-A review. Prog Mater Sci 2009; 54: 397-425.
15. Joseph TN, Chen AL, Di Cesare PE,. Use of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003; 11: 38-47.
16. Berry DJ, Bozic KJ,. Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (6): 2-4.
17. Cummins JS, Tomek IM, Kantor SR, Furnes O, Engesæter LB, Finlayson SRG,. Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 634-641.
18. Ryan G, Pandit A, Apatsidis DP,. Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2651-2670.
19. Otsuki B, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T,. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 5892-5900.
20. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D,. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5474-5491.
21. Itälä AI, Ylänen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT,. Pore diameter of more than 100 μm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58: 679-683.
22. Wazen RM, Lefebvre LP, Baril E, Nanci A,. Initial evaluation of bone ingrowth into a novel porous titanium coating. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater 2010; 94B: 64-71.
23. Baril E, Lefebvre LP, Hacking SA,. Direct visualization and quantification of bone growth into porous titanium implants using micro computed tomography. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2011; 22: 1321-1332.
24. Harris LG, Richards RG,. Staphylococci and implant surfaces: a review. Injury 2006; 37: s3-s14.
25. Neut D, Dijkstra RJB, Thompson JI, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ,. A gentamicin-releasing coating for cementless hip prostheses-longitudinal evaluation of efficacy using in vitro bio-optical imaging and its wide-spectrum antibacterial efficacy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012;doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34258.
26. Wu Y, Zitelli JP, TenHuisen KS, Yu X, Libera MR,. Differential response of Staphylococci and osteoblasts to varying titanium surface roughness. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 951-960.
27. Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ,. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 706-713.
28. Barbour ME, O'Sullivan DJ, Jenkinson HF, Jagger DC,. The effects of polishing methods on surface morphology, roughness and bacterial colonization of titanium abutments. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 1439-1447.
29. Rodríguez-Hernández AG, Juárez A, Engel E, Gil FJ,. Streptococcus sanguinis adhesion on titanium rough surfaces: effect of shot-blasting particles. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2011; 22: 1913-1922.
30. Ercan B, Kummer KM, Tarquinio KM, Webster TJ,. Decreased Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on anodized nanotubular titanium and the effect of electrical stimulation. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 3003-3012.
31. 2 and hydroxyapatite thin layers deposited on titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy for medical applications. Thin Solid Films 2010; 519: 797-803.
32. Yoshinari M, Oda Y, Kato T, Okuda K, Hirayama A,. Influence of surface modifications to titanium on oral bacterial adhesion in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 52: 388-394.
33. Fröjd V, Chávez de Paz L, Andersson M, Wennerberg A, Davies JR, Svensäter G,. In situ analysis of multispecies biofilm formation on customized titanium surfaces. Molec Oral Microbiol 2011; 26: 241-252.
34. 2 suspensions. Adv Eng Mater 2011; 13: 509-515.
35. 2 stabilised emulsions. Adv Eng Mater 2012; 14: 371-376.
36. Gasik M, Van Mellaert L, Pierron D, Braem A, Hofmans D, De Waelheyns E, Anné J, Harmand M-F, Vleugels J,. Reduction of biofilm infection risks and promotion of osteointegration for optimized surfaces of titanium implants. Adv Healthc Mater 2012; 1 (1): 117-127.
37. Chaudhari A, Braem A, Vleugels J, Martens JA, Naert I, Vivan Cardoso M, Duyck J,. Bone tissue response to porous and functionalized titanium and silica based coatings. PloS ONE 2011; 6:doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024186.
38. 2 multifunctional composites obtained by different processing methods. In:, Kawasaki A, Kumakawa A, Niino M, editors. 10th International Symposium on Multiscale, Multifunctional and Functionally Graded Materials;22-25 September 2008; Sendai, Japan. Zürich: Trans tech publ. Materials Science Forum; 2010. vol. 631-632:p. 141-146.
39. Nishimura S, Tsurumoto T, Yonekura A, Adachi K, Shindo H,. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms isolated from infected total hip arthroplasty cases. J Orthop Sci 2006; 11: 46-50.
40. Bruinsma GM, Rustema-Abbing M, de Vries J, Busscher HJ, van der Linden ML, Hooymans JMM, van der Mei HC,. Multiple surface properties of worn RGP lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1663-1670.
41. Bakker DP, Busscher HJ, van Zanten J, de Vries J, Klijnstra JW, van der Mei H,. Multiple linear regression analysis of bacterial deposition to polyurethane coatings after conditioning film formation in the marine environment. Microbiology 2004; 150: 1779-1784.
42. Chin MYH, Sandham A, Pratten J, De Vries J, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ,. Multivariate analysis of surface physico-chemical properties controlling biofilm formation on orthodontic adhesives prior to and after fluoride and chlorhexidine treatment. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 78B: 401-408.
43. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T,. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 331-344.
44. Giljean S, Bigerelle M, Anselme K, Haidara H,. New insights on contact angle/roughness dependence on high surface energy materials. Appl Surf Sci 2011; 257: 9631-9638.
45. An YH, Friedman RJ,. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 1998; 43: 338-348.
46. Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF,. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interaction. Eur Cell Mater 2004; 8: 37-57.
47. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M,. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Imp Res 2006; 17: 68-81.