Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors

Water Research

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 420-429

  Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ^a,b   Ozgun, Hale ^a,b   Tao, Yu ^a,c   van Lier, Jules B ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Cake filtration; Dynamic membrane; Wastewater treatment; Woven fabric

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOCONVERSION; BIOREACTORS; MICROFILTRATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WEAVING;

ANAEROBIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; CAKE FILTRATION; COD REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; DYNAMIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS; DYNAMIC MEMBRANES; EXTRA-CELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; HIGH STRENGTH WASTEWATER; WOVEN FABRICS;

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY;

POLYMER; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; SEWAGE; WASTE WATER;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FILTRATION; FLOCCULATION; MEMBRANE; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLYMER; SLUDGE; WASTEWATER;

ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FLOCCULATION; FOULING CONTROL; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLUDGE TREATMENT; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOREACTOR; DEVICES; FILTRATION; SEWAGE; WASTE WATER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOREACTORS; FILTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; SEWAGE; WASTE WATER; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84888429532     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.054     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahmed Z., Cho J., Lim B.R., Song K.G., Ahn K.H. Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:211-218.
2. Aiyuk S., Verstraete W. Sedimentological evolution in an UASB treating SYNTHES, a new representative synthetic sewage, at low loading rates. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93:269-278.
3. Akram A., Stuckey D.C. Biomass acclimatisation and adaptation during start-up of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR). Environ. Technol. 2008, 29:1053-1065.
4. An Y., Wang Z., Wu Z., Yang D., Zhou Q. Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155:709-715.
5. APHA Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington, USA.
6. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
7. Chu L., Li S. Filtration capability and operational characteristics of dynamic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Separat. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51:173-179.
8. Dereli R.K., Ersahin M.E., Ozgun H., Ozturk I., Jeison D., van der Zee F., van Lier J.B. Potentials of anaerobic membrane bioreactors to overcome treatment limitations induced by industrial wastewaters. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:160-170.
9. Drews A., Vocks M., Iversen V., Lesjean B., Kraume M. Influence of unsteady membrane bioreactor operation on EPS formation and filtration resistance. Desalination 2006, 192:1-9.
10. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28:350-356.
11. Durante F., Di Bella G., Torregrossa M., Viviani G. Particle size distribution and biomass growth in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2006, 199:493-495.
12. Ersahin M.E., Ozgun H., van Lier J.B. Effect of support material properties on dynamic membrane filtration performance. Separ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48(15):2263-2269.
13. Ersahin M.E., Ozgun H., Dereli R.K., Ozturk I., Roest K., van Lier J.B. A review on dynamic membrane filtration: materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:196-206.
14. Ersahin M.E., Ozgun H., Dereli R.K., Ozturk I. Anaerobic treatment of industrial effluents: an overview of applications. Waste Water-treatment and Reutilization 2011, 3-28. InTech, India. F.S.G. Einschlag (Ed.).
15. Gao M., Yang M., Li H., Yang Q., Zhang Y. Comparison between a submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge system on treating ammonia-bearing inorganic wastewater. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 108:265-269.
16. Ho J.H., Khanal S.K., Sung S. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for treatment of synthetic municipal wastewater at ambient temperature. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55(7):79-86.
17. Hu A.Y., Stuckey D.C. Treatment of dilute wastewaters using a novel submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J. Environ. Eng. 2006, 132(2):190-198.
18. Huang Z., Ong S.L., Ng H.Y. Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Res. 2011, 45:705-713.
19. Jeison D., van Lier J.B. Anaerobic wastewater treatment and membrane filtration: a one night stand or a sustainable relationship?. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57(4):527-532.
20. Jeison D., Diaz I., van Lier J.B. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors: are membranes really necessary?. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 11(4):1-7.
21. Jeison D., van Lier J.B. Cake formation and consolidation: main factors governing the applicable flux in anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) treating acidified wastewaters. Separat. Purif. Technol. 2007, 56(1):71-78.
22. Khan S.J., Visvanathan C., Jegatheesan V., BenAim R. Influence of mechanical mixing rates on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in MBRs. Separat. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43(7):1826-1838.
23. Kiso Y., Jung Y.J., Ichinari T., Park M., Kitao T., Nishimura K., Min K.S. Wastewater treatment performance of a filtration bio-reactor equipped with a mesh as a filter material. Water Res. 2000, 34(17):4143-4150.
24. Lee W., Kang S., Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 216(1-2):217-227.
25. Li J., Ozgun H., Ersahin M.E., Spanjers H., van Lier J.B. Comparative evaluation of the sludge characteristics along the height of full-scale UASB and EGSB reactors treating paper-mill effluents. X Latin American Workshop and Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion, 23-27 October, Ouro Preto, Brasil 2011.
26. Liao B.Q., Kraemer J.T., Bagley D.M. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications and research directions. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 36(6):489-530.
27. Lin H.J., Xie K., Mahendran B., Bagley D.M., Leung K.T., Liss S.N., Liao B.Q. Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs). Water Res. 2009, 43:3827-3837.
28. Lin H., Liao B.Q., Chen J., Gao W., Wang L., Wang F., Lu X. New insights into membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor based on characterization of cake sludge and bulk sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(3):2373-2379.
29. Lin H., Peng W., Zhang M., Chen J., Hong H., Zhang Y. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications, membrane fouling and future perspectives. Desalination 2013, 314:169-188.
30. Martin M.A., De la Rubia M.A., Martin A., Borja R., Montalvo S., Sanchez E. Kinetic evaluation of the psychrophylic anaerobic digestion of synthetic domestic sewage using an upflow filter. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:131-137.
31. Martinez-Sosa D., Helmreich B., Netter T., Paris S., Bischof F., Horn H. Anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment under mesophilic and psychrophilic temperature conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:10377-10385.
32. Masse A., Sperandio M., Cabassud C. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res. 2006, 40(12):2405-2415.
33. Meng F., Chae S.R., Drews A., Kraume M., Shin H.S., Yang F. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res. 2009, 43:1489-1512.
34. Meng F., Zhang H., Yang F., Li Y., Xiao J., Zhang X. Effect of filamentous bacteria on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 272(1-2):161-168.
35. Neyens E., Baeyens J., Dewil R., De heyder B. Advanced sludge treatment affects extracellular polymeric substances to improve activated sludge dewatering. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 106(2-3):83-92.
36. Ozgun H., Dereli R.K., Ersahin M.E., Kinaci C., Spanjers H., van Lier J.B. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: integration options, limitations and expectations. Separat. Purif. Technol. 2013, 118:89-104.
37. Park M.S., Kiso Y., Jung Y.J., Simase M., Wang W.H., Kitao T., Min K.S. Sludge thickening performance of mesh filtration process. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50(8):125-133.
38. Ren X., Shon H.K., Jang N., Lee Y.G., Bae M., Lee J., Cho K., Kim I.S. Novel membrane bioreactor (MBR) coupled with a nonwoven fabric filter for household wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2010, 44:751-760.
39. Sawalha O., Scholz M. Modeling the relationship between capillary suction time and specific resistance to filtration. J. Environ. Eng. 2010, 136(9):983-991.
40. Satyawali Y., Balakrishnan M. Treatment of distillery effluent in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) equipped with mesh filter. Separat. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:278-286.
41. Seo G.T., Moon B.H., Lee T.S., Lim T.J., Kim I.S. Non-woven fabric filter separation activated sludge reactor for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 47(1):133-138.
42. Shin H.S., Kang S.T. Characteristics and fates of soluble microbial products in ceramic membrane bioreactor at various sludge retention times. Water Res. 2003, 37:121-127.
43. Smith A.L., Skerlos S.J., Raskin L. Pychrophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater. Water Res. 2013, 47(4):1655-1665.
44. Su Y., Pan J.R., Huang C., Chang C. Impact of sludge retention time on sludge characteristics and microbial community in MBR. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63(10):2250-2254.
45. Thuy Q.T.T., Visvanathan C. Removal of inhibitory compounds by biological activated carbon coupled membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 35:89-97.
46. van Lier J.B. High-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment: diversifying from end-of-the-pipe treatment to resource-oriented techniques. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57(8):1137-1148.
47. Waeger F., Delhaye T., Fuchs W. The use of ceramic microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes for particle removal from anaerobic digester effluents. Separat. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73:271-278.
48. Wang X.M., Li X.Y., Huang X. Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR): characterisation of the sludge cake and its high filtration resistance. Separat. Purif. Technol. 2007, 52:439-445.
49. Xuan W., Bin Z., Zhiqiang S., Zhigang Q., Zhaoli C., Min J., Junwen L., Jingfeng W. The EPS characteristics of sludge in an aerobic granule membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(21):8046-8050.
50. Zhang X., Wang Z., Wu Z., Lu F., Tong J., Zang L. Formation of dynamic membrane in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 165:175-183.
51. Zhang X., Wang Z., Wu Z., Wei T., Lu F., Tong J., Mai S. Membrane fouling in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: characteristics of membrane foulants and bulk sludge. Process Biochem. 2011, 46:1538-1544.