Quantum entanglement and information processing via excitons in optically driven quantum dots

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 8-

  Reina, John H ^a   Quiroga, Luis ^b   Johnson, Neil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888365814     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.012305     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. R.P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982);
2. R.P. FeynmanOpt. News 11, 11 (1985).
3. D. Deutsch, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 400, 97 (1985).
4. W.K. Wooters and W.H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982);
5. N.D. Mermin, Phys. Today 38 (4), 38 (1985);
6. Phys. TodayW.H. Zurek, 44 (10), 36 (1991;);
7. Phys. TodayC.H. Bennett, 48 (10), 24 (1995);see articles in the special issue on quantum information, Phys. World 11, March 1998;
8. A. Ekert and R. Jozsa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733 (1996).
9. A.K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991);
10. Phys. Rev. Lett.C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N.D. Mermin, 68, 557 (1992);
11. C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and A. Ekert, Sci. Am. 267 (4), 26 (1992).
12. C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W.K. Wooters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
13. P.W. Shor, in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, edited by S. Goldwasser (IEEE Computer Society, Santa Fe, 1994), p. 124.
14. P.W. Shor, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2493 (1995);
15. A.M. Steane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996).
16. J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995);
17. Phys. Rev. Lett.C. Monroe, D.M. Meekhof, B.E. King, W.M. Itano, and D.J. Wineland, 75, 4714 (1995).
18. Q.A. Turchete, C.J. Hood, W. Lange, H. Mabuchi, and H.J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4710 (1995).
19. N.A. Gershenfeld and I.L. Chuang, Science 275, 350 (1997);
20. D.G. Cory, A.F. Fahmy, and T.F. Havel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 1634 (1997);
21. E. Knill, I.L. Chuang, and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3348 (1998);
22. J.A. Jones, M. Mosca, and R.H. Hansen, Nature (London) 393, 344 (1998).
23. A. Shnirman, G. Schön, and Z. Hermon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2371 (1997);
24. D.V. Averin, Solid State Commun. 105, 659 (1998);
25. Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Nature (London) 398, 305 (1999).
26. B.E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998);
27. D. Loss and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998);
28. G. Burkard, D. Loss, and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999);
29. A. Barenco, D. Deutsch, A. Ekert, and R. Jozsa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4083 (1995);
30. Phys. Rev. Lett.A. Imamoglu, D.D. Awschalom, G. Burkard, D.P. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, M. Sherwin, and A. Small, 83, 4204 (1999);
31. R. Vrijen, E. Yablonovitch, K. Wang, H.W. Jiang, A. Balandin, and D.P. DiVincenzo, e-print quant-ph/9905096.
32. N.H. Bonadeo, J. Erland, D. Gammon, D.S. Katzer, D. Park, and D.G. Steel, Science 282, 1473 (1998).
33. N.H. Bonadeo, G. Chen, D. Gammon, D.S. Katzer, D. Park, and D.G. Steel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2759 (1998).
34. A. Chavez-Pirson, J. Temmyo, H. Kamada, H. Gotoh, and H. Ando, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 3494 (1998).
35. J.S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
36. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
37. D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, in Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, edited by M. Kafatos (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989), p. 73;
38. D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990).
39. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
40. Throughout this paper we refer to this phase factor as the “(Formula presented) pulse” to denote the type of entangled state generated in the optical process.
41. L. Quiroga and N.F. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2270 (1999).
42. We ignore the constant term (Formula presented) in the Hamiltonian H.
43. In general for (Formula presented) the multiplicity (Formula presented), hence q is irrelevant.
44. J.H. Reina (unpublished).
45. Write (Formula presented) (Formula presented). From the expansion given for (Formula presented) it follows that (Formula presented), hence the general expresion for the coefficients (Formula presented) becomes (Formula presented).
46. J.H. Reina and N.F. Johnson, e-print cond-mat/9906034.
47. A. Schülzgen, R. Binder, M.E. Donovan, M. Lindberg, K. Wundke, H.M. Gibbs, G. Khitrova, and N. Peyghambarian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2346 (1999).
48. F.J. Rodríguez, L. Quiroga, and N.F. Johnson, e-print cond-mat/9909139.