Change in classification grade by the srs-schwab adult spinal deformity classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures; prospective analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 19, 2013, Pages 1663-1671

  Smith, Justin S ^a   Klineberg, Eric ^b   Schwab, Frank ^c   Shaffrey, Christopher I ^a   Moal, Bertrand ^c   Ames, Christopher P ^d   Hostin, Richard ^e   Fu, Kai Ming G ^f   Burton, Douglas ^g   Akbarnia, Behrooz ^h   Gupta, Munish ^b   Hart, Robert ⁱ   Bess, Shay ^j   Lafage, Virginie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e Baylor Scoliosis Center   (United States)

^f WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR SPINAL DISORDERS   (United States)

ⁱ OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Adult spinal deformity; Classification; Outcomes; Pelvis; Sagittal alignment; Surgery; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY SCHWAB CLASSIFICATION; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84888356457     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ec563     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Kuntz C, et al. Classification systems for adolescent and adult scoliosis . Neurosurgery 2008; 63 : 16 - 24 .
2. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis . J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A : 1169 - 81 .
3. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis . J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65 : 1302 - 13 .
4. Aebi M . The adult scoliosis . Eur Spine J 2005; 14 : 925 - 48 .
5. Schwab F, el-Fegoun AB, Gamez L, et al. A lumbar classification of scoliosis in the adult patient: preliminary approach . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30 : 1670 - 3 .
6. Schwab F, Farcy JP, Bridwell K, et al. A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31 : 2109 - 14 .
7. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society- Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: A validation study . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37 : 1077 - 82 .
8. Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, et al. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31 : S119 - 25 .
9. Smith JS, Abel MF, Shaffrey CI, et al. Decision making in pediatric spinal deformity . Neurosurgery 2008; 63 : 54 - 68 .
10. Smith JS, Fu KM, Urban P, et al. Neurological symptoms and deficits in adults with scoliosis who present to a surgical clinic: incidence and association with the choice of operative versus nonoperative management . J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9 : 326 - 31 .
11. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: A retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year followup . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 : 1693 - 8 .
12. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis . Neurosurgery 2009; 65 : 86 - 93; discussion 4.
13. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, et al. Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: An analysis based on patient age . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36 : 817 - 24 .
14. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: Two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 : E599 - E606 .
15. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, et al. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: Analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33 : 1572 - 8 .
16. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess B, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: A prospective multicenter analysis . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (13): E803 - E812 .
17. Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A, et al. Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies . Eur Spine J 2006; 15 : 982 - 91 .
18. Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, et al. [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance] . Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003; 89 : 218 - 27 .
19. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: How much change is significant? Paper presented at: International Meeting for Advanced Spine Techniques; 2005; Banf, Canada .
20. Bureau USC . Population Projections of the United States by Age, Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin: 1995-2050. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/1/ pop/p25-1130.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2013 .
21. Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, et al. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30 : 1082 - 5 .
22. Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, et al. Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 : 2186 - 90 .
23. Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Berven S, et al. Changes in radiographic and clinical outcomes with primary treatment adult spinal deformity surgeries from two years to three- To five-years follow-up . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35 : 1849 - 54 .
24. Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, et al. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: A prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 : 2171 - 8 .
25. Li G, Passias P, Kozanek M, et al. Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 : 2165 - 70 .
26. Glassman SD, Schwab F, Bridwell KH, et al. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery ? Spine J 2009; 9 : 317 - 22 .
27. Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Shaffrey CI, et al. The costs and benefi ts of nonoperative management for adult scoliosis . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35 : 578 - 82 .
28. Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, et al. Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults . J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16 : 547 - 64 .