Land use regulation and intraregional population-employment interaction

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 671-693

  Kim, Jae Hong ^a   Hewings, Geoffrey J D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

J61; R23; R31; R52

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; EMPLOYMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; METROPOLITAN AREA; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN POPULATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84888074849     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-013-0557-1     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. American Institute of Planners (1976) Survey of state land use planning activity. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC.
2. Boarnet MG (1994a) An empirical model of intrametropolitan population and employment growth. Pap Reg Sci 73: 135-152.
3. Boarnet MG (1994b) The monocentric model and employment location. J Urban Econ 36: 79-97.
4. Boarnet MG, Chalermpong S, Geho E (2005) Specification issues in models of population and employment growth. Pap Reg Sci 84: 21-46.
5. Buzbee WW (2005) The regulatory fragmentation continuum, westway and the challenges of regional growth. J Law Polit 21: 323-364.
6. Cameron G, Muellbauer J (1998) The housing market and regional commuting and migration choices. Scott J Polit Econ 45: 420-446.
7. Carlino GA, Mills ES (1987) The determinants of county growth. J Reg Sci 27: 39-54.
8. Carruthers JI, Mulligan GF (2007) Land absorption in U. S. metropolitan areas: estimates and projections from regional adjustment models. Geogr Anal 39: 78-104.
9. Carruthers JI, Ulfarsson GF (2002) Fragmentation and sprawl: evidence from interregional analysis. Growth Change 33: 312-340.
10. Dawkins CJ (2000) Transaction costs and the land use planning process. J Plan Lit 14: 507-518.
11. Downs A (1991) The advisory commission on regulatory barriers to affordable housing: its behavior and accomplishments. Hous Policy Debate 2: 1095-1137.
12. Fischel WA (1985) The economics of zoning laws: a property rights approach to American land use controls. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
13. Glaeser EL (2006) The economic impact of restricting housing supply. Policy Briefs PB-2006-3, Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Harvard University. http://www. hks. harvard. edu/rappaport/downloads/policybriefs/glaeserhousing_final. pdf. Accessed 07 Dec 2008.
14. Glaeser EL, Gyourko J, Saks RE (2006) Urban growth and housing supply. J Econ Geogr 6: 71-89.
15. Gyourko J, Saiz A, Summers A (2008) A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: the Wharton residential land use regulatory index. Urban Stud 45: 693-729.
16. Horner MW (2007) A multi-scale analysis of urban form and commuting change in a small metropolitan area (1990-2000). Ann Reg Sci 41: 315-332.
17. Ihlanfeldt KR (1994) The spatial mismatch between jobs and residential locations within urban areas. Cityscape J Policy Dev Res 1: 219-244.
18. Ihlanfeldt KR (2004) Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: a review of the evidence and policy prescriptions. Urban Stud 41: 261-283.
19. Ihlanfeldt KR, Sjoquist DL (1998) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: a review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Hous Policy Debate 9: 849-892.
20. Kaiser EJ, Godschalk DR (1995) Twentieth century land use planning: a stalwart family tree. J Am Plan Assoc 61: 365-385.
21. Kelejian HH, Robinson DP (1993) A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to a county expenditure model. Pap Reg Sci 72: 297-312.
22. Kim JH (2011) Linking land use planning and regulation to economic development: a literature review. J Plan Lit 26: 35-47.
23. Kim S (2011) Intraregional residential movement of the elderly: testing a suburban-to-urban migration hypothesis. Ann Reg Sci 46: 1-17.
24. Kim JH, Hewings GJD (2012) Integrating the fragmented regional and subregional socioeconomic forecasting and analysis: a spatial regional econometric input-output framework. Ann Reg Sci 49: 485-513.
25. Kim JH, Hewings GJD (2013) Interjurisdictional competition and land development: a micro-level analysis. In: Pagliara F, de Bok M, Simmonds D, Wilson A (eds) Employment location in cities and regions: models and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 181-199.
26. Levine J (1998) Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance. J Am Plan Assoc 64: 133-149.
27. Levine J (2006) Zoned out: regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land-use. RFF Press, Washington, DC.
28. Levinson DM (1997) Job and housing tenure and the journey to work. Ann Reg Sci 31: 451-471.
29. Linneman P, Summers A (1991) Wharton urban decentralization project data set. Wharton Real Estate Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.
30. Malpezzi S (1996) Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U. S. metropolitan areas. J Hous Res 7: 209-241.
31. Mayer CJ, Somerville CT (2000) Land use regulation and new construction. Reg Sci Urban Econ 30: 639-662.
32. Moore T (1978) Why allow planners to do what they do? A justification from economic theory. J Am Inst Plan 44: 387-398.
33. Mulligan GF, Vias AC (2006) Growth and change in U. S. micropolitan areas. Ann Reg Sci 40: 203-228.
34. Pendall R (1999) Do land-use controls cause sprawl? Environ Plan B Plan Des 26: 555-574.
35. Pendall R (2000) Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. J Am Plan Assoc 66: 125-142.
36. Pendall R, Puentes R, Martin J (2006) From traditional to reformed: a review of the land use regulations in the Nation's 50 largest metropolitan areas. Brookings Institution.
37. Platt RH (1996) Land use and society: geography, law, and public policy. Island Press, Washington, DC.
38. Pollakowski HO, Wachter SM (1990) The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices. Land Econ 66: 315-324.
39. Quigley JM, Raphael S (2004) Is housing unaffordable? Why isn't it more affordable? J Econ Perspect 18: 191-214.
40. Rey SJ, Boarnet MG (2004) A taxonomy of spatial econometric models for simultaneous equations systems. In: Anselin L, Florax R, Rey SJ (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools, and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 99-119.
41. Riley SF (2012) Land use regulations and the returns to low-income homeownership. Ann Reg Sci 49: 745-766.
42. Rudel TK (1989) Situations and strategies in American land use planning. Cambridge University Press, New York.
43. Saks RE (2008) Job creation and housing construction: constraints on metropolitan area employment growth. J Urban Econ 64: 178-195.
44. Shen Q (1996) Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: the San Francisco Bay region in the 1980s. Environ Plan B Plan Des 23: 61-91.
45. Teitz MB (1996) American planning in the 1990s: evolution, debate, and challenge. Urban Stud 33: 649-671.
46. Thorson JA (1996) An examination of the monopoly zoning hypothesis. Land Econ 72: 43-55.
47. Ulfarsson GF, Carruthers JI (2006) The cycle of fragmentation and sprawl: a conceptual framework and empirical model. Environ Plan B Plan Des 33: 767-788.
48. van der Vlist AJ, Gorter C, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2002) Residential mobility and local housing-market differences. Environ Plan A 34: 1147-1164.
49. van Ommeren J, Rietveld P, Nijkamp P (2000) Job mobility, residential mobility and commuting: a theoretical analysis using search theory. Ann Reg Sci 34: 213-232.