Interjurisdictional competition and land development: A micro-level analysis

Advances in Spatial Science

Volumn 74, Issue , 2013, Pages 181-199

  Kim, Jae Hong ^a   Hewings, Geoffrey J D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876908576     PISSN: 14309602     EISSN: 21979375     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31779-8_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Brown BB, Yamada I, Smith KR, Zick CD, Kowaleski-Jones L, Fan JX (2009) Mixed land use and walkability: variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health Place 15:1130-1141
2. Broyden CG (1970) The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms. IMA J Appl Math 6:76-90
3. Brueckner JK (2003) Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. Int Reg Sci Rev 26:175-188
4. Carruthers JI (2003) Growth at the Fringe: the influence of political fragmentation in United States metropolitan areas. Pap Reg Sci 82:475-499
5. Carruthers JI, Ulfarsson GF (2002) Fragmentation and sprawl: evidence from interregional analysis. Growth Change 33:312-340
6. Cervero R (1989) America’s suburban centers: the land use -transportation link. Unwin Hyman, Boston
7. Dewar M, Epstein D (2007) Planning for “Megaregions” in the United States. J Plann Lit 22:108-124
8. Downs A (1994) New visions for metropolitan America. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
9. Ewing RH (1996) Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a literature review. Environ Urban Stud 21:1-15
10. Fletcher R (1970) A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput J 13:317-322
11. Foster KA (2001) Regionalism on purpose. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
12. Frank LD, Pivo G (1994) Impacts of mixed land use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transport Res Rec 1466:44-52
13. Frank LD, Andresen MA, Schmid TL (2004) Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med 27:87-96
14. Fulton W et al (2001) Who sprawls the most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Bookings Institution, Washington, DC
15. Glaeser EL, Kahn M, Chu C (2001) Job sprawl: employment location in U.S. Metropolitan areas. Bookings Institution, Washington, DC
16. Goldfarb D (1970) A family of variable metric updates derived by variational means. Math Comput 24:23-26
17. Gordon P, Richardson HW (1997) Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? J Am Plann Assoc 63:95-106
18. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248
19. Howell-Moroney M (2008) The Tiebout hypothesis 50 years later: lessons and lingering challenges for metropolitan governance in the 21st century. Public Adm Rev 68:97-109
20. Innes JE, Booher DE, Di Vittorio S (2011) Strategies for megaregion governance. J Am Plann Assoc 77:55-67
21. Kim JH (2011) Linking land use planning and regulation to economic development: a literature review. J Plann Lit 26:35-47
22. Krizek KJ (2003) Operationalizing neighborhood accessibility for land use -travel behavior research and regional modeling. J Plann Educ Res 22:270-287
23. Kunce M, Shogren JF (2005) On interjurisdictional competition and environmental federalism. J Environ Econ Manag 50:212-224
24. Levine J (2006) Zoned out: regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land use. RFF Press, Washington, DC
25. Lewis P (1996) Shaping suburbia: how political institutions organize urban development. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
26. McKinney M, Essington K (2006) Learning to think and act like a region. Land Lines 18:8-13
27. Oates WE (1999) An essay on fiscal federalism. J Econ Lit 37:1120-1149
28. Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. J Appl Econom 11:619-632
29. Pendall R (1999) Do land-use controls cause sprawl? Environ Plann B Plann Des 26:555-571
30. Razin E, Rosentraub M (2000) Are fragmentation and sprawl interlinked? North American evidence. Urban Aff Rev 35:821-836
31. Rolleston BS (1987) Determinants of restrictive suburban zoning: an empirical analysis. J Urban Econ 21:1-21
32. Ross S, Yinger J (1999) Sorting and voting: a review of the literature on urban public finance. In: Cheshire P, Mills ES (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 3. North-Holland, New York, pp 2001-2060
33. Shanno DF (1970) Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization. Math Comput 24:647-656
34. Shen Q (1996) Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: the San Francisco Bay Region in the 1980s. Environ Plann B Plann Des 23:61-91
35. Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64:416-424
36. Tsai YH (2005) Quantifying urban form: compactness versus ‘sprawl’. Urban Stud 42:141-161
37. U.S. Geological Survey (2008) Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992-2001 land cover change retrofit product. Open-File Report 2008-1379. U.S. Department of the Interior
38. Ulfarsson GF, Carruthers JI (2006) The cycle of fragmentation and sprawl: a conceptual framework and empirical model. Environ Plann B Plann Des 33:767-788
39. White MJ (1975) Fiscal zoning in fragmented metropolitan areas. In: Mills ES, Oates WE (eds) Fiscal zoning and land use controls: the economic issues. Lexington Books, Lexington, pp 31-100
40. Wildasin DE (2006) Fiscal competition. In: Weingast BR, Wittman DA (eds) Oxford handbook of political economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 502-520
41. Wilson AG (1970) Entropy in urban and regional modelling. Pion, London
42. Wilson JD, Wildasin DE (2004) Capital tax competition: bane or boon. J Public Econ 88:1065-1091
43. Windsor D (1979) Fiscal zoning in suburban communities. Lexington Books, Lexington
44. Yaffee SL (1997) Why environmental policy nightmares recur. Conserv Biol 11:328-337
45. Yaro RD (2011) America 2050: towards a twenty-first-century national infrastructure investment plan for the United States. In: Xu J, Yeh AGO (eds) Governance and planning of mega-city regions: an international comparative perspective. Routledge, New York, pp 127-147
46. Zellner ML et al (2009) The emergence of zoning games in exurban jurisdictions: informing collective action theory. Land Use Policy 26:356-367
47. Zhang J (2011) Interjurisdictional competition for FDI: the case of China’s “development zone fever”. Reg Sci Urban Econ 41:145-159