Improvement in coronary haemodynamics after percutaneous coronary intervention: Assessment using instantaneous wave-free ratio

Heart

Volumn 99, Issue 23, 2013, Pages 1740-1748

  Nijjer, Sukhjinder S ^a   Sen, Sayan ^a   Petraco, Ricardo ^a   Sachdeva, Rajesh ^b,c   Cuculi, Florim ^d   Escaned, Javier ^e   Broyd, Christopher ^a   Foin, Nicolas ^a   Hadjiloizou, Nearchos ^a   Foale, Rodney A ^a   Malik, Iqbal ^a   Mikhail, Ghada W ^a   Sethi, Amarjit S ^a   Al Bustami, Mahmud ^a   Kaprielian, Raffi R ^a   Khan, Masood A ^a   Baker, Christopher S ^a   Bellamy, Michael F ^a   Hughes, Alun D ^a   Mayet, Jamil ^a   Kharbanda, Rajesh K ^d   Di Mario, Carlo ^f   Davies, Justin E ^a   more..

^a NATIONAL HEART AND LUNG INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b North Fulton Regional Hospital   (United States)

^c CENTRAL ARKANSAS VETERANS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^f ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART INDEX; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; INSTANTANEOUS WAVE FREE RATIO; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PD/PA RATIO; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SMOKING; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; VASODILATATION;

CORONARY PHYSIOLOGY;

CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84888040843     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304387     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1392-402.
2. Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, et al. Classi fication performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional fl ow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. EuroIntervention 2012; epublished ahead of print. http://www.pcronline.com/ eurointervention/ahead-of-print/201208-02/. PMID: 22917666
3. Park JJ, Petraco R, Nam C-W, et al . Clinical validation of the resting pressure parameters in the assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis; results of an independent, blinded comparison with fractional flow reserve. International Journal of Cardiology Epub 29th July 2013; doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.030.
4. Sen S, Asrress KN, Nijjer S, et al. Diagnostic classi fication of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1409-20.
5. Pijls NH, Kern MJ, Yock PG, et al. Practice and potential pitfalls of coronary pressure measurement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:1-16.
6. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24.
7. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991-1001.
8. Berry C, van 't Veer M, Witt N, et al. VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1421-7.
9. Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Asrress KN, et al. Does the instantaneous wave-free ratio approximate the fractional flow reserve? J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1428-35.
10. Grüntzig A, Senning A, Siegenthaler W. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1979;301:61-8.
11. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 1974;33:87-94.
12. Gould KL. Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circ Res 1978;43:242-53.
13. Muller O, Pyxaras SA, Trana C, et al. Pressure-diameter relationship in human coronary arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:791-6.
14. Verhoeff B-J, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, et al. Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention on coronary microvascular resistance index. Circulation 2005;111:76-82.
15. Mangiacapra F, Peace AJ, Di Serafino L, et al. Intracoronary enalaprilat to reduce microvascular damage during percutaneous coronary intervention (ProMicro) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:615-21.
16. Pijls NHJ, Gelder BV, der Voort PV, et al. Fractional flow reserve a useful index to evaluate the in fluence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995;92:3183-93.
17. Chamuleau SAJ, Siebes M, Meuwissen M, et al. Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;285:H2194-200.
18. Cuisset T, Hamilos M, Melikian N, et al. Direct stenting for stable Angina Pectoris is associated with reduced periprocedural microcirculatory injury compared with stenting after pre-dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1060-5.
19. Fujii K, Kawasaki D, Oka K, et al. The impact of pravastatin pre-treatment on periprocedural microcirculatory damage in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011;4:513-20.
20. Bech GJ, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty. Circulation 1999;99:883-8.
21. Bech GJ-W, De Bruyne B, Akasaka T, et al . Coronary pressure and FFR predict long-term outcome after PTCA. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;4:67-76.
22. Van't Veer M, Pijls NHJ, Aarnoudse W, et al. Evaluation of the haemodynamic characteristics of drug-eluting stents at implantation and at follow-up. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1811-17.
23. Ntalianis A, Sels J-W, Davidavicius G, et al. Fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit coronary artery stenoses in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2010;3:1274-81.
24. Sels J-WEM, Tonino PAL, Siebert U, et al. Fractional flow reserve in unstable Angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011;4:1183-9.
25. Pijls NHJ, Klauss V, Siebert U, et al. Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up: a multicenter registry. Circulation 2002;105:2950-4.
26. Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Thuesen L, et al. Influence of a pressure gradient distal to implanted bare-metal stent on in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2007;116:2802-8.
27. Rieber J, Schiele TM, Erdin P, et al. Fractional flow reserve predicts major adverse cardiac events after coronary stent implantation. Z Kardiol 2002;91(Suppl 3):132-6.
28. Tamita K, Akasaka T, Takagi T, et al. Effects of microvascular dysfunction on myocardial fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:452-9.
29. Hanekamp CEE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NHJ, et al. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999;99:1015-21.
30. Fearon WF, Luna J, Samady H, et al. Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular wltrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment. Circulation 2001;104:1917-22.
31. Mamas M, Horner S, Welch E, et al. Resting Pd/Pa measured with intracoronary pressure wire strongly predicts fractional fl ow reserve. J Invasive Cardiol 2010;22:260-5.
32. Pijls NHJ. Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization. Circulation Journal 2013;77:561-9.
33. Van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, Damman P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity information during baseline conditions: adenosine-free assessment of functional coronary lesion severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:508-14.
34. Petraco R, Park JJ, Sen S, et al . Hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy: implications for enhancing universal adoption of physiology-guided coronary revascularisation. EuroIntervention 2013;8:1157-65.
35. Bookstein JJ, Higgins CB. Comparative efficacy of coronary vasodilatory methods. Invest Radiol 1977;12:121-7.
36. Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV, et al. Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 1990;82:1595-606.
37. Jeremias A, Filardo SD, Whitbourn RJ, et al. Effects of intravenous and intracoronary Adenosine 5′-Triphosphate as compared with Adenosine on coronary flow and pressure dynamics. Circulation 2000;101:318-23.
38. Saihara K, Hamasaki S, Biro S, et al. Reactive hyperemia following coronary balloon angioplasty, but not dipyridamole-induced hyperemia, predicts resolution of exercise-induced ST-segment depression. Coron Artery Dis 2003;14:501-7.
39. Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol 1974;34:48-55.
40. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Calvert C. Compensatory changes of the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive coronary constriction. Circulation 1975;51:1085-94.
41. Kanatsuka H, Lamping KG, Eastham CL, et al. Heterogeneous changes in epimyocardial microvascular size during graded coronary stenosis. Evidence of the microvascular site for autoregulation. Circ Res 1990;66:389-96.
42. Sambuceti G, Marzilli M, Fedele S, et al. Paradoxical increase in microvascular resistance during tachycardia downstream from a severe stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease reversal by angioplasty. Circulation 2001;103:2352-60.
43. Puymirat É, Muller O, Sharif F, et al. Fractional flow reserve: Concepts, applications and use in France in 2010. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2010;103:615-22.
44. Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde M-F, et al. One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2623-9.
45. Pijls NHJ, Sels J-WEM. Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1045-57.
46. Pijls NHJ, Tonino PAL. The crux of maximum hyperemia: the last remaining barrier for routine use of fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:1093-5.
47. Ntalianis A, Trana C, Muller O, et al. Effective radiation dose, time, and contrast medium to measure fractional flow reserve. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2010;3:821-7.
48. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/ HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of thoracic surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:857-81.
49. Jeremias A, Whitbourn RJ, Filardo SD, et al. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J 2000;140:651-7.