Effective radiation dose, time, and contrast medium to measure fractional flow reserve

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 821-827

  Ntalianis, Argyrios ^a   Trana, Catalina ^a   Muller, Olivier ^a   Mangiacapra, Fabio ^a   Peace, Aaron ^a   De Backer, Carina ^a   De Block, Liesbeth ^a   Wyffels, Eric ^a   Bartunek, Jozef ^a   Vanderheyden, Marc ^a   Heyse, Alex ^a   Van Durme, Frederic ^a   Van Driessche, Luc ^a   De Jans, Jo ^a   Heyndrickx, Guy R ^a   Wijns, William ^a   Barbato, Emanuele ^a   De Bruyne, Bernard ^a  

^a CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Belgium)

Author keywords

contrast medium; coronary angiography; fractional flow reserve; radiation

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; HYPEREMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE;

EID: 78650169001     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2105-11.
2. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al., on behalf of COURAGE Trial Investigators. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008;117: 1283-91.
3. Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Cosgrove DM, et al. Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims data base. Circulation 1993;87:1489-97.
4. Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, Malenka DJ, Vittinghoff E, Redberg RF. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2008;300:1765-73.
5. Wijns W, De Bruyne B, Vanhoenacker PK. What does the clinical cardiologist need from noninvasive cardiac imaging: Is it time to adjust practices to meet evolving demands? J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:366-70.
6. Wijns W, Kolh P. Appropriate myocardial revascularization: a joint viewpoint from an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2182-5.
7. De Bruyne B, Sarma J. Fractional flow reserve: a review. Heart 2008;94:949-59.
8. Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009;119:1056-65.
9. Servomaa A, Tapiovaara M. Organ dose calculation in medical X ray examinations by the program PCXMC. Rad Prot Dos 1998;80:213-9.
10. Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF. Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements. Report of the National Radiological Protection Board-R262. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1994.
11. Bogaert E, Bacher K, Thierens H. A large-scale multicentre study in Belgium of dose area product values and effective doses in interven-tional cardiology using contemporary X-ray equipment. Rad Prot Dos 2008;128:312-23.
12. Bogaert E, Bacher K, Thierens H. Interventional cardiovascular procedures in Belgium: effective dose and conversion factors. Rad Prot Dos 2008;129:77-82.
13. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009;361: 849-57.
14. Einstein A, Henzlova M, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298:317-23.
15. Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.
16. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Risk Estimates for Radiation Protection. Report No. 115. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1993.
17. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007;116:1290-305.
18. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301:500-7.
19. Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008; 248:254-63.
20. Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF, et al. One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2623-9.
21. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1393-9.
22. Christou MA, Siontis GC, Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:450-6.
23. Tonino P, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al., on behalf of FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24.