Nanog, Pou5f1 and SoxB1 activate zygotic gene expression during the maternal-to-zygotic transition

Nature

Volumn 503, Issue 7476, 2013, Pages 360-364

  Lee, Miler T ^a   Bonneau, Ashley R ^a   Takacs, Carter M ^a   Bazzini, Ariel A ^a   Divito, Kate R ^a   Fleming, Elizabeth S ^a   Giraldez, Antonio J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICRORNA; MICRORNA 430; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CYPRINID; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; MATERNAL EFFECT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GASTRULATION; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HOUSEKEEPING GENE; MATERNAL TO ZYGOTIC TRANSITION; NONHUMAN; POLYADENYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPLETION; RIBOSOME; RNA SEQUENCE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; UPREGULATION; ZYGOTE;

ANIMALS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; MICRORNAS; MOTHERS; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; RIBOSOMES; SOXB1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTOME; ZEBRAFISH; ZEBRAFISH PROTEINS; ZYGOTE;

DANIO RERIO; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84888038427     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12632     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ten Bosch, J. R., Benavides, J. A. & Cline, T. W. The TAGteamDNAmotif controls the timing of Drosophila pre-blastodermtranscription. Development 133, 1967-1977 (2006).
2. Liang, H. L. et al. The zinc-finger protein Zelda is a key activator of the early zygotic genome in Drosophila. Nature 456, 400-403 (2008).
3. Tadros, W. & Lipshitz, H. D. The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts. Development 136, 3033-3042 (2009).
4. Andersen, I. S. et al. Epigenetic marking of the zebrafish developmental program. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 104, 85-112 (2013).
5. Vastenhouw, N. L. et al. Chromatin signature of embryonic pluripotency is established during genome activation. Nature 464, 922-926 (2010).
6. Lindeman, L. C. et al. Prepatterning of developmental gene expression bymodified histones before zygotic genome activation. Dev. Cell 21, 993-1004 (2011).
7. Potok, M. E., Nix, D. A., Parnell, T. J. & Cairns, B. R. Reprogramming the maternal zebrafish genome after fertilization tomatch the paternalmethylation pattern. Cell 153, 759-772 (2013).
8. Jiang, L. et al. Sperm, but not oocyte, DNA methylome is inherited by zebrafish early embryos. Cell 153, 773-784 (2013).
9. Kane, D. A. & Kimmel, C. B. The zebrafishmidblastula transition. Development 119, 447-456 (1993).
10. Giraldez, A. J. et al. Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science 312, 75-79 (2006).
11. Lund, E., Liu, M., Hartley, R. S., Sheets, M. D. & Dahlberg, J. E. Deadenylation of maternal mRNAs mediated by miR-427 in Xenopus laevis embryos. RNA 15, 2351-2363 (2009).
12. Giraldez, A. J. microRNAs, the cell's Nepenthe: clearing the past during the maternal-to-zygotic transition and cellular reprogramming. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 369-375 (2010).
13. Harvey, S. A. et al. Identification of the zebrafish maternal and paternal transcriptomes. Development 140, 2703-2710 (2013).
14. Aanes, H. et al. Zebrafish mRNA sequencing deciphers novelties in transcriptome dynamics during maternal to zygotic transition. Genome Res. 21, 1328-1338 (2011).
15. Kaida, D. et al. U1 snRNP protects pre-mRNAs from premature cleavage and polyadenylation. Nature 468, 664-668 (2010).
16. Bazzini, A. A., Lee, M. T. & Giraldez, A. J. Ribosome profiling shows that miR-430 reduces translation before causing mRNA decay in zebrafish. Science 336, 233-237 (2012).
17. Chambers, I. & Tomlinson, S. R. The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency. Development 136, 2311-2322 (2009).
18. Onichtchouk, D. Pou5f1/oct4 in pluripotency control: insights from zebrafish. Genesis 50, 75-85 (2012).
19. Onichtchouk, D. et al. Zebrafish Pou5f1-dependent transcriptional networks in temporal control of early development. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 354 (2010).
20. Okuda, Y., Ogura, E., Kondoh, H. & Kamachi, Y. B1SOX coordinate cell specification with patterning and morphogenesis in the early zebrafish embryo. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000936 (2010).
21. Lunde, K., Belting, H. G. & Driever, W. Zebrafish pou5f1/pou2, homolog of mammalian Oct4, functions in the endodermspecification cascade. Curr. Biol. 14, 48-55 (2004).
22. Hauptmann, G. et al. spiel ohne grenzen/pou2 is required for zebrafish hindbrain segmentation. Development 129, 1645-1655 (2002).
23. Belting, H. G. et al. Pou5f1 contributes to dorsoventral patterning by positive regulation of vox and modulation of fgf8a expression. Dev. Biol. 356, 323-336 (2011).
24. Xu, C. et al. Nanog-like regulates endoderm formation through the Mxtx2-Nodal pathway. Dev. Cell 22, 625-638 (2012).
25. Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. & Weissman, J. S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218-223 (2009).
26. Giraldez, A. J. et al. MicroRNAs regulate brainmorphogenesis in zebrafish. Science 308, 833-838 (2005).
27. Loh, Y. H. et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 38, 431-440 (2006).
28. Leichsenring, M., Maes, J., Mossner, R., Driever, W. & Onichtchouk, D. Pou5f1 transcription factor controls zygotic gene activation in vertebrates. Science 341, 1005-1009 (2013).
29. Foygel, K. et al. A novel and critical role for Oct4 as a regulator of the maternal-embryonic transition. PLoS ONE 3, e4109 (2008).
30. Tan, M. H. et al. An Oct4-Sall4-Nanog network controls developmental progression in the pre-implantation mouse embryo. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 632 (2013).
31. Keramari, M. et al. Sox2 is essential for formation of trophectoderm in the preimplantation embryo. PLoS ONE 5, e13952 (2010).
32. Frum, T. et al.Oct4 cell-autonomously promotes primitive endodermdevelopment in the mouse blastocyst. Dev. Cell 25, 610-622 (2013).
33. Messerschmidt, D. M. & Kemler, R. Nanog is required for primitive endoderm formation through a non-cell autonomous mechanism. Dev. Biol. 344, 129-137 (2010).
34. Gurdon, J. B., Elsdale, T. R. & Fischberg, M. Sexually mature individuals of Xenopus laevis fromthe transplantation of single somatic nuclei. Nature 182, 64-65 (1958).
35. Gurdon, J. B. & Melton, D. A. Nuclear reprogramming in cells. Science 322, 1811-1815 (2008).
36. Mitsui, K. et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113, 631-642 (2003).
37. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
38. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861-872 (2007).
39. Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318-324 (2007).
40. Yu, J. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917-1920 (2007).
41. Chambers, I. et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 1230-1234 (2007).
42. Masui, S. et al. Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 625-635 (2007).
43. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J. & Smith, A. G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genet. 24, 372-376 (2000).
44. Soufi, A., Donahue, G. & Zaret, K. S. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors' initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151, 994-1004 (2012).
45. Judson, R. L., Babiarz, J. E., Venere, M. & Blelloch, R. Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs promote induced pluripotency. Nature Biotechnol. 27, 459-461 (2009).
46. Subramanyam, D. et al. Multiple targets of miR-302 and miR-372 promote reprogramming of human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 29, 443-448 (2011).
47. Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
48. Amsterdam, A. et al. Identification of 315 genes essential for early zebrafish development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12792-12797 (2004).
49. Matter, N. & Konig, H. Targeted 'knockdown' of spliceosome function in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e41 (2005).
50. Rösel, T. D. et al. RNA-Seq analysis inmutant zebrafish reveals role of U1C protein in alternative splicing regulation. EMBO J. 30, 1965-1976 (2011).
51. Iwafuchi-Doi, M. et al. The Pou5f1/Pou3f-dependent but SoxB-independent regulation of conserved enhancer N2 initiates Sox2 expression during epiblast to neural plate stages in vertebrates. Dev. Biol. 352, 354-366 (2011).
52. Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. & Schilling, T. F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203, 253-310 (1995).
53. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast andmemory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
54. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105-1111 (2009).
55. Collins, J. E., White, S., Searle, S. M. & Stemple, D. L. Incorporating RNA-seq data into the zebrafish Ensembl genebuild. Genome Res. 22, 2067-2078 (2012).
56. Berg, M. G. et al. U1 snRNP determines mRNA length and regulates isoform expression. Cell 150, 53-64 (2012).
57. Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106-1117 (2008).
58. Marson, A. et al.Connecting microRNAgenes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521-533 (2008).
59. Hamatani, T., Carter, M. G., Sharov, A. A. & Ko, M. S. Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse preimplantation development. Dev. Cell 6, 117-131 (2004).